92443 OCCC Assessment 2 Rubric – Case study – Person centred care
| Weighting 100% | Criterion | High Distinction (100%-85%) | Distinction (84%-75%) | Credit (74%-65%) | Pass (64%-50%) | Fail (49%-0%) |
| 15% | 1.Introduction Provide a summary of relevant scholarly evidence explaining key factors for optimal care delivery for people living with the chosen chronic illness. The chronic illness and the case study are identified. The chronic illness is different to the one selected in assessment 1. The introduction is written in ‘third person’ academic style. | The chronic illness and the case study are clearly identified. The chronic illness is different to the one selected in assessment 1. Draws on a scholarly selection of literature to define, explain and critically evaluate key factors for optimal care delivery for people living with the chosen chronic illness in the context of the case study. The student writes skillfully using scholarly literature to fully support discussion points. 15 – 13 marks | The chronic illness and the case study are clearly identified. The chronic illness is different to the one selected in assessment 1. Draws on a scholarly selection of literature to define, discuss and evaluate key factors for optimal care delivery for people living with the chosen chronic illness in the context of the case study. The student writes appropriately and uses some scholarly literature to support the discussion points. 12.5 – 11.5 marks | The chronic illness and the case study are identified. The chronic illness is different to the one selected in assessment 1. Draws on a selection of literature to define and discuss key factors for optimal care delivery for people living with the chosen chronic illness. The student writes appropriately however some points may not be supported by the literature. 11 – 10 marks | The chronic illness and the case study are vaguely identified. The chronic illness is different to the one selected in assessment 1 but not on the list. Some appropriate scholarly literature accessed to list key factors for optimal care delivery for people living with the chosen chronic illness. Most of the summary points are not supported by the literature. 9.5 – 7.5 marks | The chronic illness and/or the case study are not identified. The chronic illness is the same as the one selected in assessment 1 or not on the list. Analysis does not adequately support optimal care delivery for the chosen chronic condition. The summary points are unsupported by the literature. 7.0 – 0 marks |
| 20% | 2. Powerlessness – Critically discuss the ways in which nurses can facilitate empowerment and self-management for clients and their families/carers in order to achieve a good quality of life for your chosen chronic illness and case scenario. Accurate and relevant definitions of powerlessness, empowerment and patient self-management are included. | Clear, accurate and relevant definitions of powerlessness, empowerment and patient self-management are included. Critical discussion, explanation, and analysis of the role of the nurse in enabling self-management for clients and their families/carers. This incorporates key factors for optimal care for your chosen chronic illness and case study. Thorough consideration of person-centred, holistic care in which all aspects of the patient’s wellbeing are considered. Evident that the student is well informed and has thoroughly researched these topics. The student writes fluently and uses the academic literature to support discussion points. | Accurate and relevant definitions of powerlessness, empowerment and patient self-management are included. Explanation and discussion of the role of the nurse in enabling self-management for clients and their families/carers for optimal care. This discussion includes reference to your chosen chronic illness and case study. Sound consideration of person-centred, holistic care in which all aspects of the patient’s wellbeing is evident. Evident that the student is informed and researched these topics. The student writes appropriately uses the academic literature to support the discussion. | Relevant definitions of powerlessness, empowerment and patient self-management are included. Explanation of the role of the nurse in enabling self-management for clients and their families/carers and optimal care of your chosen chronic illness and case study. Consideration of person-centred, holistic care in which all aspects of the patient’s wellbeing is evident. The discussion lacks identified research or evidence or nonacademic sources. Some points may not be supported with evidence. | Definitions of powerlessness, empowerment and patient self-management are included. The roles of the nurse in enabling self-management for clients is mentioned and their families/carers and optimal care you are your chosen chronic illness and case study. Limited consideration of person-centred, holistic care in which all aspects of the patient’s wellbeing is evident. Most of the discussion is not supported by the literature. | Definitions of powerlessness, empowerment and patient self-management are not included or not relevant to this context. Explanation of the roles of the nurse in enabling self-management and optimal care for people with chronic and complex conditions are not mentioned or irrelevant. Consideration of person-centred, holistic care in which all aspects of the patient’s wellbeing is not evident Information and details are inaccurate and no/minimal research is identified. The discussion is unsupported by the literature and is based on personal opinion. |
| 15% | 3. Local resources – Building on the introduction, consider the recommendations for the patient (and their family’s) care within one particular local area or health district. This enhanced by investigation into local resources available, specific to a designated local area or health district. | Thorough outline of a recommended model of care for people living the chosen chronic illness with complex healthcare needs across varied acute and primary healthcare settings. Clear and concise outline of how to implement the identified plan of care using resources available in the local area or district. Academic literature and evidence integrated where appropriate into the discussion. | Sound outline of a recommended model of care for people living the chosen chronic illness with complex healthcare needs across varied acute and primary healthcare settings. Concise outline of how to implement the identified plan of care using resources available in the local area or district. Evidence and literature integrated where appropriate into the discussion. | Description of a model of care for people living the chosen chronic illness with complex healthcare needs across varied acute and/or primary healthcare settings. Relevant outline of how to implement the identified plan of care using resources available in the local area or district. Evidence integrated where appropriate into the discussion. | Limited outline of model of care for people living the chosen chronic illness with complex healthcare needs across varied acute and/or primary healthcare settings. Vague outline of how to implement the identified plan of care in the local area or district. Minimal evidence integrated where appropriate into the discussion. | Little or no outline of model of care for people living the chosen chronic illness with complex healthcare needs across varied acute and/or primary healthcare settings. Unsatisfactory. The plan of care is not well implemented using resources in the local area or district. No evidence integrated where appropriate into the discussion. |
| 15% | 4. Challenges – Link care recommendations in the introduction to the available resources and discuss potential challenges or barriers. Implementation of the plan of care is outlined and clearly related to available local resources, specific to the chosen case study designated local area or health district. In this section, the student links their care recommendations to the available resources and discuss potential challenges or barriers. | Optimal care recommendations in the introduction is clearly linked to available resources. Relevant challenges and barriers in implementing the plan to available resources are discussed. This is specific to the chosen case study and designated local area or health district. Thoughtful management strategies for these are explained. Meaningful insights into potential barriers. The student writes skillfully using the literature and examples to fully support discussion points. | Optimal care recommendations in the introduction is well linked to available resources. Challenges and barriers in implementing the care plan to available resources. This is specific to the chosen case study and designated local area or health district. Insights into potential barriers mentioned. The student writes appropriately and uses the literature and examples to support most of the discussion points. | Optimal care recommendations in the introduction is linked to available resources. Challenges and barriers in implementing this care plan to available resources. This is specific to the chosen case study and designated local area or health district. Some insights into the barriers. Some points may not be supported by the literature. Link to the care plan could be clearer. | Optimal care recommendations in the introduction is vaguely linked to available resources. Limited discussion of challenges in implementing the plan to available resources. Not specific to the chosen case study and/or designated local area or health district. Minimal insights into barriers demonstrated. Most of the discussion is not supported by the literature and no examples are given. | Optimal care recommendations in the introduction is not linked to available resources. Challenges and/or barriers to implementation to available resources are not discussed. Not specific to the chosen case study and designated local area or health district. The discussion is unsupported by the literature and based on personal opinion. The student has failed to clearly identify relevant discussion points related to barriers. No evidence of research and no examples. |
| 20% | 5.Conclusion (300-400 words) Provide three specific nursing actions you will take into your future practice to optimise care in chronic conditions. Clear discussion and explanation of how learning will influence their future nursing practice. The conclusion is written in ‘first person’. | The student presents a comprehensive conclusion drawing on three specific nursing actions for their future nursing practice to optimise care in chronic. Demonstrates a strong understanding and a shift in knowledge with a clear development of new understanding. The conclusion demonstrates strong characteristics and skills required for professional engagement and effective lifelong learning. The student writes skillfully in the first person using the literature to fully support discussion points. 20- 17 marks | The student clearly articulates three specific nursing actions for their future nursing practice to optimise care in chronic conditions. Demonstrate a shift in knowledge and new understanding. The conclusion demonstrates characteristics and skills required for professional engagement and effective lifelong learning. The student writes appropriately in the first person and uses the literature to support the discussion points. 16.5 – 15 marks | The student identifies three specific nursing actions for their future nursing practice to optimise care in chronic conditions. Demonstrates a vague shift in knowledge and new understanding. The conclusion includes characteristics and skills required for professional engagement, but it could be more detailed. The student writes in the first person and most points are supported by the literature. 14.5 13 marks | Partial identification of three specific nursing actions for their future nursing practice to optimise care in chronic conditions. These are poorly related to at least two specific nursing actions. Partially demonstrates a shift in knowledge with little discussion on any new understanding related to optimal care in chronic conditions. Nursing characteristics and skills required for professional engagement and effective lifelong learning is poorly identified, and the relevance of the student’s own nursing and/or personal experience is superficially addressed. Much of the discussion is not supported by the literature. 12.5- 10 marks | Overt lack of familiarity with how learning will influence future nursing practice to optimise care in chronic conditions and a general lack of familiarity with specific nursing actions. No shift in knowledge demonstrated and no discussion of any new understanding related to the chronic illness and nursing practice. Does not demonstrates characteristics and skills required for professional engagement and effective lifelong learning. The discussion is unsupported by the literature and is based on personal opinion. 9.5 – 0 marks |
| 15% | 6.Overall quality of writing and referencing Writing is clear and coherent (including appropriate sentence structure, spelling and grammar). Discussion is well supported with evidence (at least ten high quality and appropriate research papers). Correct paraphrasing and APA/Harvard referencing are evident. No more than 10% direct quotes. | There are no grammatical or vocabulary errors. Expression is clear and coherent. Use of evidence is convincing and correct. Ten high quality and appropriate research papers have been included. Correct paraphrasing and APA/Harvard referencing are evident. No more than 10% direct quotes. Complies with word count. 15 – 13 marks | There are no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors and these do not affect clarity. Use of evidence is convincing and correct. Less than ten high quality and appropriate research papers have been included or papers included are not all high quality and appropriate. Correct paraphrasing and APA/Harvard referencing are evident. Some minor errors. No more than 10% direct quotes. Complies with word count. 12.5 – 11.5 marks | There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors, that rarely affect clarity. Evidence is limited in scope and/or there are some errors in referencing conventions. More than seven high quality and appropriate research papers or scholarly sources have been included or papers included are not all high quality and appropriate. Use of paraphrasing and APA/Harvard referencing are mostly correct, less than five errors.No more than 10% direct quotes 11 – 10 marks | There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors, that may at times affect clarity. More than five appropriate qualitative research papers have been included or papers included are not all high quality and appropriate or relevance not obvious. Evidence is limited in scope and/or there are some errors in referencing conventions. Numerous errors in paraphrasing and APA/Harvard referencing are evident and more work is needed in referencing. 9.5 – 7.5 marks | There are numerous serious errors in grammar and vocabulary, that affect clarity. No or poor-quality papers have been included or not included as evidence. APA/Harvard referencing is not evident or poor. More than 10% direct quotes. Does not comply with word count.7.0 – 0 marks |
The post 92443 OCCC Assessment 2 Rubric appeared first on My Assignment Online.
