School of Health Sciences
400871 Professional Health Competencies
Autumn 2020
Edition: Autumn 2020
Copyright ©2020 University Western Sydney trading as Western Sydney University ABN 53 014 069 881 CRICOS Provider No: 00917K No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission from the Dean of the School. Copyright for acknowledged materials reproduced
herein is retained by the copyright holder. All readings in this publication are copied under licence in accordance with Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968.
Unit Details
| Unit Code: | 400871 |
| Unit Name: | Professional Health Competencies |
| Credit Points: | 10 |
| Unit Level: | 1 |
| Assumed Knowledge: | Not Applicable |
Note: Students with any problems, concerns or doubts should discuss those with the Unit Coordinator as early as they can.
Unit Coordinator
Name: Ms Liz Atteya
Email: e.atteya@westernsydney.edu.au
Consultation Arrangement:
Please email Liz for a consultation appointment.
Your tutor is your frst point of contact for questions with respect to the learning material.
Name: Dr Cathy Tannous
Email: c.tannous@westernsydney.edu.au
Consultation Arrangement:
Your tutor is your frst point of contact for questions with respect to the learning material.
Teaching Team
Name: Ms Sarah Cavallin
Email: s.cavallin@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Sarah Chuah
Email: s.chuah@westernsydney,edu.au
Name: Dr Inez Farag
Email: i.farag@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Marcus Drivas
Email: m.drivas@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Louise Breheny
Email: l.breheny@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Amanda Low
Email: a.low@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Johanna Korkalainen
Email: j.korkalainen@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Buck Reed
Email: b.reed@westernsydney.edu,au
Name: Ms Joanne Rodrigues
Email: j.rodrigues@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Ehab Ghobreyal
Email: g.ghobreyal@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Nariman Dennaoui
Email: n.dennaoui@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Tomas Megalaa
Email: t.megalaa@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Elise Desira
Email: e.desira@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Narelle Rowe
Email: n.rowe@westernsydney.edu.au
Note: The relevant Learning Guide Companion supplements this document
Contents
1 About Professional Health Competencies 2
1.1 An Introduction to this Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 What is Expected of You . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Changes to Unit as a Result of Past Student Feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 Assessment Information 4
2.1 Unit Learning Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Approach to Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3 Contribution to Course Learning Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4 Assessment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.5 Assessment Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.5.1 Four Online Competency Quizzes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.5.2 Annotated Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5.3 Case Study Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.5.4 Unit Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.5.5 Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.6 General Submission Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3 Teaching and Learning Activities 27
4 Learning Resources 31
4.1 Recommended Readings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1
1 About Professional Health Competencies
1.1 An Introduction to this Unit
This unit introduces skills for studying and working in health science. Students will gain an understanding of the
interdisciplinary and multi-disciplinary nature of health science practice in the 21st century, and how this interacts
with the specialty health professions, client and community expectations of health care and employment opportunities
in health science. Students will learn foundation competencies that will underpin their academic development and
their safe, responsible and ethical practice in health science service environments.
1.2 What is Expected of You
Study Load
A student is expected to study an hour per credit point a week. For example a 10 credit point unit would require 10
hours of study per week. This time includes the time spent within classes during lectures, tutorials or practicals.
Attendance
There is some overlap in the learning outcomes achieved by each assessment item. As such the following assessment
items are not mandatory ( ie Annotated Bibliography, case study assignment or unit reviews). The exception to this
is the 4 online competency-based quizzes which are threshold mandatory assessment tasks.
Online Learning Requirements
Unit materials will be made available on the unit’s vUWS (E-Learning) site (https://vuws.westernsydney.edu.au/).
You are expected to consult vUWS at least twice a week, as all unit announcements will be made via vUWS. Teaching
and learning materials will be regularly updated and posted online by the teaching team.
Special Requirements
Essential Equipment:
Not Applicable
Legislative Pre-Requisites:
Not Applicable
Policies Related to Teaching and Learning
The University has a number of policies that relate to teaching and learning. Important policies affecting students
include:
– Assessment Policy
– Bullying Prevention Policy and
– Guidelines
– Enrolment Policy
– Examinations Policy
– Review of Grade Policy
– Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy
– Special Consideration Policy
– Student Misconduct Rule
– Teaching and Learning – Fundamental Code
– Student Code of Conduct
2
Academic Integrity and Student Misconduct Rule
In submitting assessments, it is essential that you are familiar with the policies listed above and that you understand
the principles of academic integrity. You are expected to act honestly and ethically in the production of all academic
work and assessment tasks, submit work that is your own and acknowledge any contribution to your work made by
others.
Important information about academic integrity, including advice to students is available at https://www.westernsydney.
edu.au/studysmart/home/academic_integrity_and_plagiarism. It is your responsibility to familiarise yourself with
these principles and apply them to all work submitted to the University as your own.
When you submit an assignment or product, you will declare that no part has been: copied from any other student’s work or from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment; submitted by
you in another (previous or current) assessment, except where appropriately referenced, and with prior permission
from the Unit Coordinator; written/produced for you by any other person except where collaboration has been authorised by the Unit Coordinator.
The Student Misconduct Rule applies to all students of Western Sydney University and makes it an offence for
any student to engage in academic, research or general misconduct as defned in the Rule.
The University considers plagiarism, cheating and collusion as instances of academic misconduct. The University
also considers submitting falsifed documentation in support of applications for special consideration, including sitting
of deferred examinations, as instances of general misconduct. You should be aware that changes were made to the
Student Misconduct Rule commencing 1 January 2020 that provide for minimum sanctions that apply to certain
conduct, including the provision of falsifed documentation to the University.
You are strongly advised to read the Student Misconduct Rule and the Inappropriate Behaviour Guidelines at the
commencement of each session to familiarise yourself with this process and the expectations of the University in
relation to work submitted for assessment.
1.3 Changes to Unit as a Result of Past Student Feedback
The University values student feedback in order to improve the quality of its educational programs. The feedback
provided helps us improve teaching methods and units of study. The survey results inform unit content and design,
learning guides, teaching methods, assessment processes and teaching materials.
You are welcome to provide feedback that is related to the teaching of this unit. At the end of the semester you will
be given the opportunity to complete a Student Feedback on Unit (SFU) questionnaire to assess the unit. You may
also have the opportunity to complete a Student Feedback on Teaching (SFT) questionnaire to provide feedback for
individual teaching staff.
As a result of student feedback, the following changes and improvements to this unit have recently been made:
– Initiation of computer based classes in weeks 1-6 to assist with computer and information literacy skill development
– Move from fortnightly to weekly classes
– Development of additional literacy support documentation to assist students’ completion of written assessments
– Consolidation of multiple weekly quizzes into 2 unit reviews
– Movement of unit content so that it scaffolds and prepares students for content in their own professional units
in Autumn session
– Development of additional case studies that help develop students understanding of professional roles and
obligations
– Unit Reviews changed to 45 minutes duration
– Work Health & Safety Quiz pass mark altered to 80%
3
2 Assessment Information
2.1 Unit Learning Outcomes
Becoming a health science professional requires an understanding of your obligations in response to the expectations
set by the general public and your professional group. This unit aims to introduce you to these responsibilities and
expectation of all health science practitioners and the core competencies expected in health science practice. Upon
successfully completing this unit, you should be able to:
| Outcome | |
| 1 | Recognise, describe and practise skills for ensuring academic success in a health science degree |
| 2 | Practise information literacy skills appropriate for the academic environment |
| 3 | Describe and apply principles to ensure ethical practice in the current academic and future health science environment |
| 4 | Use health related terms and International Classifcation of Functioning (ICF) concepts to demonstrate a holistic understanding of health within the framework of person centred practice |
| 5 | Describe and apply principles of safe practice in the health sciences |
| 6 | Describe and apply the legal responsibilities and obligations of health science professionals |
| 7 | Explain and describe approaches used in inter-professional health science teams |
2.2 Approach to Learning
Attendance It is strongly recommended that you attend all scheduled learning activities to support your learning.
Students with a poor attendance record may fnd themselves at risk of not passing assessment tasks. Unit materials
will be made available on the unit’s vUWS (E-Learning) site. You are expected to consult vUWS at least twice a
week, as all unit announcements will be made via vUWS. Teaching and learning materials will be regularly updated
and posted online. Online Learning Requirements Lecture notes and laboratory worksheets will be made available
on the E-Learning (Blackboard) link on The University home page http://www.westernsydney.edu.au/ Students are
expected to consult the unit Blackboard site at least twice a week, as all announcements will be made via this site
and teaching material will be regularly updated and posted online.
4
2.3 Contribution to Course Learning Outcomes
Western Sydney University Graduate Attributes
Graduate Attributes ULO 1 ULO 2 ULO 3 ULO 4 ULO 5 ULO 6 ULO 7
| 1. Command multiple skills and literacies to enable adaptable lifelong learning | Introduced | Developed | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | ||
| 2. Demonstrate knowledge of Indigenous Australia through cultural competency and professional capacity | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | |||
| 3. Demonstrate comprehensive, coherent and connected knowledge | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced |
| 4. Apply knowledge through intellectual inquiry in professional or applied contexts | Introduced | Introduced | |||||
| 5. Bring knowledge to life through responsible engagement and appreciation of diversity in an evolving world | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced |
5
4656: Bachelor of Health Science
Course Learning Outcomes ULO 1 ULO 2 ULO 3 ULO 4 ULO 5 ULO 6 ULO 7
| 1. Applies in-depth knowledge of the chosen discipline to local and international contexts and the broader health environment. | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | |
| 2. Implement the values and principles of scholarly inquiry and evidence-based practice as they relate to investigating and enhancing health outcomes. | Introduced | Developed | Introduced | ||
| 3. Applies effective oral and written communication skills and utilises and other technologies effectively in client interactions, health service delivery and personal and professional learning. | Introduced | ||||
| 4. Evaluates qualitative and quantitative data to interpret and solve health related problems and apply treatments and/or management solutions. | Introduced | Developed | Introduced | ||
| 5. Practices autonomous and effective learning and relates appropriately to clients and other stakeholders within the health and community context. | Introduced | Introduced | |||
| 6. Respects the culture, experiences and achievements of Indigenous Australians and communicates ethically and effectively within Indigenous Australian contexts. | Introduced | Introduced | |||
| 7. Integrates theoretical and practical knowledge with applied critical, reflective, and creative skills to make informed decisions in professional contexts. | Introduced | ||||
| 8. Engages effectively in advancing knowledge and promoting health both independently and collaboratively. | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | ||
| 9. Models and promotes ethical conduct, intellectual integrity, cultural diversity and social justice principles and professionalism in health contexts. | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced |
| 10. Initiates and contributes positively to sustainable change and improvements in health in a diverse and evolving world. | Introduced | Introduced |
6
2.4 Assessment Summary
The assessment items in this unit are designed to enable you to demonstrate that you have achieved the unit
learning outcomes. Completion and submission of all assessment items which have been designated as mandatory or
compulsory is essential to receive a passing grade.
To pass this unit you must:
– Achieve a PASS in the four competency-based quizzes A, B, C and D – Achieve an overall mark of 50 There are
5 assessment items in this unit, designed to enable you to demonstrate that you have achieved the unit learning
outcomes.
| Item | Weight | Due Date | ULOs Assessed | Threshold |
| Four Online Competency Quizzes | S/U | Quiz A: Week 3 Friday 20th March at 5pm, Quiz B: Bring printed WH&S certifcate to your tutorial class in Week 5, Quiz C: Week 10 Friday 8th May at 5pm, Quiz D: Week 13, Friday 29th May at 5pm | 1-5 | Yes |
| Annotated Bibliography | 30% | Week 7 Friday 17th April at 5pm | 1-3 | No |
| Case Study Assignment | 40% | Week 14 Friday 5th June at 5pm | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 | No |
| Unit Reviews | 20% | Review 1: Week 8, Friday 24th April at 5pm; Review 2: Week 14, Friday 5th June at 5pm | 1-7 | No |
| Participation | 10% | In tutorials in Weeks 3-8, 10-14 | 1-7 | No |
Feedback on Assessment
Feedback is an important part of the learning process that can improve your progress towards achieving the learning
outcomes. Feedback is any written or spoken response made in relation to academic work such as an assessment
task, a performance or product. It can be given to you by a teacher, an external assessor or student peer, and may
be given individually or to a group of students. As a Western Sydney University student, it is your responsibility to
seek out and act on feedback that is provided to you as a resource to further your learning.
7
2.5 Assessment Details
2.5.1 Four Online Competency Quizzes
| Weight: | S/U |
| Type of Collaboration: | Individual |
| Due: | Quiz A: Week 3 Friday 20th March at 5pm, Quiz B: Bring printed WH&S certifcate to your tutorial class in Week 5, Quiz C: Week 10 Friday 8th May at 5pm, Quiz D: Week 13, Friday 29th May at 5pm |
| Submission: | Modules and quiz are available on vUWS |
| Format: | Four Online Competency Quizzes. Complete and submit these via vUWS. |
| Length: | MCQs, Untimed, repeated attempts allowed, 20 questions |
| Curriculum Mode: | Quiz |
| Threshold Detail: | These are compulsory pass/fail quizzes; you must achieve a pass mark of 18/20 or 80% depending on the quiz you are attempting in order to pass the quiz, and pass the unit. You can repeat the quiz as many times as you wish until you achieve the pass mark. |
These are compulsory pass/fail quizzes; you must achieve a pass mark of 18/20 or 80% depending on the quiz you
are attempting in order to pass the quiz, and pass the unit. You can repeat the quiz as many times as you wish until
you achieve the pass mark.
These quizzes are all on-line. You will have learned how to use the ’quiz’ function in vUWS during your tutorial class.
You should complete the quizzes independently so that you can be confdent you understand the material and can
accurately apply the correct procedure to a given scenario.
On-line Quiz A: Successful Searching Quiz
Due Date: Wk 3 Friday 20th March at 5pm
Length: Six modules and one quiz
Submission Details: Modules and quiz are available in the vUWS site
Feedback details: The quiz score is available immediately after the quiz has been submitted. Students are required
to obtain a mark of at least 18 out of 20 in order to pass this quiz. The quiz may be reattempted multiple times
until the pass mark of 18/20 is achieved.
Rationale
Being a university student involves fnding, interpreting and evaluating information to use in the assessments. It
also involves managing and referencing citations accurately using a standard formatting style, such as the American
Psychological Association (APA).
The ’successful searching’ library tutorial is made up of six (6) modules that aim to develop these skills and thereby,
8
help you to secure success as a university student. These modules include:
– Getting started (in fnding relevant information)
– Interpreting a reading list
– Finding more information
– Evaluating information
– Managing citations
– Plagiarism
Task
– Go to vUWS site of the unit.
– In vUWS, click on the folder called ’Assessments” then “ Assessment 1 – Quizzes” then “ Successful Searching
Quiz” .
– Complete each of the six (6) modules. Then complete the quiz on vUWS. If you fail the quiz you should repeat
the module and re-do the quiz until a PASS grade is achieved (a mark of at least 18/20). You can repeat the
quiz as many times as needed to achieve a PASS.
– Once you have passed the quiz, your PASS grade will be automatically registered on vUWS.
On-line Quiz B. Western Sydney Work Health and Safety (WHS) Quiz
Due Date: Bring printed WH&S certifcate to your tutorial class in Week 5
Length: Five modules and fve mini quizzes.
Submission Details: Modules and quizzes are available in the vUWS site called ’School of Science and Health WHS
Induction 2018’. You will have access to this site from the beginning of session. Once in the site click on the tab
called ’Health Science’.
This folder contains 5 separate modules and quizzes related to work health and safety at Western Sydney University.
You will need to review each module and then complete the short quiz that follows.
That means that in total you will need to complete 5 short module-specifc quizzes. A mark of 80% is required to
pass each quiz. When you achieve 80% for Module/Quiz 1, Module /Quiz 2 will open. When you complete 80% for
Module/Quiz 2, Module/Quiz 3 will open and so on. This is how you will work through each of the fve modules and
quizzes. As these are competency-based quizzes a pass mark of 80% will be required for each of them.
If not achieved on the frst attempt, please re-attempt the quiz until you achieve this score.
When you achieve 80% at the end of Module/Quiz 5 a certifcate will be produced. Please bring this certifcate to
your tutorial class in Week 5.
Rationale
Being part of the Western Sydney University, students are required to be aware of Work Health and Safety requirements. Furthermore, as such requirements are essential in any health care or educational setting, knowledge of WHS
requirements will prepare students for their future roles as health professionals. The WHS on-line modules aim to
develop students’ knowledge regarding health and safety in the workplace and university environment.
Task
9
– Go to vUWS site called ’School of Science and Health WHS Induction 2018’. Once in the site click on the tab
called ’Health Science’.
– Review each module and then complete the short quiz that follows. When you achieve 80% for Module/Quiz
1, Module /Quiz 2 will open. When you complete 80% for Module/Quiz 2, Module/Quiz 3 will open and so
on. This is how you will work through each of the fve modules and quizzes.
– When you achieve 80% in the fnal quiz a certifcate will be produced. Bring this certifcate to your tutorial in
Week 5.
On-line Quiz C: Infection Control in Health Practice
Due Date: Wk. 10 Friday 8th May at 5pm
Length: Review Australian Infection Control guidelines and complete one quiz
Submission Details: Guidelines and quiz are available in the vUWS site
Feedback details: The quiz score is available immediately after the quiz has been submitted. Students are required
to obtain a mark of at least 18 out of 20 in order to pass this quiz. The quiz may be reattempted multiple times
until the pass mark of 18/20 is achieved.
Rationale
As a health science student and practitioner, students are required to be aware of (a) the risks, rights and responsibilities relating to the role; (b) guidelines, regulations and the law as mechanisms to provide a framework for safe
practice; and (c) principles of infection control: your obligations on placement.
This quiz ensures you have gained awareness in these aspects, hence, achieved Learning Outcome 5 and 6 of the unit.
Task
– Go to the vUWS site of the unit.
– In vUWS, click on the folder called ’Assessment for this Unit” then “ Assessment 1 – Quizzes” then ’Infection
Control in Health Practice’.
– View the on-line resources on infection control procedures and then complete the quiz. If you fail the quiz you
should view the resources and re-do the quiz until a PASS grade is achieved (a mark of at least 18/20). You
can repeat the quiz as many times as needed to achieve a PASS.
– Once you have achieved a PASS, your grade will be automatically registered on vUWS.
On-line Quiz D: Child Protection Policy and Procedure
Due Date: Wk. 13 Friday 29th May at 5pm
Length: Review national child protection guidelines and complete one quiz
Submission Details: Guidelines and quiz are available in the vUWS site
10
Feedback details: The quiz score is available immediately after the quiz has been submitted. Students are required
to obtain a mark of at least 18 out of 20 in order to pass this quiz. The quiz may be reattempted multiple times
until the pass mark of 18/20 is achieved.
Rationale
As a health science student and practitioner, students are required to be aware of (a) the risks, rights and responsibilities relating to the role; (b) guidelines, regulations and the law as mechanisms to provide a framework for safe
practice; and (c) principles of Child Protection: your responsibilities.
This quiz ensures you have gained awareness in these aspects, hence, achieved Learning Outcome 6 of the unit.
Task
– Go to the vUWS site of the unit.
– In vUWS, click on the folder called ’Assessment for this Unit” then “Assessment 1 – Quizzes” then “Child
Protection Policy and Procedure” .
– Read the set of documents to do with Child protection policy and procedure in Australia and then complete the
quiz related to the readings. If you fail the quiz you should view the resources and re-do the quiz until a PASS
grade is achieved (a mark of at least 18/20). You can repeat the quiz as many times as needed to achieve a
PASS.
– Once you have achieved a PASS, your grade will be automatically registered on vUWS
Resources:
These quizzes are all on-line. You will have learned how to use the ’quiz’ function in vUWS during your tutorial class.
You should complete the quizzes independently so that you can be confdent you understand the material and can
accurately apply the correct procedure to a given scenario.
11
Marking Criteria:
These quizzes are marked on the basis of pass/fail. You must achieve a pass mark of 18/20 or 80% depending on
the quiz you are attempting in order to pass the quiz, and pass the unit. You can repeat the quiz as many times as
needed to achieve the pass mark.
12
2.5.2 Annotated Bibliography
| Weight: | 30% |
| Type of Collaboration: | Individual |
| Due: | Week 7 Friday 17th April at 5pm |
| Submission: | Through the Turnitin link for your tutor in the 400871 vUWS site |
| Format: | Recommended structure for the annotated bibliography Title for the annotated bibliography: state the health condition you have selected for this bibliography PART 1: Search Strategy: provide answers to specifc sections of the template relating to what search strategies you used to fnd your 4 publications PART 2: Annotations Citation for publication 1: provide the reference for this publication, using APA referencing style Summary of publication 1: state the type of publication, its source, articulate the purpose of the publication, and summarise the author(s)’ main points/arguments as presented in the publication, the evidence the author(s) used in supporting the main points and their conclusions on the health condition. Evaluation of publication 1: evaluate the publication, using each of these criteria: authority (author and/or source), currency, justifcation of main points and conclusions, the alignment of main points and conclusions with intended purpose and contributions of the publication to understanding of the health condition (clinical presentation, development of the condition and/or treatment methods) Citation for publication 2: … Summary of publication 2: … Evaluation of publication 2: … Citation for publication 3: … Summary of publication 3: … Evaluation of publication 3: … Citation for publication 4: … Summary of publication 4 … Evaluation of publication 4 … Reference list: include a reference list for all the publications you have used in the bibliography, using APA referencing style. Please note that the word limit for the Annotated Bibliography is 1000 words. Over 10% outside the word limit will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment. Citations for the four publications and the reference list at the end of the Annotated Bibliography are not counted towards the word limit. Please see the assessment resource on how to write up an annotated bibliography located on vUWS for more detailed instructions and guidance. |
| Length: | 1,000 words |
| Curriculum Mode: | Annotated Bibliography |
Length: 1000 words (This word limit does not include the bibliographic reference above each annotation and the
reference list. Ten percent above or below this amount is allowable without penalty. Over 10% outside the word limit
will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment)..
13
Feedback details: Online feedback will be made available in week 11 and a discussion of the overall class strengths
and weaknesses will occur in week 11. Students are encouraged to read through and consider their feedback when
preparing future assignments.
Rationale
This assessment item enables you to:
– demonstrate profciency in using the standard functions of vUWS
– demonstrate profciency in accessing learning resources on vUWS and in the library
– demonstrate competent use of text-matching software, such as Turnitin, to enhance academic integrity
– accurately identify and use common medical, health and health policy terminologies
– use library searching strategies to locate publications relating to a health topic
– critically interpret and evaluate health information
– use referencing and citation conventions in the health sciences
These aspects are closely related to the Unit Learning Outcomes 1, 2 and 3.
Task
You will be expected to go through 4 steps in accomplishing this assessment item, as follows.
Step 1: Choose one of the following clinical conditions:
– Osteoarthritis (OA)
– Dementia
– Attention defcit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
– Epilepsy
– Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
– Asthma
– Drug addiction
– Schizophrenia
– Chronic Renal Failure
– Hypercholesterolemia
– Sciatica
– Depression
– Down syndrome (DS)
– Anxiety disorder
– Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI)
– Alcoholism
– Obsessive compulsive disorder
– Angina or Congestive Cardiac Failure
– Anorexia Nervosa
– Autism or Asperger’s Spectrum Disorder
Each condition has been selected because it has a high community prevalence or high community impact. As a health
science professional you are therefore likely to come across students, clients or community members who have one
of these conditions at some time in your student or graduate career. Choose the one that most interests you and/or
is most relevant to your future professional role. In Assessment 3 – Case study, you will be required to describe
an intervention you may use as a health professional in your feld for someone with this condition. This annotated
bibliography will help develop your understanding of this condition in preparation for the case study assignment.
Step 2: Using the library searching skills you have developed through this unit, fnd the following 4 publications that
will provide information to help you better understand this condition:
14
– 1 academic journal article
– 1 government publication
– 1 professional book or book chapter
– 1 podcast (from a reputable source such as ABC Radio or the World Health Organisation)
Ensure that you search for information from scholarly or reputable sources.
Step 3: Prepare an annotated bibliography on the clinical condition using the 4 publications. This assignment should
be completed in the template provided in the vUWS site. The annotated bibliography template is in a word document
format. You can type your assignment directly into the template. As you begin the assignment make sure you ’save
as’ onto your own computer or usb with a different fle name containing the assignment title, your name and your
student number eg. “Annotated Bibliography Nicole Kidman 12345432” . Please use the template to ensure
you complete all required sections of the annotated bibliography assignment. The template contains the following
structure for writing up the annotated bibliography assignment.
Please note that the word limit for the Annotated Bibliography is 1000 words. Over 10% outside the word
limit will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment. Citations for the four
publications and the reference list at the end of the Annotated Bibliography are not counted towards the
word limit.
Please see the assessment resource on how to write up an annotated bibliography located on vUWS for more detailed
instructions and guidance.
Step 4: Submit your assignment online through Turnitin. Make sure that the title of your assignment contains your
name and student number. For example: ”NicoleKidman98765432AnnotatedBibliography”. An assignment coversheet is not required for online assignment submission.
15
Marking Criteria:
| Criteria | Unsatisfactory | Expected performance | High Performance | Excellent performance | Outstanding performance |
| Summary of each publication covering: – text type – purpose – main points and/or arguments – evidence – conclusions | Summary misses most required elements Over-reliance on the original, such as excessive use of direct quotes and/or paraphrasing repeating more than 25% of the original. | Attempts to summarise most elements of each publication, though the summary may contain irrelevant information or miss some key details relating to the elements. Attempt to use own words, with some use of direct quotes; paraphrasing contains less than 25% of the original. | Summary covers all required elements; though summary can be lengthy and/or miss some key information. Uses own words, with minimal use of direct quotes; paraphrasing mostly independent from the original. | A clear summary covers all elements, prioritising key information and omitting most details not integral to the elements. Summary is generally independent from the original, with some useful interpretation of the author’s main points and conclusions on the health condition. | A clear and concise summary covers all elements, prioritising key information and omitting all details not integral to the elements. Summary is completely independent from the original, with insightful interpretation of the author’s main points and conclusions on the health condition. |
| 6 marks | 1-2 | 3-3.5 | 4-4.25 | 4.5-5 | 6 |
| Evaluation of each publication based on: – authority – currency – justifcation of main points and conclusions – main points and conclusions aligned with intended purpose – contributions | Limited evaluation that misses most criteria and/or contains invalid information for most criteria. | Basic evaluation draws on all criteria, however, comments on some criteria can be simplistic. Comments relate to individual publications only. | Detailed evaluation draws on all criteria, with some thoughtful comments on the justifcation of information, alignment with intended purpose and contributions of the publication to understanding of the health condition. Comments relate to individual publications only. | Clear and detailed evaluation draws on all criteria, with thoughtful comments on the justifcation of information, alignment with intended purpose and contributions of the publication to understanding of the health condition. Comments make some link across the 4 publications. | In-depth evaluation draws on all criteria, with insightful comments on the accuracy of information and contributions of the publication to understanding of the health condition. Comments make clear link and comparisons across the 4 publications. |
| 6 marks | 1-2 | 3-3.5 | 4-4.25 | 4.5-5 | 6 |
| Completion of the search strategies template | No or very little completion of the search strategy section of template AND/OR the template is completed with invalid information | The template is mostly completed that: Identifes some search terms relevant to the assignment; Uses one Boolean operators correct to group terms; Identifes one relevant source for each publication; Identifes some relevant limiters; Identifes some criteria for selecting suitable publications | All sections in the template are completed that: Identifes some search terms highly relevant to the assignment; Uses both Boolean operators correctly to group terms; Identifes relevant sources for the publications, some publications with more than one source; Identifes some highly relevant limiters; Identifes some key criteria for selecting suitable publications. | All sections in the template are clearly completed that: Identifes a range of search terms highly relevant to the assignment; Uses Boolean operators and truncation correctly to group terms; Identifes more than one highly relevant sources for each publication; Identifes a range of highly relevant limiters; Identifes a range of key criteria for selecting suitable publications. | All sections in the template are clearly and concisely completed that: Identifes a range of search terms pertinent to the assignment; Uses Boolean operators and truncation correctly and effciently to group terms; Identifes a range of highly relevant sources for each publication; Identifes a range of highly relevant and effcient limiters; Identifes a range of well-developed criteria for selecting suitable publications. |
| 6 marks | 1-2 | 3-3.5 | 4-4.25 | 4.5-5 | 6 |
| Academic writing skills: | Bibliography is disorganised; annotation paragraphs have no clear point and/or structure. Non-conventional spelling, punctuation and grammar interfere with meaning. Limited use of academic vocabulary and expressions. | Attempts to structure the bibliography, however, information in paragraphs may vary from the topic sentence. Frequent errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar but they do not interfere with meaning. Attempts to use academic vocabulary and expressions, though with occasional errors. | Bibliography is mostly well constructed; paragraphs may include some information varying from the topic sentence. Occasional errors in spelling, punctuations, and grammar. Suffcient use of academic vocabulary and expressions, may be with some errors. | Bibliography is generally well constructed with clear paragraphs. Conventional spelling, grammar and punctuation, with some minor errors. Competent use of academic vocabulary and expressions, maybe with some minor errors only. | Bibliography is consistently well constructed with clear and concise paragraphs. Conventional spelling, grammar and punctuation, maybe with some typos only. Advanced use of academic vocabulary and expressions. |
| 6 marks | 1-2 | 3-3.5 | 4-4.25 | 4.5-5 | 6 |
16
| Criteria | Unsatisfactory | Expected performance | High Performance | Excellent performance | Outstanding performance |
| Reference formatting | References not according to APA style, with frequent errors. | APA style used incon sistently, with some major errors including some key information (Au thor/year/title no./pages) missing from the citation; the incorrect order of information in the citation, or reference list not in alphabetical order or not containing hanging indents. | /vol Referencing mostly follows APA style, with some minor errors only. Minor errors includes the misplacement or omission of full stops, commas, capitalisation, italics, or brackets. | Referencing generally follows APA style, with minimal minor errors only. | Referencing consistently follows APA style, with no errors. |
| 6 marks | 1-2 | 3-3.5 | 4-4.25 | 4.5-5 | 6 |
| Tentative Mark | out of 30 |
DEDUCTIONS
| Word limit | Is above the word limit by more than 100 words (10%) (word count does not including references/reference list) | Deduct 2 marks |
| Late Turnitin Submission | Deduct 10% of the assignment’s worth for each day the assignment is late (incl. Sat/Sun) (ref: UWS Assessment Policy) | Deduct 3 marks per each day |
FINAL MARK out of 30
17
2.5.3 Case Study Assignment
| Weight: | 40% |
| Type of Collaboration: | Individual |
| Due: | Week 14 Friday 5th June at 5pm |
| Submission: | Through the Turnitin link in the 400871 vUWS site. An assignment coversheet is not required for online assignment submission |
| Format: | Recommended structure for the case study Section 1: Description of the case (200 words) In this section, you will be expected to describe a person’s condition and how the condition, when combined with contextual factors, impacts on his/her level of functioning in terms of impairments, daily activity limitations and social participation restrictions. You will be expected to use ICF components in your description. Section 2: Description and justifcation of your intervention∗ (450words) In this section, you will be required to: a. defne your role as a health professional (either in direct client service delivery or as an administrator of a heath service organisation or public health professional) b. identify and describe an intervention∗ you may offer in the role you have defned to promote this person’s level of functioning (either in direct service delivery to the client or in administration or public health. Use scholarly ∗∗ publications/references to support your choice of intervention. c. identify what components of the ICF your intervention may target. d. identify any risks involved with the intervention and describe two strategies that will help to minimise these risks. ∗ An intervention refers to something you do as a health professional to assist the person (client/patient) or population group. It can include a treatment, activity, project, initiative, program or a service. ∗∗ Scholarly publications refer to academic references (books/journal articles) that are trustworthy and credible. With regard to websites, only publications from .gov or .edu are permitted. Section 3: Identifcation of another health professional in the team and description of his/her role (300 words) In this section, you will be required to: a. identify and describe the role of another health professional who is also working with this person/population group as part of the inter-professional team. b. specify what components of the ICF this role may target. Use scholarly publications to support this section. Section 4: Specifcation of professionalism characteristics (300 words) Choose 3 characteristics of professionalism and describe how you will demonstrate these when conducting your intervention as described in Section 2. Use scholarly publications to support your description of professional characteristics. Section 5: Description and justifcation of person-centred/ population-centred strategies (250 words) Describe 2 strategies you will implement to ensure that your practice is person-centred/population-centred. Use scholarly publications to support your strategies. |
| Length: | 1,500 words |
| Curriculum Mode: | Case Study |
18
Due Date: Week 14 Friday 5th June at 5pm
Length: 1500 words (excluding reference list). Ten percent above this amount is allowable without penalty. Over
10% outside the word limit will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment.
Submission Details: Through the Turnitin link in the 400871 vUWS site. An assignment coversheet is not required
for online assignment submission
Feedback details: Online feedback will be made available after results are released for the unit. Students are
encouraged to read through and consider their feedback when preparing future assignments.
Rationale
This assessment item requires you to:
– access learning resources on vUWS and via the library website and appropriately reference these learning
resources
– use common medical, health and health policy terminology accurately
– identify and describe a clinical condition relating to a person accurately using ICF components correctly
– describe the roles and activities of relevant members of an inter-professional team, using ICF components.
– identify and describe the risks associated in health science practice and specify strategies to minimise the risks
– identify and describe characteristic features of professionalism in the day to day activities of health science
practice
– describe and apply a client-centred practice approach to health science practice
These aspects are closely related to the Unit Learning Outcomes 1 to 7.
Task
This case study assignment will require you to apply aspects of professional health science practice to a case study
created by you. You will be required to select one of the clinical conditions listed for the annotated bibliography and
write up a case study of a person with that clinical condition. You may choose the same condition that you used for
the annotated bibliography; however this is not a requirement. You are strongly recommended to use the following
structure in writing up your case study.
19
Marking Criteria:
| Criteria | Unsatisfactory | Expected performance | High Performance | Excellent performance | Outstanding performance |
| Description of the case | Limited description that fails to provide an accurate account of the case regarding condition, relevant contextual factors and their impact on the person’s functioning. Limited use of ICF components. | Attempts to describe the person’s condition, relevant contextual factors and their impact on his/her functioning, though the description is superfcial at times. Attempts to use ICF components, with some inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies. | Detailed and accurate description of the condition, relevant contextual factors and their impact on the person’s functioning, though may lack in clarity at times. Competent use of ICF components, with some minor inconsistencies only. | Clear, concise and accurate description of the condition, all relevant contextual factors and thoughtful impact on the person’s functioning. Advanced use of ICF components, with no errors. | Comprehensive and accurate description of the condition; thoughtful identifcation of relevant contextual factors and insightful discussion of their impact on the person’s functioning. Effective use of ICF components that highlights key aspects of the case. |
| 5 marks | 0-2 | 2.5-3 | 3.5 | 4 | 5 |
| Description and justifcation of your intervention | No or limited defnition of the role. Limited description and justifcation of the intervention; or the intervention is invalid. Limited reference to the ICF components. Limited discussion of potential risks and minimisation strategies, or the discussion is invalid. | Basic defnition of the role, with some incorrect information about the role. Attempts to describe a basic intervention relevant to the role, though the justifcation is simplistic. Suffcient reference to ICF components. Attempts to identify some relevant risks and 2 minimisations strategies; though the strategies are basic. Uses at least 3 scholarly references. | Detailed defnition of the role, though some information might be incorrect. Detailed description of a working intervention relevant to the role, with a detailed justifcation. Frequent and accurate reference to ICF components. Most relevant risks are identifed, with 2 thoughtful minimisations strategies. Uses at least 4 scholarly references. | Clear, concise and accurate description of the role. Clear and concise description of a well developed intervention for the role, with thoughtful justifcation. Accurate and consistent reference to ICF components. Accurately identifes all risks, with 2 well-developed minimisation strategies. Uses a range of scholarly references. | Succinct and accurate description of the role Comprehensive description of an insightful and well developed intervention for the role, with insightful justifcation. Consistent, clear and accurate links to the ICF components. Accurately identifes risks that are pertinent to the intervention, with 2 insightful minimisation strategies. Uses a wide range of scholarly references. |
| 12 marks | 0-5.5 | 6-7 | 8 | 9-10 | 11-12 |
| Identifcation of another health professional and description of his/her role | No attempt to identify another health professional, or the professional is remotely relevant in the team. Limited description of the role, with no link to ICF components. | Identifes another professional, though his/her role is not directly relevant to the team or your role. Basic description of his/her role with some reference to ICF components. Uses some scholarly references. | Correctly identifes another professional relevant to the team and/or your role. Detailed description of his/her role, with frequent reference to ICF components. Uses suffcient scholarly references. | Correctly identifes another professional who is highly relevant to the team and your role. Clear and concise description of his/her role, with accurate and consistent reference to ICF components. Uses a range of scholarly references. | Correctly identifes another professional who is signifcant to the team and your role. Comprehensive description of his/her role, with consistent, clear and accurate links to ICF components. Uses a wide range of scholarly references. |
| 7 marks | 0-3 | 3.5-4 | 5 | 5.5 | 6-7 |
| Specifcation of professionalism characteristics | Specifes less than three characteristics, or the plan for implementing these is limitedly integrated with the intervention. | Specifes three relevant characteristics, with a basic plan for implementing them in practice. Use some scholarly references | Specifes three characteristics that are highly relevant to the intervention and profession, with a detailed plan for their implementation in practice. Uses suffcient scholarly references | Specifes three characteristics that are pertinent to the intervention and profession, with a thoughtful plan for their implementation in practice. Uses a range of scholarly references | Specifes three characteristics that are signifcant to the intervention and profession, with insightful initiatives for ensuring them in practice. Uses a wide range of scholarly references. |
| 8 marks | 0-3 | 4-5 | 5.5 | 6 | 7-8 |
| Description and justifcation of person-centred strategies | Identifes less than 2 strategies to promote person-centred practice, with limited justifcation; or the strategies are invalid. | 2 person-centred strategies are identifed with basic description and justifcation. Attempts to use scholarly references | Detailed description of 2 strategies that are likely to promote person-centred practice, with detailed justifcation. Uses scholarly references. | Clear and concise description of 2 thoughtful strategies for promoting person-centredness, with thoughtful justifcation. Uses a range of scholarly references | Comprehensive description of 2 insightful and well-developed strategies for promoting person-centredness, with insightful justifcation. Uses a wide range of scholarly references |
| 4 marks | 0-1 | 2 | 2.75 | 3 | 4 |
20
| Criteria | Unsatisfactory | Expected performance | High Performance | Excellent performance | Outstanding performance |
| Academic writing skills | Assignment is disorganised; paragraphs have no clear point and/or structure. References not according to APA style, with frequent errors. Non-conventional spelling, punctuation and grammar interfere with meaning. Limited use of academic vocabulary and expressions. | Attempts to structure the assignment, however, paragraphs may contain irrelevant contents. APA style used inconsistently. Some references missing or incorrect. Frequent errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar but they do not interfere with meaning. Attempts to use academic vocabulary and expressions, though with occasional errors | Assignment is mostly well constructed; paragraphs mostly contain relevant contents. Referencing mostly follows APA style, with some errors only. Occasional errors in spelling, punctuations, and grammar. Suffcient use of academic vocabulary and expressions, may be with some errors. | Assignment is generally well constructed with clear paragraphs. Referencing generally follows APA style, with some minor errors only. Conventional spelling, grammar and punctuation, with some minor errors. Competent use of academic vocabulary and expressions, maybe with some minor errors only. | Assignment is consistently well constructed with clear and concise paragraphs. Referencing consistently follows APA style, with no errors. . Conventional spelling, grammar and punctuation, maybe with some typos only. Advanced use of academic vocabulary and expressions. |
| 4 marks | 0-1 | 2 | 2.75 | 3 | 4 |
| Tentative Mark | out of 40 |
DEDUCTIONS
| Word limit | Is under or above the word limit by more than 150 words (10%) (word count does not including references/reference list) | Deduct 2 marks |
| Late Turnitin Submission | Deduct 10% of the assignment’s worth for each day the assignment is late (incl. Sat/Sun) (ref: UWS Assessment Policy) | Deduct 3 marks per each day |
FINAL MARK: out of 40
21
2.5.4 Unit Reviews
| Weight: | 20% |
| Type of Collaboration: | Individual |
| Due: | Review 1: Week 8, Friday 24th April at 5pm; Review 2: Week 14, Friday 5th June at 5pm |
| Submission: | online via vUWS |
| Format: | Unit reviews will comprise of up to 30 questions. Students will have 45 minutes to complete the quiz online via vUWS. |
| Length: | 2 quizzes, 10% each, 45 minutes each |
| Curriculum Mode: | Multiple Choice |
The unit reviews are designed to test your understanding of content given in lectures and tutorials midway through
the semester (week 8) and at the end of semester (week 14). Students will be required to complete two unit reviews.
Each review will be in a quiz format and will be located on the 400871 vUWS site. The Week 8 Unit Review will
assess content from weeks 3-7 and the Week 14 Unit Review will assess content from weeks 8, 10-14. Unit reviews
will comprise of up to 30 questions. Students will have 30 minutes to complete the quiz online via vUWS. It is
expected that you spend roughly 1.5 hours preparing for each quiz by reviewing relevant lecture & tutorial notes and
readings.
| 2 Unit Reviews: Review 1 Due: Week 8, Friday 24th April at 5pm Review 2 Due: Week 14, Friday 5th June at 5pm | Will assess content from: wks 3-7 ; wks 8, 10-14 |
Resources:
Content given in lectures and tutorials face-to-face and on vUWS.
22
2.5.5 Participation
| Weight: | 10% |
| Type of Collaboration: | Individual |
| Due: | In tutorials in Weeks 3-8, 10-14 |
| Submission: | During weekly tutorials |
| Format: | In-class participation |
| Length: | 11 weeks |
| Curriculum Mode: | Participation |
Student participation in each weekly face to face or online tutorials will be assessed out of 10 marks by their tutor.
The student’s overall tutorial participation grade will be the average of the marks they receive in Weeks 3-8, 10-14
tutorials.
Students will be assessed according to:
– The student’s preparedness for tutorials, including being on time and completing pre-tutorial activities and/or
worksheets;
– The quality of the student’s contributions to the tutorial activity/discussion;
– The quality of the student’s interaction with the tutor and other tutorial participants
Warning: During computer-based tutorials students are not to open un-related web-based sites such as personal
mail or facebook. Students found to be doing this will be at risk of failing the participation requirements for that
tutorial class.
Note: If students are unable to attend a tutorial, they should complete a special consideration form (up to two days
after the tutorial) and submit it to Student Central. Special consideration will only be granted in extreme cases of
misadventure or illness
Note: If special consideration is granted, the student’s mark for the week will be calculated based on the mean
tutorial participation mark for other weeks which they attended tutorials for the unit.
For example, if the student achieves a 6 in week 3, a 7 in week 4 and an 8 in week 5, but they are absent in week
6 and are granted special consideration, the students mark for week 6 will be an average of the preceding marks ie
-6+7+8=21/3=7
Warning: If a student does not attend a tutorial and is not granted special consideration approval, then the student
will receive a zero mark for the tutorial for the week they were absent
Resources:
Tutorial class
23
Marking Criteria:
| Criteria | Unsatisfactory | Expected performance 5-6 marks | High Performance 6.5-7marks | Excellent performance 7.5-8marks | Outstanding performance 8.5-10 marks |
| Preparedness for tutorials | Absent, or misses more than 15 minutes of the tutorial. No attempt to complete the pre-tutorial work. | Completes pre-tutorial worksheet/activities or but with limited effort | Completes pre-tutorial worksheets/activities with good detail, maybe with some errors. | Completes pre-tutorial work, in details and with no errors. | Completes all the work, with in-depth ideas and discussions. |
| Contributions to tutorial activity and/or discussion | Limited focus on the task. Comments are generally not scholarly or relevant to the discussion. | Contributions make some relevant points, although they are anecdotal with little use of literature/readings | Contributions are informed by reading and reflection and not only personal opinion. Engages with others’ views and contribute to the discussion in a constructive way. | Contributions are thoughtful, informed by signifcant reading and reflection. Contributions extend the discussion. | Contributions are informed by extensive reading and critical reflection. Contributions advance the discussion. |
| Interaction with tutor and other participants | Is disruptive or rude. Easily distracted. | Interacts appropriately and constructively with group members and the tutor. | Interacts and engages actively, appropriately and constructively with group members and the tutor. | Interacts and engages actively, appropriately and constructively with group members and the tutor. Is attentive to others, shows interest. | Interacts and engages actively, appropriately and constructively with group members and the tutor. Is attentive to others, shows interest and acknowledges their contributions |
24
2.6 General Submission Requirements
Submission
– All assignments must be submitted by the specifed due date and time.
– Complete your assignment and follow the individual assessment item instructions on how to submit. You must
keep a copy of all assignments submitted for marking.
Turnitin
– The Turnitin plagiarism prevention system may be used within this unit. Turnitin is accessed via logging into
vUWS for the unit. If Turnitin is being used with this unit, this means that your assignments have to be
submitted through the Turnitin system. Turnitin from iParadigms is a web-based text-matching software that
identifes and reports on similarities between documents. It is also widely utilised as a tool to improve academic
writing skills. Turnitin compares electronically submitted papers against the following:
– Current and archived web: Turnitin currently contains over 24 billion web pages including archived pages
– Student papers: including Western Sydney University student submissions since 2007
– Scholarly literature: Turnitin has partnered with leading content publishers, including library databases,
text-book publishers, digital reference collections and subscription-based publications (e.g. Gale, Proquest, Emerald and Sage)
– Turnitin is used by over 30 universities in Australia and is increasingly seen as an industry standard. It is
an important tool to assist students with their academic writing by promoting awareness of plagiarism.By
submitting your assignment to Turnitin you will be certifying that:
– I hold a copy of this assignment if the original is lost or damaged
– No part of this assignment has been copied from any other student’s work or from any other source except
where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment
– No part of the assignment has been written for me by any other person/s
– I have complied with the specifed word length for this assignment
– I am aware that this work may be reproduced and submitted to plagiarism detection software programs for
the purpose of detecting possible plagiarism (which may retain a copy on its database for future plagiarism
checking).
Self-Plagiarising
– You are to ensure that no part of any submitted assignment for this unit or product has been submitted by
yourself in another (previous or current) assessment from any unit, except where appropriately referenced, and
with prior permission from the Lecturer/Tutor/Unit Co-ordinator of this unit.
Late Submission
– If you submit a late assessment, without receiving approval for an extension of time, (see next item), you will
be penalised by 10% per day for up to 10 days. In other words, marks equal to 10% of the assignment’s weight
will be deducted from the mark awarded.
– For example, if the highest mark possible is 50, 5 marks will be deducted from your awarded mark for each late
day.
– Saturday and Sunday are counted as one calendar day each.
– Assessments will not be accepted after the marked assessment task has been returned to students.
– This is consistent with Clause 51 of the Western Sydney University’s Assessment Policy – Criteria and StandardsBased Assessment.
25
Extension of Due Date for Submission
Extensions are only granted in exceptional circumstances. To apply for an extension of time, locate an application
form via the Western Sydney University homepage or copy the following link:
https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/forms
Application forms must be submitted to the Unit Coordinator/Convenor. Requests for extension should be made as
early as possible and submitted within policy deadlines. Appropriate, supporting documentation must be submitted
with the application. An application for an extension does not automatically mean that an extension will be granted.
Assessments will not be accepted after the marked assessment task has been returned to students.
Resubmission
Resubmission of assessment items will not normally be granted if requested.
Application for Special Consideration
It is strongly recommended that you attend all scheduled learning activities to support your learning. If you have
suffered misadventure, illness, or you have experienced exceptional circumstances that have prevented your attendance
at class or your completion and submission of assessment tasks, you may need to apply for Special Consideration via the
Western Sydney University website. http://www.westernsydney.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/services_
and_facilities/special_consideration2 or the Student Centre/Sydney City Campus Reception. Special Consideration
is not automatically granted. It is your responsibility to ensure that any missed content has been covered. Your
lecturer will give you more information on how this must be done.
26
3 Teaching and Learning Activities
| Weeks | Lecture | Tutorial | Readings | Assessments Due |
| Week 1 02-03-2020 | Introduction to the unit, rationale for interprofessional education (IPE) – Health professional defned. | Computer Labs Unit orientation, vUWS navigation University communication and email | Freegard, H. (2012). What is a health professional? In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp. 2-10). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. | |
| Week 2 09-03-2020 | UWS Library – services, information literacy strategies and University Academic Literacy | Computer Labs Time management strategies vUWS quizzes | LIBRARY TOUR – In week 1 these are conducted every hour, on the hour from 10am-4pm (ask at the library information desk) | |
| Week 3 16-03-2020 | Turnitin – Academic Integrity & Honesty. What Turnitin is and how we use it | Computer Labs Library Searching activity | What is Turnitin and how does it work? Writing workshops to help develop your reading and paraphrasing skills are offered by student support Download the UWS Library site APA Referencing Guide available on the vUWS or from the UWS Library referencing webpage | – Four Online Competency Quizzes – Participation |
| Week 4 23-03-2020 | Self care and well being as a student and future health professional | Computer Labs Referencing your sources using APA Style | Additional resources will be identifed in vUWS Support services available at Western include counselling services, mental health and well-being resources, disability support services and welfare services (fnancial hardship, accommodation diffculties, advocacy). These services are confdential and free of charge. | – Participation |
| Week 5 30-03-2020 | Professionalism in the Health Sciences: Characteristics, obligations, expectations | Computer Labs Library Searching Activity | Thistlethwaite, J. & McKimm, J. (2015). Professionalism in context. In Health care professionalism at a glance (pp. 2-10). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. | – Four Online Competency Quizzes – Participation |
27
| Weeks | Lecture | Tutorial | Readings | Assessments Due |
| Week 6 06-04-2020 | Ethics and Standards in Health Science and Health Education practice | Computer Labs Academic research, reading and writing skills expected at university. | Freegard, H. (2012). Ethics in a nutshell. In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp.11-24). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. Freegard, H. (2012). Making ethical decisions. In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp.71-93). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. | – Participation |
| Week 7 13-04-2020 | WHS and Infection Control in the Health Sciences | Infection Control Practices in Health: Hand-washing Room Location TBA | National Health & Medical Research Council. (2010). Australian guidelines for the prevention and control of infection in healthcare. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved December 20, 2016 from | – Annotated Bibliography – Participation |
| Week 8 20-04-2020 | Client centred professional practice in the health sciences | Tutorial Room Manual handling in Health Science Practice | To be updated in vUWS | – Unit Reviews – Participation |
| Week 9 27-04-2020 | INTRA-SESSION BREAK | INTRA-SESSION BREAK | INTRA-SESSION BREAK |
| Weeks | Lecture | Tutorial | Readings | Assessments Due |
| Week 10 04-05-2020 | International Classifcation of Function[ICF]- A theoretical framework for client-centred interprofessional collaboration | Tutorial Room Case studies – Understanding the client’s experience using a client centred approach and the ICF | World Health Organization (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://www.who.int/classifcations/icf/ic Schneidert, M., Hurst, R., Miller, J., & Ustun, B. (2003). The role of environment in the International Classifcation of Function, Disability and Health(ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 25 (11-12), 588-595. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000137090 McIntyre, A. (2009). Documentation and the use of the ICF in interprofessional working. In A. Atwal & M. Jones (Eds.), Preparing for professional practice in health and social care (pp.113-130). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. | fbeginnersguide.pdf?ua=1 – Four Online Competency Quizzes – Participation |
| Week 11 11-05-2020 | Health science teams | Tutorial Room Case Studies – Identifying core and differentiating health professional roles using the ICF | Freegard, H. & Isted, L. (2012). Teamwork. In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp.165-173). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. Atwal, A., & Smith, W. (2009). Interprofessional teamwork. In A. Atwal & M. Jones (Eds.), Preparing for professional practice in health and social care (pp. 1-20). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. | – Participation |
| Week 12 18-05-2020 | Health Science practice and the law | Tutorial Room Understanding the inter-professional team, professional roles and identity | Freegard, H. (2012). What is law? In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp.25-42). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. Russell, M. (2012). Regulation of the professions. In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp. 43-56). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. | – Participation |
29
| Weeks | Lecture | Tutorial | Readings | Assessments Due |
| Week 13 25-05-2020 | Child protection Policies and procedure in Health and Education | Tutorial Room Duty of Care – Risk miminisation – Hazard reduction Safe health science practice: Regulatory obligations to declare and report | FOR HPE Students NSW Department of Education and Training. (2010). Responding to allegations against employees in the area of child protection. Sydney, NSW: Author. Retrieved December 20, 2016, from https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy library/associated documents/respondwoutdisc.pdf For All Other Students NSW Health. (2013). Child wellbeing and child protection policies and procedures for NSW Health. (Publication no. PP2013_007). Retrieved February 24, 2014, from http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/ Online Mandatory Reporter Guide https://reporter.childstory.nsw.gov.au/s/ | pd/2013/pdf/PD2013_007.pdf – Four Online Competency Quizzes – Participation |
| Week 14 01-06-2020 | Professional Self Care and Career Development | Tutorial Room Case Studies related to child protection | Blank, A. (2009). Reflection and professional practice. In A. Atwal & M. Jones (Eds.), Preparing for professional practice in health and social care (pp.41-50). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Cooper, I. (2012). Professional boundaries: Forming relationships and working unsupervised. In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical practice for health professionals (pp. 174-197). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. | – Case Study Assignment – Unit Reviews – Participation |
| Week 15 08-06-2020 | Stuvac | Stuvac | Stuvac | |
| Week 16 15-06-2020 | Exams | Exams | Exams | |
| Week 17 22-06-2020 | Exams | Exams | Exams |
The above timetable should be used as a guide only, as it is subject to change. Students will be advised of any changes as they become known on the unit’s vUWS site.
30
4 Learning Resources
4.1 Recommended Readings
Essential Reading
Atwal, A., & Jones, M. (Eds.). (2009). Preparing for professional practice in health and social care. Chichester,
U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. Available as an ebook via the library webpage.
Freegard, H. C., & Isted, L. (Eds.). (2012). Ethical practice for health professionals (2nd ed.). South Melbourne,
Vic: Cengage Learning Australia.
31
The post 400871 Professional Health Competencies appeared first on My Assignment Online.