Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now
Prices start at $5 per page · plagiarism-free papers · free revisions for 14 days 24/7 support: support@bestwriters.com
Uncategorized

400871 Professional Health Competencies

  • Posted
  • Authoradmin
  • Length8,870 words
  • Reading time39 min
Write My Assignment FREE

School of Health Sciences
400871 Professional Health Competencies
Autumn 2020
Edition: Autumn 2020
Copyright ©2020 University Western Sydney trading as Western Sydney University ABN 53 014 069 881 CRICOS Provider No: 00917K No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission from the Dean of the School. Copyright for acknowledged materials reproduced
herein is retained by the copyright holder. All readings in this publication are copied under licence in accordance with Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968.
Unit Details

Unit Code:400871
Unit Name:Professional Health Competencies
Credit Points:10
Unit Level:1
Assumed Knowledge:Not Applicable

Note: Students with any problems, concerns or doubts should discuss those with the Unit Coordinator as early as they can.
Unit Coordinator
Name: Ms Liz Atteya
Email: e.atteya@westernsydney.edu.au
Consultation Arrangement:
Please email Liz for a consultation appointment.
Your tutor is your frst point of contact for questions with respect to the learning material.
Name: Dr Cathy Tannous
Email: c.tannous@westernsydney.edu.au
Consultation Arrangement:
Your tutor is your frst point of contact for questions with respect to the learning material.
Teaching Team
Name: Ms Sarah Cavallin
Email: s.cavallin@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Sarah Chuah
Email: s.chuah@westernsydney,edu.au
Name: Dr Inez Farag
Email: i.farag@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Marcus Drivas
Email: m.drivas@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Louise Breheny
Email: l.breheny@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Amanda Low
Email: a.low@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Johanna Korkalainen
Email: j.korkalainen@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Buck Reed
Email: b.reed@westernsydney.edu,au
Name: Ms Joanne Rodrigues
Email: j.rodrigues@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Ehab Ghobreyal
Email: g.ghobreyal@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Nariman Dennaoui
Email: n.dennaoui@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Mr Tomas Megalaa
Email: t.megalaa@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Elise Desira
Email: e.desira@westernsydney.edu.au
Name: Ms Narelle Rowe
Email: n.rowe@westernsydney.edu.au

Note: The relevant Learning Guide Companion supplements this document
Contents
1 About Professional Health Competencies 2
1.1 An Introduction to this Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 What is Expected of You . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Changes to Unit as a Result of Past Student Feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 Assessment Information 4
2.1 Unit Learning Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Approach to Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3 Contribution to Course Learning Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4 Assessment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.5 Assessment Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.5.1 Four Online Competency Quizzes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.5.2 Annotated Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5.3 Case Study Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.5.4 Unit Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.5.5 Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.6 General Submission Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3 Teaching and Learning Activities 27
4 Learning Resources 31
4.1 Recommended Readings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1
1 About Professional Health Competencies
1.1 An Introduction to this Unit
This unit introduces skills for studying and working in health science. Students will gain an understanding of the
interdisciplinary and multi-disciplinary nature of health science practice in the 21st century, and how this interacts
with the specialty health professions, client and community expectations of health care and employment opportunities
in health science. Students will learn foundation competencies that will underpin their academic development and
their safe, responsible and ethical practice in health science service environments.
1.2 What is Expected of You
Study Load
A student is expected to study an hour per credit point a week. For example a 10 credit point unit would require 10
hours of study per week. This time includes the time spent within classes during lectures, tutorials or practicals.
Attendance
There is some overlap in the learning outcomes achieved by each assessment item. As such the following assessment
items are not mandatory ( ie Annotated Bibliography, case study assignment or unit reviews). The exception to this
is the 4 online competency-based quizzes which are threshold mandatory assessment tasks.
Online Learning Requirements
Unit materials will be made available on the unit’s vUWS (E-Learning) site (https://vuws.westernsydney.edu.au/).
You are expected to consult vUWS at least twice a week, as all unit announcements will be made via vUWS. Teaching
and learning materials will be regularly updated and posted online by the teaching team.
Special Requirements
Essential Equipment:
Not Applicable
Legislative Pre-Requisites:
Not Applicable
Policies Related to Teaching and Learning
The University has a number of policies that relate to teaching and learning. Important policies affecting students
include:
– Assessment Policy
– Bullying Prevention Policy and
– Guidelines
– Enrolment Policy
– Examinations Policy
– Review of Grade Policy
– Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy
– Special Consideration Policy
– Student Misconduct Rule
– Teaching and Learning – Fundamental Code
– Student Code of Conduct
2
Academic Integrity and Student Misconduct Rule
In submitting assessments, it is essential that you are familiar with the policies listed above and that you understand
the principles of academic integrity. You are expected to act honestly and ethically in the production of all academic
work and assessment tasks, submit work that is your own and acknowledge any contribution to your work made by
others.
Important information about academic integrity, including advice to students is available at https://www.westernsydney.
edu.au/studysmart/home/academic_integrity_and_plagiarism. It is your responsibility to familiarise yourself with
these principles and apply them to all work submitted to the University as your own.
When you submit an assignment or product, you will declare that no part has been: copied from any other student’s work or from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment; submitted by
you in another (previous or current) assessment, except where appropriately referenced, and with prior permission
from the Unit Coordinator; written/produced for you by any other person except where collaboration has been authorised by the Unit Coordinator.
The Student Misconduct Rule applies to all students of Western Sydney University and makes it an offence for
any student to engage in academic, research or general misconduct as defned in the Rule.
The University considers plagiarism, cheating and collusion as instances of academic misconduct. The University
also considers submitting falsifed documentation in support of applications for special consideration, including sitting
of deferred examinations, as instances of general misconduct. You should be aware that changes were made to the
Student Misconduct Rule commencing 1 January 2020 that provide for minimum sanctions that apply to certain
conduct, including the provision of falsifed documentation to the University.
You are strongly advised to read the Student Misconduct Rule and the Inappropriate Behaviour Guidelines at the
commencement of each session to familiarise yourself with this process and the expectations of the University in
relation to work submitted for assessment.
1.3 Changes to Unit as a Result of Past Student Feedback
The University values student feedback in order to improve the quality of its educational programs. The feedback
provided helps us improve teaching methods and units of study. The survey results inform unit content and design,
learning guides, teaching methods, assessment processes and teaching materials.
You are welcome to provide feedback that is related to the teaching of this unit. At the end of the semester you will
be given the opportunity to complete a Student Feedback on Unit (SFU) questionnaire to assess the unit. You may
also have the opportunity to complete a Student Feedback on Teaching (SFT) questionnaire to provide feedback for
individual teaching staff.
As a result of student feedback, the following changes and improvements to this unit have recently been made:
– Initiation of computer based classes in weeks 1-6 to assist with computer and information literacy skill development
– Move from fortnightly to weekly classes
– Development of additional literacy support documentation to assist students’ completion of written assessments
– Consolidation of multiple weekly quizzes into 2 unit reviews
– Movement of unit content so that it scaffolds and prepares students for content in their own professional units
in Autumn session
– Development of additional case studies that help develop students understanding of professional roles and
obligations
– Unit Reviews changed to 45 minutes duration
– Work Health & Safety Quiz pass mark altered to 80%
3
2 Assessment Information
2.1 Unit Learning Outcomes
Becoming a health science professional requires an understanding of your obligations in response to the expectations
set by the general public and your professional group. This unit aims to introduce you to these responsibilities and
expectation of all health science practitioners and the core competencies expected in health science practice. Upon
successfully completing this unit, you should be able to:

Outcome
1Recognise, describe and practise skills for ensuring academic success in a health science degree
2Practise information literacy skills appropriate for the academic environment
3Describe and apply principles to ensure ethical practice in the current academic and future health science
environment
4Use health related terms and International Classifcation of Functioning (ICF) concepts to demonstrate a
holistic understanding of health within the framework of person centred practice
5Describe and apply principles of safe practice in the health sciences
6Describe and apply the legal responsibilities and obligations of health science professionals
7Explain and describe approaches used in inter-professional health science teams

2.2 Approach to Learning
Attendance It is strongly recommended that you attend all scheduled learning activities to support your learning.
Students with a poor attendance record may fnd themselves at risk of not passing assessment tasks. Unit materials
will be made available on the unit’s vUWS (E-Learning) site. You are expected to consult vUWS at least twice a
week, as all unit announcements will be made via vUWS. Teaching and learning materials will be regularly updated
and posted online. Online Learning Requirements Lecture notes and laboratory worksheets will be made available
on the E-Learning (Blackboard) link on The University home page http://www.westernsydney.edu.au/ Students are
expected to consult the unit Blackboard site at least twice a week, as all announcements will be made via this site
and teaching material will be regularly updated and posted online.
4
2.3 Contribution to Course Learning Outcomes
Western Sydney University Graduate Attributes
Graduate Attributes ULO 1 ULO 2 ULO 3 ULO 4 ULO 5 ULO 6 ULO 7

1. Command multiple skills and literacies to enable adaptable
lifelong learning
IntroducedDevelopedIntroducedIntroducedIntroduced
2. Demonstrate knowledge of Indigenous Australia through
cultural competency and professional capacity
IntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroduced
3. Demonstrate comprehensive, coherent and connected
knowledge
IntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroduced
4. Apply knowledge through intellectual inquiry in professional
or applied contexts
IntroducedIntroduced
5. Bring knowledge to life through responsible engagement and
appreciation of diversity in an evolving world
IntroducedIntroducedIntroduced

5
4656: Bachelor of Health Science
Course Learning Outcomes ULO 1 ULO 2 ULO 3 ULO 4 ULO 5 ULO 6 ULO 7

1. Applies in-depth knowledge of the chosen discipline to local
and international contexts and the broader health environment.
IntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroduced
2. Implement the values and principles of scholarly inquiry and
evidence-based practice as they relate to investigating and
enhancing health outcomes.
IntroducedDevelopedIntroduced
3. Applies effective oral and written communication skills and
utilises and other technologies effectively in client interactions,
health service delivery and personal and professional learning.
Introduced
4. Evaluates qualitative and quantitative data to interpret and
solve health related problems and apply treatments and/or
management solutions.
IntroducedDevelopedIntroduced
5. Practices autonomous and effective learning and relates
appropriately to clients and other stakeholders within the health
and community context.
IntroducedIntroduced
6. Respects the culture, experiences and achievements of
Indigenous Australians and communicates ethically and
effectively within Indigenous Australian contexts.
IntroducedIntroduced
7. Integrates theoretical and practical knowledge with applied
critical, reflective, and creative skills to make informed decisions
in professional contexts.
Introduced
8. Engages effectively in advancing knowledge and promoting
health both independently and collaboratively.
IntroducedIntroducedIntroduced
9. Models and promotes ethical conduct, intellectual integrity,
cultural diversity and social justice principles and professionalism
in health contexts.
IntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroducedIntroduced
10. Initiates and contributes positively to sustainable change and
improvements in health in a diverse and evolving world.
IntroducedIntroduced

6
2.4 Assessment Summary
The assessment items in this unit are designed to enable you to demonstrate that you have achieved the unit
learning outcomes. Completion and submission of all assessment items which have been designated as mandatory or
compulsory is essential to receive a passing grade.
To pass this unit you must:
– Achieve a PASS in the four competency-based quizzes A, B, C and D – Achieve an overall mark of 50 There are
5 assessment items in this unit, designed to enable you to demonstrate that you have achieved the unit learning
outcomes.

ItemWeightDue DateULOs AssessedThreshold
Four Online Competency
Quizzes
S/UQuiz A: Week 3 Friday 20th March at
5pm, Quiz B: Bring printed WH&S
certifcate to your tutorial class in Week
5, Quiz C: Week 10 Friday 8th May at
5pm, Quiz D: Week 13, Friday 29th May
at 5pm
1-5Yes
Annotated Bibliography30%Week 7 Friday 17th April at 5pm1-3No
Case Study Assignment40%Week 14 Friday 5th June at 5pm1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7No
Unit Reviews20%Review 1: Week 8, Friday 24th April at
5pm; Review 2: Week 14, Friday 5th
June at 5pm
1-7No
Participation10%In tutorials in Weeks 3-8, 10-141-7No

Feedback on Assessment
Feedback is an important part of the learning process that can improve your progress towards achieving the learning
outcomes. Feedback is any written or spoken response made in relation to academic work such as an assessment
task, a performance or product. It can be given to you by a teacher, an external assessor or student peer, and may
be given individually or to a group of students. As a Western Sydney University student, it is your responsibility to
seek out and act on feedback that is provided to you as a resource to further your learning.
7
2.5 Assessment Details
2.5.1 Four Online Competency Quizzes

Weight:S/U
Type of Collaboration:Individual
Due:Quiz A: Week 3 Friday 20th March at 5pm, Quiz B: Bring printed WH&S certifcate to
your tutorial class in Week 5, Quiz C: Week 10 Friday 8th May at 5pm, Quiz D: Week
13, Friday 29th May at 5pm
Submission:Modules and quiz are available on vUWS
Format:Four Online Competency Quizzes. Complete and submit these via vUWS.
Length:MCQs, Untimed, repeated attempts allowed, 20 questions
Curriculum Mode:Quiz
Threshold Detail:These are compulsory pass/fail quizzes; you must achieve a pass mark of 18/20 or 80%
depending on the quiz you are attempting in order to pass the quiz, and pass the unit.
You can repeat the quiz as many times as you wish until you achieve the pass mark.

These are compulsory pass/fail quizzes; you must achieve a pass mark of 18/20 or 80% depending on the quiz you
are attempting in order to pass the quiz, and pass the unit. You can repeat the quiz as many times as you wish until
you achieve the pass mark.
These quizzes are all on-line. You will have learned how to use the ’quiz’ function in vUWS during your tutorial class.
You should complete the quizzes independently so that you can be confdent you understand the material and can
accurately apply the correct procedure to a given scenario.
On-line Quiz A: Successful Searching Quiz
Due Date: Wk 3 Friday 20th March at 5pm
Length: Six modules and one quiz
Submission Details: Modules and quiz are available in the vUWS site
Feedback details: The quiz score is available immediately after the quiz has been submitted. Students are required
to obtain a mark of at least 18 out of 20 in order to pass this quiz. The quiz may be reattempted multiple times
until the pass mark of 18/20 is achieved.
Rationale
Being a university student involves fnding, interpreting and evaluating information to use in the assessments. It
also involves managing and referencing citations accurately using a standard formatting style, such as the American
Psychological Association (APA).
The ’successful searching’ library tutorial is made up of six (6) modules that aim to develop these skills and thereby,
8
help you to secure success as a university student. These modules include:
– Getting started (in fnding relevant information)
– Interpreting a reading list
– Finding more information
– Evaluating information
– Managing citations
– Plagiarism
Task
– Go to vUWS site of the unit.
– In vUWS, click on the folder called ’Assessments” then “ Assessment 1 – Quizzes” then “ Successful Searching
Quiz” .
– Complete each of the six (6) modules. Then complete the quiz on vUWS. If you fail the quiz you should repeat
the module and re-do the quiz until a PASS grade is achieved (a mark of at least 18/20). You can repeat the
quiz as many times as needed to achieve a PASS.
– Once you have passed the quiz, your PASS grade will be automatically registered on vUWS.
On-line Quiz B. Western Sydney Work Health and Safety (WHS) Quiz
Due Date: Bring printed WH&S certifcate to your tutorial class in Week 5
Length: Five modules and fve mini quizzes.
Submission Details: Modules and quizzes are available in the vUWS site called ’School of Science and Health WHS
Induction 2018’. You will have access to this site from the beginning of session. Once in the site click on the tab
called ’Health Science’.
This folder contains 5 separate modules and quizzes related to work health and safety at Western Sydney University.
You will need to review each module and then complete the short quiz that follows.
That means that in total you will need to complete 5 short module-specifc quizzes. A mark of 80% is required to
pass each quiz. When you achieve 80% for Module/Quiz 1, Module /Quiz 2 will open. When you complete 80% for
Module/Quiz 2, Module/Quiz 3 will open and so on. This is how you will work through each of the fve modules and
quizzes. As these are competency-based quizzes a pass mark of 80% will be required for each of them.
If not achieved on the frst attempt, please re-attempt the quiz until you achieve this score.
When you achieve 80% at the end of Module/Quiz 5 a certifcate will be produced. Please bring this certifcate to
your tutorial class in Week 5.
Rationale
Being part of the Western Sydney University, students are required to be aware of Work Health and Safety requirements. Furthermore, as such requirements are essential in any health care or educational setting, knowledge of WHS
requirements will prepare students for their future roles as health professionals. The WHS on-line modules aim to
develop students’ knowledge regarding health and safety in the workplace and university environment.
Task
9
– Go to vUWS site called ’School of Science and Health WHS Induction 2018’. Once in the site click on the tab
called ’Health Science’.
– Review each module and then complete the short quiz that follows. When you achieve 80% for Module/Quiz
1, Module /Quiz 2 will open. When you complete 80% for Module/Quiz 2, Module/Quiz 3 will open and so
on. This is how you will work through each of the fve modules and quizzes.
– When you achieve 80% in the fnal quiz a certifcate will be produced. Bring this certifcate to your tutorial in
Week 5.
On-line Quiz C: Infection Control in Health Practice
Due Date: Wk. 10 Friday 8th May at 5pm
Length: Review Australian Infection Control guidelines and complete one quiz
Submission Details: Guidelines and quiz are available in the vUWS site
Feedback details: The quiz score is available immediately after the quiz has been submitted. Students are required
to obtain a mark of at least 18 out of 20 in order to pass this quiz. The quiz may be reattempted multiple times
until the pass mark of 18/20 is achieved.
Rationale
As a health science student and practitioner, students are required to be aware of (a) the risks, rights and responsibilities relating to the role; (b) guidelines, regulations and the law as mechanisms to provide a framework for safe
practice; and (c) principles of infection control: your obligations on placement.
This quiz ensures you have gained awareness in these aspects, hence, achieved Learning Outcome 5 and 6 of the unit.
Task
– Go to the vUWS site of the unit.
– In vUWS, click on the folder called ’Assessment for this Unit” then “ Assessment 1 – Quizzes” then ’Infection
Control in Health Practice’.
– View the on-line resources on infection control procedures and then complete the quiz. If you fail the quiz you
should view the resources and re-do the quiz until a PASS grade is achieved (a mark of at least 18/20). You
can repeat the quiz as many times as needed to achieve a PASS.
– Once you have achieved a PASS, your grade will be automatically registered on vUWS.
On-line Quiz D: Child Protection Policy and Procedure
Due Date: Wk. 13 Friday 29th May at 5pm
Length: Review national child protection guidelines and complete one quiz
Submission Details: Guidelines and quiz are available in the vUWS site
10
Feedback details: The quiz score is available immediately after the quiz has been submitted. Students are required
to obtain a mark of at least 18 out of 20 in order to pass this quiz. The quiz may be reattempted multiple times
until the pass mark of 18/20 is achieved.
Rationale
As a health science student and practitioner, students are required to be aware of (a) the risks, rights and responsibilities relating to the role; (b) guidelines, regulations and the law as mechanisms to provide a framework for safe
practice; and (c) principles of Child Protection: your responsibilities.
This quiz ensures you have gained awareness in these aspects, hence, achieved Learning Outcome 6 of the unit.
Task
– Go to the vUWS site of the unit.
– In vUWS, click on the folder called ’Assessment for this Unit” then “Assessment 1 – Quizzes” then “Child
Protection Policy and Procedure” .
– Read the set of documents to do with Child protection policy and procedure in Australia and then complete the
quiz related to the readings. If you fail the quiz you should view the resources and re-do the quiz until a PASS
grade is achieved (a mark of at least 18/20). You can repeat the quiz as many times as needed to achieve a
PASS.
– Once you have achieved a PASS, your grade will be automatically registered on vUWS
Resources:
These quizzes are all on-line. You will have learned how to use the ’quiz’ function in vUWS during your tutorial class.
You should complete the quizzes independently so that you can be confdent you understand the material and can
accurately apply the correct procedure to a given scenario.
11
Marking Criteria:
These quizzes are marked on the basis of pass/fail. You must achieve a pass mark of 18/20 or 80% depending on
the quiz you are attempting in order to pass the quiz, and pass the unit. You can repeat the quiz as many times as
needed to achieve the pass mark.
12
2.5.2 Annotated Bibliography

Weight:30%
Type of Collaboration:Individual
Due:Week 7 Friday 17th April at 5pm
Submission:Through the Turnitin link for your tutor in the 400871 vUWS site
Format:Recommended structure for the annotated bibliography
Title for the annotated bibliography: state the health condition you have selected for
this bibliography
PART 1: Search Strategy: provide answers to specifc sections of the template relating
to what search strategies you used to fnd your 4 publications
PART 2: Annotations
Citation for publication 1: provide the reference for this publication, using APA
referencing style
Summary of publication 1: state the type of publication, its source, articulate the
purpose of the publication, and summarise the author(s)’ main points/arguments as
presented in the publication, the evidence the author(s) used in supporting the main
points and their conclusions on the health condition.
Evaluation of publication 1: evaluate the publication, using each of these criteria:
authority (author and/or source), currency, justifcation of main points and conclusions,
the alignment of main points and conclusions with intended purpose and contributions
of the publication to understanding of the health condition (clinical presentation,
development of the condition and/or treatment methods)
Citation for publication 2: …
Summary of publication 2: …
Evaluation of publication 2: …
Citation for publication 3: …
Summary of publication 3: …
Evaluation of publication 3: …
Citation for publication 4: …
Summary of publication 4 …
Evaluation of publication 4 …
Reference list: include a reference list for all the publications you have used in the
bibliography, using APA referencing style.
Please note that the word limit for the Annotated Bibliography is 1000 words. Over 10%
outside the word limit will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the
assignment. Citations for the four publications and the reference list at the end of the
Annotated Bibliography are not counted towards the word limit.
Please see the assessment resource on how to write up an annotated bibliography
located on vUWS for more detailed instructions and guidance.
Length:1,000 words
Curriculum Mode:Annotated Bibliography

Length: 1000 words (This word limit does not include the bibliographic reference above each annotation and the
reference list. Ten percent above or below this amount is allowable without penalty. Over 10% outside the word limit
will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment)..
13
Feedback details: Online feedback will be made available in week 11 and a discussion of the overall class strengths
and weaknesses will occur in week 11. Students are encouraged to read through and consider their feedback when
preparing future assignments.
Rationale
This assessment item enables you to:
– demonstrate profciency in using the standard functions of vUWS
– demonstrate profciency in accessing learning resources on vUWS and in the library
– demonstrate competent use of text-matching software, such as Turnitin, to enhance academic integrity
– accurately identify and use common medical, health and health policy terminologies
– use library searching strategies to locate publications relating to a health topic
– critically interpret and evaluate health information
– use referencing and citation conventions in the health sciences
These aspects are closely related to the Unit Learning Outcomes 1, 2 and 3.
Task
You will be expected to go through 4 steps in accomplishing this assessment item, as follows.
Step 1: Choose one of the following clinical conditions:
– Osteoarthritis (OA)
– Dementia
– Attention defcit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
– Epilepsy
– Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
– Asthma
– Drug addiction
– Schizophrenia
– Chronic Renal Failure
– Hypercholesterolemia
– Sciatica
– Depression
– Down syndrome (DS)
– Anxiety disorder
– Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI)
– Alcoholism
– Obsessive compulsive disorder
– Angina or Congestive Cardiac Failure
– Anorexia Nervosa
– Autism or Asperger’s Spectrum Disorder
Each condition has been selected because it has a high community prevalence or high community impact. As a health
science professional you are therefore likely to come across students, clients or community members who have one
of these conditions at some time in your student or graduate career. Choose the one that most interests you and/or
is most relevant to your future professional role. In Assessment 3 – Case study, you will be required to describe
an intervention you may use as a health professional in your feld for someone with this condition. This annotated
bibliography will help develop your understanding of this condition in preparation for the case study assignment.
Step 2: Using the library searching skills you have developed through this unit, fnd the following 4 publications that
will provide information to help you better understand this condition:
14
– 1 academic journal article
– 1 government publication
– 1 professional book or book chapter
– 1 podcast (from a reputable source such as ABC Radio or the World Health Organisation)
Ensure that you search for information from scholarly or reputable sources.
Step 3: Prepare an annotated bibliography on the clinical condition using the 4 publications. This assignment should
be completed in the template provided in the vUWS site. The annotated bibliography template is in a word document
format. You can type your assignment directly into the template. As you begin the assignment make sure you ’save
as’ onto your own computer or usb with a different fle name containing the assignment title, your name and your
student number eg. “Annotated Bibliography Nicole Kidman 12345432” . Please use the template to ensure
you complete all required sections of the annotated bibliography assignment. The template contains the following
structure for writing up the annotated bibliography assignment.
Please note that the word limit for the Annotated Bibliography is 1000 words. Over 10% outside the word
limit will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment. Citations for the four
publications and the reference list at the end of the Annotated Bibliography are not counted towards the
word limit.
Please see the assessment resource on how to write up an annotated bibliography located on vUWS for more detailed
instructions and guidance.
Step 4: Submit your assignment online through Turnitin. Make sure that the title of your assignment contains your
name and student number. For example: ”NicoleKidman98765432AnnotatedBibliography”. An assignment coversheet is not required for online assignment submission.
15
Marking Criteria:

CriteriaUnsatisfactoryExpected
performance
High PerformanceExcellent
performance
Outstanding
performance
Summary of each
publication covering:
– text type
– purpose
– main points
and/or arguments
– evidence
– conclusions
Summary misses most
required elements
Over-reliance on the
original, such as
excessive use of direct
quotes and/or
paraphrasing
repeating more than
25% of the original.
Attempts to
summarise most
elements of each
publication, though
the summary may
contain irrelevant
information or miss
some key details
relating to the
elements.
Attempt to use own
words, with some use
of direct quotes;
paraphrasing contains
less than 25% of the
original.
Summary covers all
required elements;
though summary can
be lengthy and/or
miss some key
information.
Uses own words, with
minimal use of direct
quotes; paraphrasing
mostly independent
from the original.
A clear summary
covers all elements,
prioritising key
information and
omitting most details
not integral to the
elements.
Summary is generally
independent from the
original, with some
useful interpretation
of the author’s main
points and
conclusions on the
health condition.
A clear and concise
summary covers all
elements, prioritising
key information and
omitting all details
not integral to the
elements.
Summary is
completely
independent from the
original, with
insightful
interpretation of the
author’s main points
and conclusions on
the health condition.
6 marks1-23-3.54-4.254.5-56
Evaluation of each
publication based on:
– authority
– currency
– justifcation of
main points and
conclusions
– main points and
conclusions aligned
with intended
purpose
– contributions
Limited evaluation
that misses most
criteria and/or
contains invalid
information for most
criteria.
Basic evaluation
draws on all criteria,
however, comments
on some criteria can
be simplistic.
Comments relate to
individual
publications only.
Detailed evaluation
draws on all criteria,
with some thoughtful
comments on the
justifcation of
information,
alignment with
intended purpose and
contributions of the
publication to
understanding of the
health condition.
Comments relate to
individual
publications only.
Clear and detailed
evaluation draws on
all criteria, with
thoughtful comments
on the justifcation of
information,
alignment with
intended purpose and
contributions of the
publication to
understanding of the
health condition.
Comments make
some link across the
4 publications.
In-depth evaluation
draws on all criteria,
with insightful
comments on the
accuracy of
information and
contributions of the
publication to
understanding of the
health condition.
Comments make clear
link and comparisons
across the 4
publications.
6 marks1-23-3.54-4.254.5-56
Completion of the
search strategies
template
No or very little
completion of the
search strategy
section of template
AND/OR the
template is completed
with invalid
information
The template is
mostly completed
that:
Identifes some search
terms relevant to the
assignment;
Uses one Boolean
operators correct to
group terms;
Identifes one relevant
source for each
publication;
Identifes some
relevant limiters;
Identifes some
criteria for selecting
suitable publications
All sections in the
template are
completed that:
Identifes some search
terms highly relevant
to the assignment;
Uses both Boolean
operators correctly to
group terms;
Identifes relevant
sources for the
publications, some
publications with
more than one
source;
Identifes some highly
relevant limiters;
Identifes some key
criteria for selecting
suitable publications.
All sections in the
template are clearly
completed that:
Identifes a range of
search terms highly
relevant to the
assignment;
Uses Boolean
operators and
truncation correctly
to group terms;
Identifes more than
one highly relevant
sources for each
publication;
Identifes a range of
highly relevant
limiters;
Identifes a range of
key criteria for
selecting suitable
publications.
All sections in the
template are clearly
and concisely
completed that:
Identifes a range of
search terms
pertinent to the
assignment;
Uses Boolean
operators and
truncation correctly
and effciently to
group terms;
Identifes a range of
highly relevant
sources for each
publication;
Identifes a range of
highly relevant and
effcient limiters;
Identifes a range of
well-developed
criteria for selecting
suitable publications.
6 marks1-23-3.54-4.254.5-56
Academic writing
skills:
Bibliography is
disorganised;
annotation
paragraphs have no
clear point and/or
structure.
Non-conventional
spelling, punctuation
and grammar
interfere with
meaning.
Limited use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions.
Attempts to structure
the bibliography,
however, information
in paragraphs may
vary from the topic
sentence.
Frequent errors in
spelling, punctuation
and grammar but
they do not interfere
with meaning.
Attempts to use
academic vocabulary
and expressions,
though with
occasional errors.
Bibliography is mostly
well constructed;
paragraphs may
include some
information varying
from the topic
sentence.
Occasional errors in
spelling,
punctuations, and
grammar.
Suffcient use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions, may
be with some errors.
Bibliography is
generally well
constructed with
clear paragraphs.
Conventional spelling,
grammar and
punctuation, with
some minor errors.
Competent use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions,
maybe with some
minor errors only.
Bibliography is
consistently well
constructed with
clear and concise
paragraphs.
Conventional spelling,
grammar and
punctuation, maybe
with some typos only.
Advanced use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions.
6 marks1-23-3.54-4.254.5-56

16

CriteriaUnsatisfactoryExpected
performance
High PerformanceExcellent
performance
Outstanding
performance
Reference formattingReferences not
according to APA
style, with frequent
errors.
APA style used incon
sistently,
with some
major errors
including
some key
information
(Au
thor/year/title
no./pages)
missing from
the citation;
the incorrect
order of
information
in the
citation, or
reference list
not in
alphabetical
order or not
containing
hanging
indents.
/vol
Referencing mostly
follows APA style,
with some minor
errors only.
Minor errors includes
the misplacement or
omission of full
stops, commas,
capitalisation, italics,
or brackets.
Referencing generally
follows APA style,
with minimal minor
errors only.
Referencing
consistently follows
APA style, with no
errors.
6 marks1-23-3.54-4.254.5-56
Tentative Markout of 30

DEDUCTIONS

Word limitIs above the word limit by more
than 100 words (10%)
(word count does not including
references/reference list)
Deduct 2 marks
Late Turnitin SubmissionDeduct 10% of the assignment’s
worth for each day the assignment
is late (incl. Sat/Sun) (ref: UWS
Assessment Policy)
Deduct 3 marks per each day

FINAL MARK out of 30
17
2.5.3 Case Study Assignment

Weight:40%
Type of Collaboration:Individual
Due:Week 14 Friday 5th June at 5pm
Submission:Through the Turnitin link in the 400871 vUWS site. An assignment coversheet is not
required for online assignment submission
Format:Recommended structure for the case study
Section 1: Description of the case (200 words)
In this section, you will be expected to describe a person’s condition and how the
condition, when combined with contextual factors, impacts on his/her level of
functioning in terms of impairments, daily activity limitations and social participation
restrictions. You will be expected to use ICF components in your description.
Section 2: Description and justifcation of your intervention∗ (450words)
In this section, you will be required to:
a. defne your role as a health professional (either in direct client service delivery or as
an administrator of a heath service organisation or public health professional)
b. identify and describe an intervention∗ you may offer in the role you have defned to
promote this person’s level of functioning (either in direct service delivery to the client
or in administration or public health. Use scholarly ∗∗ publications/references to support
your choice of intervention.
c. identify what components of the ICF your intervention may target.
d. identify any risks involved with the intervention and describe two strategies that will
help to minimise these risks.
∗ An intervention refers to something you do as a health professional to assist the
person (client/patient) or population group. It can include a treatment, activity, project,
initiative, program or a service.
∗∗ Scholarly publications refer to academic references (books/journal articles) that are
trustworthy and credible. With regard to websites, only publications from .gov or .edu
are permitted.
Section 3: Identifcation of another health professional in the team and description of
his/her role (300 words)
In this section, you will be required to:
a. identify and describe the role of another health professional who is also working with
this person/population group as part of the inter-professional team.
b. specify what components of the ICF this role may target.
Use scholarly publications to support this section.
Section 4: Specifcation of professionalism characteristics (300 words)
Choose 3 characteristics of professionalism and describe how you will demonstrate these
when conducting your intervention as described in Section 2. Use scholarly publications
to support your description of professional characteristics.
Section 5: Description and justifcation of person-centred/ population-centred strategies
(250 words)
Describe 2 strategies you will implement to ensure that your practice is
person-centred/population-centred. Use scholarly publications to support your strategies.
Length:1,500 words
Curriculum Mode:Case Study

18
Due Date: Week 14 Friday 5th June at 5pm
Length: 1500 words (excluding reference list). Ten percent above this amount is allowable without penalty. Over
10% outside the word limit will attract a deduction of 2 marks from your fnal mark of the assignment.
Submission Details: Through the Turnitin link in the 400871 vUWS site. An assignment coversheet is not required
for online assignment submission
Feedback details: Online feedback will be made available after results are released for the unit. Students are
encouraged to read through and consider their feedback when preparing future assignments.
Rationale
This assessment item requires you to:
– access learning resources on vUWS and via the library website and appropriately reference these learning
resources
– use common medical, health and health policy terminology accurately
– identify and describe a clinical condition relating to a person accurately using ICF components correctly
– describe the roles and activities of relevant members of an inter-professional team, using ICF components.
– identify and describe the risks associated in health science practice and specify strategies to minimise the risks
– identify and describe characteristic features of professionalism in the day to day activities of health science
practice
– describe and apply a client-centred practice approach to health science practice
These aspects are closely related to the Unit Learning Outcomes 1 to 7.
Task
This case study assignment will require you to apply aspects of professional health science practice to a case study
created by you. You will be required to select one of the clinical conditions listed for the annotated bibliography and
write up a case study of a person with that clinical condition. You may choose the same condition that you used for
the annotated bibliography; however this is not a requirement. You are strongly recommended to use the following
structure in writing up your case study.
19
Marking Criteria:

CriteriaUnsatisfactoryExpected
performance
High PerformanceExcellent
performance
Outstanding
performance
Description of the
case
Limited description
that fails to provide
an accurate account
of the case regarding
condition, relevant
contextual factors
and their impact on
the person’s
functioning.
Limited use of ICF
components.
Attempts to describe
the person’s
condition, relevant
contextual factors
and their impact on
his/her functioning,
though the
description is
superfcial at times.
Attempts to use ICF
components, with
some inaccuracies
and/or
inconsistencies.
Detailed and accurate
description of the
condition, relevant
contextual factors
and their impact on
the person’s
functioning, though
may lack in clarity at
times.
Competent use of
ICF components,
with some minor
inconsistencies only.
Clear, concise and
accurate description
of the condition, all
relevant contextual
factors and
thoughtful impact on
the person’s
functioning.
Advanced use of ICF
components, with no
errors.
Comprehensive and
accurate description
of the condition;
thoughtful
identifcation of
relevant contextual
factors and insightful
discussion of their
impact on the
person’s functioning.
Effective use of ICF
components that
highlights key aspects
of the case.
5 marks0-22.5-33.545
Description and
justifcation of your
intervention
No or limited
defnition of the role.
Limited description
and justifcation of
the intervention; or
the intervention is
invalid.
Limited reference to
the ICF components.
Limited discussion of
potential risks and
minimisation
strategies, or the
discussion is invalid.
Basic defnition of the
role, with some
incorrect information
about the role.
Attempts to describe
a basic intervention
relevant to the role,
though the
justifcation is
simplistic.
Suffcient reference to
ICF components.
Attempts to identify
some relevant risks
and 2 minimisations
strategies; though the
strategies are basic.
Uses at least 3
scholarly references.
Detailed defnition of
the role, though some
information might be
incorrect.
Detailed description
of a working
intervention relevant
to the role, with a
detailed justifcation.
Frequent and
accurate reference to
ICF components.
Most relevant risks
are identifed, with 2
thoughtful
minimisations
strategies.
Uses at least 4
scholarly references.
Clear, concise and
accurate description
of the role.
Clear and concise
description of a well
developed
intervention for the
role, with thoughtful
justifcation.
Accurate and
consistent reference
to ICF components.
Accurately identifes
all risks, with 2
well-developed
minimisation
strategies.
Uses a range of
scholarly references.
Succinct and accurate
description of the role
Comprehensive
description of an
insightful and well
developed
intervention for the
role, with insightful
justifcation.
Consistent, clear and
accurate links to the
ICF components.
Accurately identifes
risks that are
pertinent to the
intervention, with 2
insightful
minimisation
strategies.
Uses a wide range of
scholarly references.
12 marks0-5.56-789-1011-12
Identifcation of
another health
professional and
description of
his/her role
No attempt to
identify another
health professional, or
the professional is
remotely relevant in
the team.
Limited description of
the role, with no link
to ICF components.
Identifes another
professional, though
his/her role is not
directly relevant to
the team or your role.
Basic description of
his/her role with
some reference to ICF
components.
Uses some scholarly
references.
Correctly identifes
another professional
relevant to the team
and/or your role.
Detailed description
of his/her role, with
frequent reference to
ICF components.
Uses suffcient
scholarly references.
Correctly identifes
another professional
who is highly relevant
to the team and your
role.
Clear and concise
description of his/her
role, with accurate
and consistent
reference to ICF
components.
Uses a range of
scholarly references.
Correctly identifes
another professional
who is signifcant to
the team and your
role.
Comprehensive
description of his/her
role, with consistent,
clear and accurate
links to ICF
components.
Uses a wide range of
scholarly references.
7 marks0-33.5-455.56-7
Specifcation of
professionalism
characteristics
Specifes less than
three characteristics,
or the plan for
implementing these is
limitedly integrated
with the intervention.
Specifes three
relevant
characteristics, with a
basic plan for
implementing them in
practice.
Use some scholarly
references
Specifes three
characteristics that
are highly relevant to
the intervention and
profession, with a
detailed plan for their
implementation in
practice.
Uses suffcient
scholarly references
Specifes three
characteristics that
are pertinent to the
intervention and
profession, with a
thoughtful plan for
their implementation
in practice.
Uses a range of
scholarly references
Specifes three
characteristics that
are signifcant to the
intervention and
profession, with
insightful initiatives
for ensuring them in
practice.
Uses a wide range of
scholarly references.
8 marks0-34-55.567-8
Description and
justifcation of
person-centred
strategies
Identifes less than 2
strategies to promote
person-centred
practice, with limited
justifcation; or the
strategies are invalid.
2 person-centred
strategies are
identifed with basic
description and
justifcation.
Attempts to use
scholarly references
Detailed description
of 2 strategies that
are likely to promote
person-centred
practice, with
detailed justifcation.
Uses scholarly
references.
Clear and concise
description of 2
thoughtful strategies
for promoting
person-centredness,
with thoughtful
justifcation.
Uses a range of
scholarly references
Comprehensive
description of 2
insightful and
well-developed
strategies for
promoting
person-centredness,
with insightful
justifcation.
Uses a wide range of
scholarly references
4 marks0-122.7534

20

CriteriaUnsatisfactoryExpected
performance
High PerformanceExcellent
performance
Outstanding
performance
Academic writing
skills
Assignment is
disorganised;
paragraphs have no
clear point and/or
structure.
References not
according to APA
style, with frequent
errors.
Non-conventional
spelling, punctuation
and grammar
interfere with
meaning.
Limited use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions.
Attempts to structure
the assignment,
however, paragraphs
may contain
irrelevant contents.
APA style used
inconsistently. Some
references missing or
incorrect.
Frequent errors in
spelling, punctuation
and grammar but
they do not interfere
with meaning.
Attempts to use
academic vocabulary
and expressions,
though with
occasional errors
Assignment is mostly
well constructed;
paragraphs mostly
contain relevant
contents.
Referencing mostly
follows APA style,
with some errors only.
Occasional errors in
spelling,
punctuations, and
grammar.
Suffcient use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions, may
be with some errors.
Assignment is
generally well
constructed with
clear paragraphs.
Referencing generally
follows APA style,
with some minor
errors only.
Conventional spelling,
grammar and
punctuation, with
some minor errors.
Competent use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions,
maybe with some
minor errors only.
Assignment is
consistently well
constructed with
clear and concise
paragraphs.
Referencing
consistently follows
APA style, with no
errors.
. Conventional
spelling, grammar
and punctuation,
maybe with some
typos only.
Advanced use of
academic vocabulary
and expressions.
4 marks0-122.7534
Tentative Markout of 40

DEDUCTIONS

Word limitIs under or above the word limit by
more than 150 words (10%)
(word count does not including
references/reference list)
Deduct 2 marks
Late Turnitin SubmissionDeduct 10% of the assignment’s
worth for each day the assignment
is late (incl. Sat/Sun)
(ref: UWS Assessment Policy)
Deduct 3 marks per each day

FINAL MARK: out of 40
21
2.5.4 Unit Reviews

Weight:20%
Type of Collaboration:Individual
Due:Review 1: Week 8, Friday 24th April at 5pm; Review 2: Week 14, Friday 5th June at
5pm
Submission:online via vUWS
Format:Unit reviews will comprise of up to 30 questions. Students will have 45 minutes to
complete the quiz online via vUWS.
Length:2 quizzes, 10% each, 45 minutes each
Curriculum Mode:Multiple Choice

The unit reviews are designed to test your understanding of content given in lectures and tutorials midway through
the semester (week 8) and at the end of semester (week 14). Students will be required to complete two unit reviews.
Each review will be in a quiz format and will be located on the 400871 vUWS site. The Week 8 Unit Review will
assess content from weeks 3-7 and the Week 14 Unit Review will assess content from weeks 8, 10-14. Unit reviews
will comprise of up to 30 questions. Students will have 30 minutes to complete the quiz online via vUWS. It is
expected that you spend roughly 1.5 hours preparing for each quiz by reviewing relevant lecture & tutorial notes and
readings.

2 Unit Reviews:
Review 1 Due: Week 8, Friday 24th April at 5pm
Review 2 Due: Week 14, Friday 5th June at 5pm
Will assess content from:
wks 3-7 ;
wks 8, 10-14

Resources:
Content given in lectures and tutorials face-to-face and on vUWS.
22
2.5.5 Participation

Weight:10%
Type of Collaboration:Individual
Due:In tutorials in Weeks 3-8, 10-14
Submission:During weekly tutorials
Format:In-class participation
Length:11 weeks
Curriculum Mode:Participation

Student participation in each weekly face to face or online tutorials will be assessed out of 10 marks by their tutor.
The student’s overall tutorial participation grade will be the average of the marks they receive in Weeks 3-8, 10-14
tutorials.
Students will be assessed according to:
– The student’s preparedness for tutorials, including being on time and completing pre-tutorial activities and/or
worksheets;
– The quality of the student’s contributions to the tutorial activity/discussion;
– The quality of the student’s interaction with the tutor and other tutorial participants
Warning: During computer-based tutorials students are not to open un-related web-based sites such as personal
mail or facebook. Students found to be doing this will be at risk of failing the participation requirements for that
tutorial class.
Note: If students are unable to attend a tutorial, they should complete a special consideration form (up to two days
after the tutorial) and submit it to Student Central. Special consideration will only be granted in extreme cases of
misadventure or illness
Note: If special consideration is granted, the student’s mark for the week will be calculated based on the mean
tutorial participation mark for other weeks which they attended tutorials for the unit.
For example, if the student achieves a 6 in week 3, a 7 in week 4 and an 8 in week 5, but they are absent in week
6 and are granted special consideration, the students mark for week 6 will be an average of the preceding marks ie
-6+7+8=21/3=7
Warning: If a student does not attend a tutorial and is not granted special consideration approval, then the student
will receive a zero mark for the tutorial for the week they were absent
Resources:
Tutorial class
23
Marking Criteria:

CriteriaUnsatisfactoryExpected
performance
5-6 marks
High Performance
6.5-7marks
Excellent
performance
7.5-8marks
Outstanding
performance
8.5-10 marks
Preparedness for
tutorials
Absent, or misses
more than 15 minutes
of the tutorial.
No attempt to
complete the
pre-tutorial work.
Completes
pre-tutorial
worksheet/activities
or but with limited
effort
Completes
pre-tutorial
worksheets/activities
with good detail,
maybe with some
errors.
Completes
pre-tutorial work, in
details and with no
errors.
Completes all the
work, with in-depth
ideas and discussions.
Contributions to
tutorial activity
and/or discussion
Limited focus on the
task.
Comments are
generally not
scholarly or relevant
to the discussion.
Contributions make
some relevant points,
although they are
anecdotal with little
use of
literature/readings
Contributions are
informed by reading
and reflection and not
only personal opinion.
Engages with others’
views and contribute
to the discussion in a
constructive way.
Contributions are
thoughtful, informed
by signifcant reading
and reflection.
Contributions extend
the discussion.
Contributions are
informed by extensive
reading and critical
reflection.
Contributions
advance the
discussion.
Interaction with
tutor and other
participants
Is disruptive or rude.
Easily distracted.
Interacts
appropriately and
constructively with
group members and
the tutor.
Interacts and engages
actively, appropriately
and constructively
with group members
and the tutor.
Interacts and engages
actively, appropriately
and constructively
with group members
and the tutor. Is
attentive to others,
shows interest.
Interacts and engages
actively, appropriately
and constructively
with group members
and the tutor. Is
attentive to others,
shows interest and
acknowledges their
contributions

24
2.6 General Submission Requirements
Submission
– All assignments must be submitted by the specifed due date and time.
– Complete your assignment and follow the individual assessment item instructions on how to submit. You must
keep a copy of all assignments submitted for marking.
Turnitin
– The Turnitin plagiarism prevention system may be used within this unit. Turnitin is accessed via logging into
vUWS for the unit. If Turnitin is being used with this unit, this means that your assignments have to be
submitted through the Turnitin system. Turnitin from iParadigms is a web-based text-matching software that
identifes and reports on similarities between documents. It is also widely utilised as a tool to improve academic
writing skills. Turnitin compares electronically submitted papers against the following:
– Current and archived web: Turnitin currently contains over 24 billion web pages including archived pages
– Student papers: including Western Sydney University student submissions since 2007
– Scholarly literature: Turnitin has partnered with leading content publishers, including library databases,
text-book publishers, digital reference collections and subscription-based publications (e.g. Gale, Proquest, Emerald and Sage)
– Turnitin is used by over 30 universities in Australia and is increasingly seen as an industry standard. It is
an important tool to assist students with their academic writing by promoting awareness of plagiarism.By
submitting your assignment to Turnitin you will be certifying that:
– I hold a copy of this assignment if the original is lost or damaged
– No part of this assignment has been copied from any other student’s work or from any other source except
where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment
– No part of the assignment has been written for me by any other person/s
– I have complied with the specifed word length for this assignment
– I am aware that this work may be reproduced and submitted to plagiarism detection software programs for
the purpose of detecting possible plagiarism (which may retain a copy on its database for future plagiarism
checking).
Self-Plagiarising
– You are to ensure that no part of any submitted assignment for this unit or product has been submitted by
yourself in another (previous or current) assessment from any unit, except where appropriately referenced, and
with prior permission from the Lecturer/Tutor/Unit Co-ordinator of this unit.
Late Submission
– If you submit a late assessment, without receiving approval for an extension of time, (see next item), you will
be penalised by 10% per day for up to 10 days. In other words, marks equal to 10% of the assignment’s weight
will be deducted from the mark awarded.
– For example, if the highest mark possible is 50, 5 marks will be deducted from your awarded mark for each late
day.
– Saturday and Sunday are counted as one calendar day each.
– Assessments will not be accepted after the marked assessment task has been returned to students.
– This is consistent with Clause 51 of the Western Sydney University’s Assessment Policy – Criteria and StandardsBased Assessment.
25
Extension of Due Date for Submission
Extensions are only granted in exceptional circumstances. To apply for an extension of time, locate an application
form via the Western Sydney University homepage or copy the following link:
https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/forms
Application forms must be submitted to the Unit Coordinator/Convenor. Requests for extension should be made as
early as possible and submitted within policy deadlines. Appropriate, supporting documentation must be submitted
with the application. An application for an extension does not automatically mean that an extension will be granted.
Assessments will not be accepted after the marked assessment task has been returned to students.
Resubmission
Resubmission of assessment items will not normally be granted if requested.
Application for Special Consideration
It is strongly recommended that you attend all scheduled learning activities to support your learning. If you have
suffered misadventure, illness, or you have experienced exceptional circumstances that have prevented your attendance
at class or your completion and submission of assessment tasks, you may need to apply for Special Consideration via the
Western Sydney University website. http://www.westernsydney.edu.au/currentstudents/current_students/services_
and_facilities/special_consideration2 or the Student Centre/Sydney City Campus Reception. Special Consideration
is not automatically granted. It is your responsibility to ensure that any missed content has been covered. Your
lecturer will give you more information on how this must be done.
26
3 Teaching and Learning Activities

WeeksLectureTutorialReadingsAssessments Due
Week 1
02-03-2020
Introduction to the unit, rationale for
interprofessional education (IPE) –
Health professional defned.
Computer Labs Unit orientation, vUWS
navigation University communication
and email
Freegard, H. (2012). What is a health
professional? In H. Freegard & L. Isted
(Eds.), Ethical practice for health
professionals (pp. 2-10). South
Melbourne, Vic: Thomson.
Week 2
09-03-2020
UWS Library – services, information
literacy strategies and University
Academic Literacy
Computer Labs Time management
strategies vUWS quizzes
LIBRARY TOUR – In week 1 these are
conducted every hour, on the hour from
10am-4pm (ask at the library
information desk)
Week 3
16-03-2020
Turnitin – Academic Integrity & Honesty.
What Turnitin is and how we use it
Computer Labs Library Searching
activity
What is Turnitin and how does it work?
Writing workshops to help develop your
reading and paraphrasing skills are
offered by student support Download
the UWS Library site APA Referencing
Guide available on the vUWS or from
the UWS Library referencing webpage
– Four Online Competency Quizzes
– Participation
Week 4
23-03-2020
Self care and well being as a student
and future health professional
Computer Labs Referencing your sources
using APA Style
Additional resources will be identifed in
vUWS Support services available at
Western include counselling services,
mental health and well-being resources,
disability support services and welfare
services (fnancial hardship,
accommodation diffculties, advocacy).
These services are confdential and free
of charge.
– Participation
Week 5
30-03-2020
Professionalism in the Health Sciences:
Characteristics, obligations, expectations
Computer Labs Library Searching
Activity
Thistlethwaite, J. & McKimm, J.
(2015). Professionalism in context. In
Health care professionalism at a glance
(pp. 2-10). West Sussex, UK: John
Wiley & Sons.
– Four Online Competency Quizzes
– Participation

27

WeeksLectureTutorialReadingsAssessments Due
Week 6
06-04-2020
Ethics and Standards in Health Science
and Health Education practice
Computer Labs Academic research,
reading and writing skills expected at
university.
Freegard, H. (2012). Ethics in a
nutshell. In H. Freegard & L. Isted
(Eds.), Ethical practice for health
professionals (pp.11-24). South
Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. Freegard, H.
(2012). Making ethical decisions. In H.
Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical
practice for health professionals
(pp.71-93). South Melbourne, Vic:
Thomson.
– Participation
Week 7
13-04-2020
WHS and Infection Control in the
Health Sciences
Infection Control Practices in Health:
Hand-washing Room Location TBA
National Health & Medical Research
Council. (2010). Australian guidelines
for the prevention and control of
infection in healthcare. Canberra, ACT:
Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved
December 20, 2016 from
– Annotated Bibliography
– Participation
Week 8
20-04-2020
Client centred professional practice in
the health sciences
Tutorial Room Manual handling in
Health Science Practice
To be updated in vUWS– Unit Reviews
– Participation
Week 9
27-04-2020
INTRA-SESSION BREAKINTRA-SESSION BREAKINTRA-SESSION BREAK
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_fles_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cd33_infection_control_healt28
WeeksLectureTutorialReadingsAssessments Due
Week 10
04-05-2020
International Classifcation of
Function[ICF]- A theoretical framework
for client-centred interprofessional
collaboration
Tutorial Room Case studies –
Understanding the client’s experience
using a client centred approach and the
ICF
World Health Organization (2002).
Towards a common language for
functioning, disability and health.
Retrieved February 14, 2018, from
http://www.who.int/classifcations/icf/ic
Schneidert, M., Hurst, R., Miller, J., &
Ustun, B. (2003). The role of
environment in the International
Classifcation of Function, Disability and
Health(ICF). Disability and
Rehabilitation, 25 (11-12), 588-595.
doi: 10.1080/0963828031000137090
McIntyre, A. (2009). Documentation
and the use of the ICF in
interprofessional working. In A. Atwal &
M. Jones (Eds.), Preparing for
professional practice in health and social
care (pp.113-130). Oxford, UK:
Wiley-Blackwell.
fbeginnersguide.pdf?ua=1
– Four Online Competency Quizzes
– Participation
Week 11
11-05-2020
Health science teamsTutorial Room Case Studies – Identifying
core and differentiating health
professional roles using the ICF
Freegard, H. & Isted, L. (2012).
Teamwork. In H. Freegard & L. Isted
(Eds.), Ethical practice for health
professionals (pp.165-173). South
Melbourne, Vic: Thomson. Atwal, A., &
Smith, W. (2009). Interprofessional
teamwork. In A. Atwal & M. Jones
(Eds.), Preparing for professional
practice in health and social care (pp.
1-20). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
– Participation
Week 12
18-05-2020
Health Science practice and the lawTutorial Room Understanding the
inter-professional team, professional
roles and identity
Freegard, H. (2012). What is law? In H.
Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical
practice for health professionals
(pp.25-42). South Melbourne, Vic:
Thomson. Russell, M. (2012).
Regulation of the professions. In H.
Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical
practice for health professionals (pp.
43-56). South Melbourne, Vic:
Thomson.
– Participation

29

WeeksLectureTutorialReadingsAssessments Due
Week 13
25-05-2020
Child protection Policies and procedure
in Health and Education
Tutorial Room Duty of Care – Risk
miminisation – Hazard reduction Safe
health science practice: Regulatory
obligations to declare and report
FOR HPE Students NSW Department
of Education and Training. (2010).
Responding to allegations against
employees in the area of child
protection. Sydney, NSW: Author.
Retrieved December 20, 2016, from
https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy
library/associated
documents/respondwoutdisc.pdf For All
Other Students NSW Health. (2013).
Child wellbeing and child protection
policies and procedures for NSW Health.
(Publication no. PP2013_007).
Retrieved February 24, 2014, from
http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/
Online Mandatory Reporter Guide
https://reporter.childstory.nsw.gov.au/s/
pd/2013/pdf/PD2013_007.pdf
– Four Online Competency Quizzes
– Participation
Week 14
01-06-2020
Professional Self Care and Career
Development
Tutorial Room Case Studies related to
child protection
Blank, A. (2009). Reflection and
professional practice. In A. Atwal & M.
Jones (Eds.), Preparing for professional
practice in health and social care
(pp.41-50). Oxford, UK:
Wiley-Blackwell. Cooper, I. (2012).
Professional boundaries: Forming
relationships and working unsupervised.
In H. Freegard & L. Isted (Eds.), Ethical
practice for health professionals (pp.
174-197). South Melbourne, Vic:
Thomson.
– Case Study Assignment
– Unit Reviews
– Participation
Week 15
08-06-2020
StuvacStuvacStuvac
Week 16
15-06-2020
ExamsExamsExams
Week 17
22-06-2020
ExamsExamsExams

The above timetable should be used as a guide only, as it is subject to change. Students will be advised of any changes as they become known on the unit’s vUWS site.
30
4 Learning Resources
4.1 Recommended Readings
Essential Reading
Atwal, A., & Jones, M. (Eds.). (2009). Preparing for professional practice in health and social care. Chichester,
U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. Available as an ebook via the library webpage.
Freegard, H. C., & Isted, L. (Eds.). (2012). Ethical practice for health professionals (2nd ed.). South Melbourne,
Vic: Cengage Learning Australia.
31

The post 400871 Professional Health Competencies appeared first on My Assignment Online.

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers ✓ Deadline from 3 hours ✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included ✓ Unlimited free revisions ✓ Free to submit — compare quotes

admin

Academic writer and editor at BestWriters.

Get your paper off your plate tonight

Post your instructions for free. Prices start at $5 per page.

Place an order