COIT20267 Computer Forensics
Assessment Specification
| Due date: | Week 12 Friday (5 Jun. 2020) 11:55 am AEST | ASSESSMENT |
| Weighting: Length: |
45% 3,500 words (excluding title page, ToC and references list) |
3 |
Objectives
This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcome 1 to 7 as stated on the unit profile.
1. Apply the computer forensics methodologies.
2. Write an analysis of a case study.
3. Prepare an outline of a professional computer forensic plan.
Instructions
This assessment is a group assessment where group is made of 2-3(three) students. Each group need to choose
a case study given in ‘case study’ section and perform activities from ‘Assessment activities’ section. Outcome
of the assessment will be a report for the entire group. Follow instructions given in ‘what to submit?’ section
of this document to prepare a report and submit on Moodle. The report must be cohesive and fit well together.
Length. The report should be limited to 3,500 words in length, excluding title page, ToC and references list.
10% leeway on either side is applicable.
Assumptions. Students are encouraged to make assumptions wherever necessary subject to two conditions:
(1) assumptions should not contradict with the factual information given in the case; (2) assumptions,once
made, must be relevant and addressed in your report.
Case study: As a group choose one from given cases
below for this assignment:
1. Case one – Electronic eavesdropping
2. Case Two – Exfiltration of corporate IP
3. Case Three– Illegal digital materials
Assessment activities:
I) In capacity of a computer forensics specialist, your task is to prepare a computer forensics investigation
plan to enable a systematic collection of evidence and subsequent forensic analysis of the electronic and
digital data. This plan should detail the following:
• Justify why the use of the digital forensic methodology and approach is warranted including
appropriate procedures for the Company’s investigation.
• Describe the resources required to conduct a digital forensic investigation, including skill sets and
the required software and hardware for the forensics team members.
• Outline an approach for data/evidence identification and acquisition that should occur in order to
be able to identify and review the digital evidence.
• Outline an approach and steps to be taken during the analysis phase.
II) Investigate the collected evidences below to answer the question asked in the case study
• Hard drive images –
o charlie-2009-12-11.E01
o pat-2009-12-11.E01
o terry-2009-12-11-002.E01
o jo-2009-12-11-002.E01
• RAM Images –
o pat-2009-12-11.mddramimage.zip
o charlie-2009-12-11.mddramimage.zip
• USB Drive images
o charlie-work-usb-2009-12-11.E01
o jo-work-usb-2009-12-11.E01
III) Report the evidence and validation to support the answer of your investigation outcome
Tips for preparing your computer forensics investigative plan
In writing the computer forensics investigative plan, students need to address following points. Do note that
points listed below are not exhaustive and need to be considered as helpful tips.
• Justify a need for computer forensics methodology and consider scope of the case including nature of
alleged misconduct leading to consideration of how electronic and digital evidence may support the
investigation. The plan should consider how computer forensics differs from other techniques (such as
network forensics, data recovery) and detail the overall steps for the systematic computer forensics
approach.
• Consider the required resources and include details regarding preparation plan for evidence gathering
(such as evidence forms, types, storage media and containers), forensics workstation and peripherals
needed, software/tools for analysis depending on the type of evidence to be gathered including rationale
for selected tools, and consideration of team member skills in digital analysis (such as OS knowledge,
skills for interviewing, consultation, working as per the needs of the auditing team and understanding of
law and corporate policies).
• Detail the approach for data acquisition including the different types of evidence that can be gathered and
their source depending upon the nature of the case and scope of investigation, develop a plan for data
acquisition including rationale for selected plan and contingency planning, detail type of data acquisition
tools needed including rationale and an outline for the data validation & verification procedures.
• Provide an outline of the forensic analysis procedures/steps depending upon the nature of evidence to be
collected and detail the validation approach. This can include techniques to counter data hiding,
recovering deleted files, procedures for network and e-mail analysis.
• Prepare a professional report with an Executive Summary, a Word generated table of contents, an
Introduction, a body of the report with proper headings and sub-headings, and a Conclusion.
• Table of contents for the investigative plan should consider what to include in report, structure of report,
focus or scope of the report including supporting material to be provided and references. This table of
contents should include headings and sub-headings pertaining to the aspects addressed in the above dot
points.
What to submit?
Specifically, your report should include the following sections.
1. Title page: (each) student name (in your group), (each) student number (in your group), (each)
student email address (in your group, use CQU email), title of your report, local lecturer/tutor, and
unit coordinator. Not counted towards the word count.
2. Executive summary.
3. Table of Contents (ToC): should list the report (sub)sections in decimal notation. Create the ToC
using MS Word’s ToC auto-generator rather than manually typing out the ToC. Instructions can be
foundhere: https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/create-a-table-of-contents-882e8564-0edb-
435e84b5-1d8552ccf0c0?redirectSourcePath=%252fen-gb%252farticle%252fCreate-a-table-ofcontentsor-update-a-table-of-contents-eb275189-b93e-4559-8dd9-c279457bfd72&ui=en
US&rs=enGB&ad=GB# create_a_table. Not counted towards the word count.
4. Introduction.
5. Body of the report –
• Computer forensics investigation plan
• Investigation outcome to answer the question and evidence to support your answer.
6. Conclusion.
7. Reference list: all references must be in Harvard Referencing Style. Not counted towards the word
count.
________________________________________________________________________________________
General Assessment Criteria
Incomprehensible submissions. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their
knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear
and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their
knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero)
marks where relevant.
Late penalty. Late submissions will attract penalties at 5% for each day or part thereof that it is late of the total
available mark for the individual assessment item. This means that, for an assessment worth 45 marks, the
mark that you earn is reduced by 2.25 marks each day that the assessment is late (including part-days and
weekends).
Check the marking criteria. Before submitting your assignment, you should check it against the detailed
assessment criteria included in this specification to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria
that will be used to mark your assignment.
Academic Language. All submissions should be thoroughly proof-read for spelling, typographical or
grammatical errors before being submitted. Do not rely on the ‘spell-check’ function in your word processing
program. If, for example, ‘affect’ is substituted for ‘effect’, your program may not detect the error.
Academic Integrity
All assignments will be checked for plagiarism (material copied from other students and/or material copied
from other sources) using Turnitin. If you are found to have plagiarised material or if you have used someone
else’s words without appropriate referencing, you will be penalised for plagiarism which could result in zero
marks for the whole assignment. In some circumstances a more severe penalty may be imposed.
Useful information about academic integrity (avoiding plagiarism) can be found at: CQUniversity referencing
guides
https://www.cqu.edu.au/student-life/services-and-facilities/referencing/cquniversity-referencing-guides
Submission requirements
Who to submit? For on-campus students, one and only one of the group members needs to submit for the
entire group. Distance students need to submit individually.
What to submit? A report in MS Word format (.doc or .docx) needs to be submitted. No other document
formats are accepted (no PDF files, Apple Pages, Apple Keynotes or Online Google Doc Link). No Zipped
files. Students must not zip multiple files and submit it as one single zip/compressed file.
Means of submission. All assignments must be submitted electronically to Moodle. The submission links can
be accessed through the Assessment block on the Moodle unit website. Physical copies/ Email submissions are
not accepted.
Auto-submission. Moodle implements an auto-submission process for those items uploaded and left as drafts
before the original deadline. However, any assessments uploaded after the original deadline must be manually
submitted by the students.
Please note that auto-submission process does not work for assessments which have extensions. Auto
submission only works where the original deadline of an assessment has not changed. If you are submitting
after the deadline (original or extended), you must complete the Moodle submission process. Further details
on completing the submission process are available via the ‘Moodle Help for Students’ link in the Support
block of your Moodle pages.
Complete and correct submission. Requests for changing files after the submission deadline may be granted
if the Unit Coordinator is contacted. However, if a change of files is allowed by the Unit Coordinator, then the
submission time will be taken as the latest time (i.e. when the last update is made), not the original submission
time. That will result in a late penalty.
Assessment criteria
| COIT20267 Assessment item 3 – Case study | |||||
| Criteria | Performance levels | ||||
| Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Improving 3 |
Accomplished 4 |
Exemplary 5 |
Score |
| Justification – Is the justification of “why use of the computer forensic methodology and approach is warranted” sound? |
|||||
| Resources – Are the resources required to conduct a computer forensic investigation completely listed? |
|||||
| Approach – Is the approach for evidence identification and acquisition reasonable? |
|||||
| Steps – Are steps to be taken during the analysis phase reasonable? |
|||||
| Correctness of the answer | |||||
| Reporting of investigation outcome with evidence |
|||||
| Reporting the validation of evidence for court |
|||||
| Table of contents – Is the table of contents professionally prepared? |
|||||
| References – Are the references correctly cited? |
|||||
| Total | |||||
| Comments: | |||||
| Marker: | Date: |
The post COIT20267 Computer Forensics appeared first on My Assignment Online.