1. What is the argument Luban offers for the hybrid war-law model? What is the argument he offers against it? Which side of the argument is more compatible with respect for human rights? What do you mean when you say ‘right?” Does it matter which side is more compatible with respect for human rights? Explain.
Cite all the texts you employ. This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts.
2. Why does Marquis think abortion is immoral? What is his argument? Thomson argues that abortion is permissible, at least in a wide range of cases. What are those cases and what is/are her arguments?
Do Marquis’s arguments challenge those of Thomson, or can one endorse both positions without contradiction? Justify your answer in either case.
Cite all the texts you employ. This is at 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts.
3. HCC says the following: “We will be the opportunity institution for every student we serve – essential to our community’s success.”Broadly – and incompletely – ‘success’ can be interpreted in two ways here. What might they be? Is there a notion of ‘success’ that our community could achieve that is somehow not worth achieving?
