Assessment Type Individual
Assessment Number 2 and 3
Assessment Name Report and Presentation
Unit Learning Outcomes
Assessed 1,2,3,4,5 and 6
Due Date and Time Assessment 2 : 8/February/2019, Upload report on Moodle
Assessment 3 : 7/February/2019, In class presentation
Weighting Assessment 2 Report 25%, Assessment 3 Presentation 10%
Assessment Description Assessment 2 : Opportunity Analysis and Development Report (Around 2000 words, Turnitin submission)
In the unit, you learnt that entrepreneurs are individuals who recognize opportunities where others see chaos or confusion. They challenge the unknown and continuously create the future. In addition, potential entrepreneurs are always looking for unique opportunities to fill needs or wants. They sense economic potential in business problems by continually asking ‘ if only they…’, “what if…?” or ‘ Why not…?” They develop an ability to see, recognize and create opportunity where others find only problems.
Think about the following areas to get a sense of ideation and initial concept:
- Look for new Your next business idea doesn’t have to reinvent the
wheel. Can you build a better mousetrap?
- Apply your skills to an entirely new Think about your skills and whether they might be useful in a new area?
- Find a category lacking recent innovations. Revisit Module 2 on Innovations.
- Make a cheaper version of an existing product. Companies often get their start by offering customers an existing product at a lower
- Have an idea quota; write ideas down. You need to be as tenacious as you can with this. Every day, set out an idea quota within a period of roughly 45 minutes to an hour, where you do nothing but write down ideas about the area that interests
- Creative Mind Tools such as brainstorming – a method for obtaining new ideas focusing on the parameters. 7) OR, Reverse Brainstorming – A group method for obtaining new ideas focusing on the
After you come up with a promising insight, there is no guarantee that success will follow, of course. You need to turn a great insight into a thriving business, which is incredibly challenging. You will need to write up around 2,000 word summary of your key findings, critique and insight in your evaluation. The following structure is best suggested for this document:
- Introduction In your introduction, you must address which methods you employed from the processes above that lead to your
insight of your idea. You will also use these questions as a guide to your elevator pitch, in part B of the assessment.
- Problem & Need Analysis What problem are you trying to solve? In other words, what do your customers need and how do you know for sure? Look and apply from every angle. Applying this rule means an entrepreneur will analyse a problem from every possible angle: What is the problem? Whom does it affect? How does it affect them? What costs are involved? Can it be solved? Would the marketplace pay for a solution? For bonus points, what type of need is it? (continuing need, declining need, emerging need, future need)
- Consumer Analysis Think about how much is it or how much are customers willing to pay? What are the perceived benefits and risks? Think of appeal characteristics, utility to customer, customer taste and preferences, buying motives, consumption habits).
- Market Analysis How well do you know your competitors? What is the position in the life cycle? What is the market size and potential?
- Internal Capabilities Who are you (what experience, expertise, and talent do you have to offer) and who is on your winning team?
- Commercial Viability What is your unique selling point or value proposition? Is it scalable? What is the return on investment (need to determine the value of the product idea with cash flow, cash inflow, profit, relative return)?
Note: You do not need to do a rigorous screening or evaluation of the business idea. This guide is to give you a taste of what is expected of you on your entrepreneurial educational journey. The guide is enough for you to eliminate those ideas that are impractical and ones that show potential to move toward the concept stage, the product development stage, the test marketing stage, and finally into commercialization.
Assessment 3 : Opportunity Analysis and Development Pitch (10 minutes, in class)
You will produce a maximum 5 minutes (followed by 5 minutes of questions and answer) in class using the opportunity identified in part A to generate interest, intrigue and commitment of financial investment from a venture capitalist. Pitch must frame the value proposition of the opportunity specific to your start-up entrepreneurial firm.
Lecturer and students will ask you questions after the pitch like and investor would. Although it will not be as rigorous as in the case of Shark Tank
(https://tenplay.com.au/channel-ten/shark-tank) it may be toned down
version of it. J
Try and be as innovative as you can and want.
Detailed Submission Requirements
Assessment 2 should be in the format of a report of around 2000 words while assessment 3 will be a 10 minute pitch in class.
| Assessment | ||||||
| Section Requirements | Weight 10% | HIGH DISTINCTION 100-85% | DISTINCTION 84-75% | CREDIT 74-65% | PASS 64-50% | FAIL 49-0% |
| Clear and methodical identification and | Mark | |||||
| rationale/ justification of entrepreneurial | 10 | Excellent outlined | Well-articulated | Some good insight | Developing | No consideration of |
| opportunities (needs/wants canvassed | identification and | identification and | uncovered through | consideration of | opportunities or | |
| thoroughly as well as market analysis) | justification. Excellent | justification of | analysis of emergent | opportunities and | problems faced by | |
| Market analysis with | emergent | opportunities and | challenges faced by | entrepreneurs. | ||
| consideration of | opportunities. Analysis | challenges faced by | entrepreneurs. | |||
| anticipatory problems, | is forward thinking and | entrepreneurs. Some | ||||
| entire evaluation is | anticipatory | basic critical | ||||
| nuanced and | interpretation from | |||||
| considered. | analysis. | |||||
| Demonstration and application of key | Mark | |||||
| processes towards successful new-venture | 10 | Excellent outline and | Well-articulated | Good reflection on | Developing | No consideration of |
| creation; including development | critical analysis of new | analysis of new market | the process of | consideration of | new venture or | |
| practicalities and viability assessment. | market selection, | selection, opportunity | innovation and new | process of new | innovative practices | |
| opportunity | identification and value | market or opportunity | product development | employed by | ||
| identification and value | creation tactics and | analysis processes | and opportunity | entrepreneurs. | ||
| creation tactics and | processes | entrepreneurs | analysis and value | |||
| processes | entrepreneurs employ. | employ. Some basic | creation by | |||
| entrepreneurs employ. | Linked well to | critical interpretation | entrepreneurs. | |||
| Analysis is nuanced | research. | of this and | ||||
| and well supported by | crosscomparison on | |||||
| research and highly | methods. | |||||
| comparative in terms of | ||||||
| various approaches | ||||||
| featured in the unit. | ||||||
| Considered outline of target markets, | ||||||
| stakeholders and industries involved | 5 | Highly nuanced | Nuanced profiling of | Nicely summarized | Irrelevant profiling of | Unclear or missing |
| overview of key | key stakeholders and | stakeholders. Key | key stakeholders and | outline of key | ||
| stakeholders and | industries with some | operating industries | involved industries. | stakeholders involved | ||
| industries with | developed rationale. | outlined well. | Lack of rationale | |||
| excellent rationale and | provided | |||||
| consistent justification . | ||||||
| Substantive evidence of preparation; including professionalism in pitch presentation.
Supporting documentation reflects Harvard citation and referencing guidelines. |
10 | Outstanding preparation and confidence of commercial language with high regard for professional audience. Enthusiastic, engaged, and prepared, with correct citations throughout. | Very good preparation and use of professional language in presentation. High enthusiasm and commercial relevance. Report includes highly accurate citations and correct referencing. | Good demonstration of professionalism in presentation and report preparation. Report includes very good citations and correct referencing using APA/Harvard referencing style | Developing grasp of professional presentation and preparation. Report includes mostly accurate citations and referencing with some errors. | Lacking preparation for task. Developing citation and reference ability not conforming to APA/Harvard referencing style. |
| TOTAL MARK | 35 | Overall comments: | ||||