Structure & Marking Guide
Structure
Structure of the consolidated portfolio must be as follows:
1. Introduction and summary of all six (6) learning outcomes of the unit
2. Itemise each learning outcome (LO):
a. LO1
i. Summary
ii. Evidence
b. LO2
i. Summary
ii. Evidence
c. LO3
i. Summary
ii. Evidence
d. … so on
3. Discussion and Conclusion
4. References
5. Appendix of the weekly portfolios
a. Week 1 Portfolio
b. Week 2 Portfolio
c. Week 3 Portfolio
d. … so on
Items 1, 2 & 3 above should be around 6 – 8 pages but not less. Each learning outcome should contain at least two to three paragraphs.
The most important thing is to say how you achieved each learning outcome. This can be achieved through the summary and evidence which points to each week’s portfolio in the Appendix.
Marking Guide
|
Max.
|
|||
|
Assessment Criteria
|
Score
|
||
|
Evidence in regular weekly portfolios of meeting the graduate attributes:
|
|||
|
1. Knowledge
|
|||
|
2. Communication
|
|||
|
3.
|
Cognitive, technical and creative skills
|
20%
|
|
|
4.
|
Research
|
||
|
5. Self-management
|
|||
|
6.
|
Ethical and Professional Responsibility
|
||
|
Qualitative reflections of each of the unit learning outcomes:
|
|||
|
1.
|
Does it meet all the relevant basic learning requirements? (10%)
|
||
|
2.
|
Does it reflect an ability to use and apply fundamental concepts and skills of the unit?
|
||
|
(10%)
|
40%
|
||
|
3. Does it demonstrate awareness and understanding of deeper and less obvious aspects of
|
|||
|
the unit? (10%)
|
|||
|
4.
|
Has it been presented with imagination, originality or flair, based on proficiency in all the
|
||
|
learning outcomes of the unit? (10%)
|
|||
|
Quantitative achievement of the unit weekly topics:
|
|||
|
1. Commercial Planning and Commercial Projects?
|
|||
|
2.
|
Contractual Arrangements in Commercial Projects?
|
||
|
3.
|
Argument; Logic; Ethics?
|
||
|
4.
|
Theory of Negotiation and Negotiation in Practice?
|
||
|
5. The Role of the Project Manager in Commercial Negotiation?
|
|||
|
6.
|
Managing Stakeholders’ Commercial Interests vs. Stakeholders’ Political Interests?
|
20%
|
|
|
7. Communicating in Commercial Negotiation vs. Project Communication?
|
|||
|
8.
|
Commercial Conflict Resolution?
|
||
|
9.
|
Disputes, Claims, Variations, and Arbitration?
|
||
|
10. Commercial Negotiation in Government vs. Private Organisations?
|
|||
|
11. Applying Project Management Standards and Frameworks?
|
|||
|
12. The Future of Commercial Negotiation?
|
|||
|
Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling?
|
5%
|
||
|
Strict conformity to CQUniversity Australia Harvard Referencing Guide?
|
5%
|
||
|
Document clarity and presentation format?
|
10%
|
||
|
Total %age:
|
100%
|
||
|
Scaled marks:
|
30%
|
||
