Evaluation of Marginalized Women Guidelines & Grading Rubric
Requirements
This paper should clearly and comprehensively identify the disease or population health problem chosen. The problem must be an issue in your geographic area and a concern for the population you will serve upon graduation with your degree. The paper should be organized into the following sections:
1. Introduction with a clear presentation of the marginalized group as well as significance and a scholarly overview of the paper.
2. Background of the marginalized group/problem including description, current incidence and/or prevalence statistics current state, local, and national statistics pertaining to the problem.
3. Discuss the economic aspects of the marginalized group
4. Discuss social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of marginalized group.
5. Discuss ethical issues on marginalized group
6. Provide a brief plan of how you will address this marginalized group in your practice once you are finished with school. Provide three actions you will take along with how you will measure outcomes of your actions.
7. Conclude in a clear manner with a brief overview of key points of the entire problem
Preparing the Paper
TOPIC
· Women with Past Sexual Assault
Paper Length: 5-6 pages, excluding title/cover and reference pages
APA format 6th edition
Directions and Grading Criteria
Category
Points
Possible
Points Earned
Comments
Scholarly Introduction (clear presentation of marginalized group)
20
Background and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence or prevalence statistics)
20
Socio-Economic aspects of the marginalized group
20
Social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of marginalized group
20
Ethical issues of the marginalized group
25
Plan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured)
30
Conclusion
10
Mechanics of writing, APA
5
Total
150
Total Points earned =
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the criteria requirements.
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR602
May 2018
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance
Identification of the chosen marginalized group
20 Points
18 Points
16 Points
8 Points
0 Points
Comprehensively identifies the chosen marginalized group.
Adequately identifies chosen marginalized group.
Identification of chosen marginalized group is limited.
Identification of chosen marginalized group is unclear.
Identification of chosen marginalized group is missing or not discussed.
Background and significance of the marginalized group (includes incidence and prevalence statistics)
20 Points
18 Points
16 Points
8 Points
0 Points
Comprehensive review of background and significance of chosen marginalized group. Curent evidence supports background.
An adequate review of background but limited review of incidence or prevalence. Current evidence supports background and significance.
Limited review of Background AND limited review of incidence/prevalence. OR Lack current evidence to support.
Background, incidence and prevalence is unclear. missing one or more key point (background, prevelance or incidence). AND Lack of evidence to support.
Background and significance of the marginalized group is not discussed.
Socio-Economic issues of the problem
20 Points
18 Points
16 Points
8 Points
0 Points
Clearly presents and fully explains the socio economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence.
Adequate review of socio-economic issues of marginalized group with current supporting evidence.
Limited review of the socio-economic issues of marginalized group OR Lack of current supporting evidence.
Minimal or unclear review socio-economic issues of marginalized group AND lack of current supporting evidence.
Socio-Economic issue(s) not reviewed.
Social justice and its relationship to health disparities and health care of chosen marginalized group
20 Points
18 Points
16 Points
8 Points
0 Points
Comprehensive review social injustice is discussed along with its relationship to health disparitities and health care. Supported by current scholarly evidence.
Adequate review of social injustice with some discussion of its relationship to health disparities and health care but lacks one major point or is not succinct. supported by current scholarly evidence.
Limited review of social injustice. Limitied discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care. Main points lack detailed development.
Supported by current scholarly evidence.
Minimal review of social injustice. Minimal discussion of relationship to health disparitities and health care.
OR
Information presented is NOT Supported by current scholarly evidence.
No discussion of social injustice and relationship to health disparitities and health care.
Ethical issues of the chosen marginalized group
25 Points
22 Points
21 Points
10 Points
0 Points
Comprehensive review of ethical issues current supporting evidence.
Adequate review of ethical issues. Main points lack detailed development. Current supporting evidence.
Limited review of ethical issues. list ethical issues or arrange them randomly rather than using any logical structure.
OR
Lack of cuurent supporting evidence.
Minimal or unclear review of ethical issues AND lack of current supporting evidence.
Ethical issues are not discussed.
Plan of action (includes at least three evidenced based actions, supported by literature, that the student will take in their own practice and how outcomes will be measured)
30 Points
26 Points
24 Points
12 Points
0 Points
A comprehensive plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; three evidence-based actions to address the impact AND outcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence.
An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group;
OR
Two evidence- based actions fully discussed to address the impact AND outcomes of the marginalized group. Supported by current scholarly evidence.
A limited plan of action specific to the chosen marginalized group; Two evidence-based actions discussed to address the impact.
Outcomes not discussed.
Limited or little current evidence used for support.
Plan is unclear OR One evidence- based actions discussed to address the impact.
Outcomes not discussed
AND Lack of current supporting evidence.
Plan of action not provided.
Conclusion
10 Points
9 Points
8 Points
4 Points
0 Points
The conclusion thoroughly, clearly, succinctly, and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action.
The conclusion presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action, but lacks one major point or is not succinct.
The conclusion is a limited review of key points of the paper, is not succinct, or lacks one or more major points of the paper or clear direction for action.
Conclusion is unclear or significantly limited in overview of the paper.
Conclusion not provided.
Grammar, Spelling, APA
5 Points
4 Points
3 Points
2 Points
0 Points
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors.
One to three errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
Post contains ten or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and punctuation
OR repeatedly makes the same errors throughout the paper.
Total Points Possible = 150 points