Option #1: Leadership Styles Paper Whether you plan to serve as a leader or not, it is beneficial to identify your leadership style. At some point in your life or career, you may be faced with leading a project, directing a social group,

Module 4: Critical Thinking

·        Points 60

·        Submitting a file upload

Critical Thinking Assignment (60 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Note that while there are two options for the Critical Thinking Assignment, there is only one rubric. Review the rubric to confirm you are meeting the assignment requirements.

Option #1:  Leadership Styles Paper                                                                                                                                                   

Whether you plan to serve as a leader or not, it is beneficial to identify your leadership style. At some point in your life or career, you may be faced with leading a project, directing a social group, or providing some oversight for an initiative personally or professionally. Knowing your leadership style can help you to recognize your response and approach to situations and hone the skills that could better the situation. Complete the leadership style assessment: What’s Your Leadership Style? (Links to an external site.) Then:

• Write a 3-4-page paper in APA format.

• Include the following assignment points:

1. Summarize your assessment outcomes and leadership style. a. You can include charts, figures, or graphs if you choose

2. Describe how your leadership style benefits you personally and/or professionally.

3. Summarize the pros and cons for this leadership type

4. Use one or more articles or credible sources from the CSU-Global library to support your ideas, assertions, and claims.

Option #2:  Leadership Styles Presentation                                                                                                                                   

Whether you plan to serve as a leader or not, it is beneficial to identify your leadership style. At some point in your life or career, you may be faced with leading a project, directing a social group, or providing some oversight for an initiative personally or professionally. Knowing your leadership style can help you to recognize your response and approach to situations and hone the skills that could better the situation. Complete the leadership style assessment: What’s Your Leadership Style? (Links to an external site.) Then:

• Develop a PowerPoint or other digital presentation.

• Include the following assignment points:

1. Summarize your assessment outcomes and leadership style. a. You can include charts, figures, or graphs if you choose

2. Describe how your leadership style benefits you personally and/or professionally.

3. Summarize the pros and cons for this leadership type

4. Use one or more articles or credible sources from the CSU-Global library to support your ideas, assertions, and claims.

Rubric

ORG300 CT M4

ORG300 CT M4

Criteria

Ratings

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

10.0 to >9.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment

9.0 to >7.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

7.0 to >5.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

5.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

15.0 to >13.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of leadership vision, goals and organizational planning models correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

13.0 to >10.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

10.0 to >7.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

7.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

15.0 to >13.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of leadership vision, goals and planning.

13.0 to >10.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10.0 to >7.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

7.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10.0 to >9.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

9.0 to >7.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

7.0 to >5.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

5.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >9.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

9.0 to >7.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

7.0 to >5.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

5.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

Total Points: 60.0

 

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We'll find the best professional writer for you!

GET THIS ANSWER FROM EXPERTS NOW

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?