Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now

CAS 102: Groupwork

By /

CAS
102: Groupwork

Assessment
3B: Written Reflection 25% (1500-2000 words): Individual Assessment

You are required to
write a reflection of your online group work planning session. Please
ensure that you incorporate the class content and weekly readings
into your reflection, and clearly reference the literature and class
content. Your paper will include a reflection on your online
discussion with your classmates but should also take into account the
way that you would proceed with future group sessions in order to
ensure the group functions effectively.

In your reflection
you might consider some of the following aspects

  • Models and
    theories of group work
  • What was your
    role in the group?
  • What did you
    do well?
  • What would
    you do differently next time?
  • Content what
    was specifically discussed?
  • Members
    present
  • Communication
    patterns

    • Expressing
      (verbal nonverbal)
    • Listening

    • Responding
    • Directionality

      • Member to
        member
      • Member to
        group
      • Member to
        leader
      • Leader to
        member
      • Leader to
        group
  • Group climate
    or mood
  • Group purpose
  • Group rules
  • The anxiety
    level of the group
  • The
    cohesiveness of the group
  • Conflict was
    this apparent, how was it dealt with?
  • Decision
    making processes
  • Feelings that
    you experienced during the process
Criteria
for essay 		High
Distinction
80%
– 		Distinction
70%-
79% 		Credit
60-69% 		Pass
50-59% 		Fail
0-49%
Analysis
of literature on topic
 Provides
accurate
and complete explanations of
group work processes, drawing on most recent scholarly literature

Provides
accurate
and complete explanations of
group work processes, drawing on relevant literature

Provides
some accurate explanations of group work processes and often
cites the
relevant literature.

Provides
some accurate explanations of group work processes but not always
accurate and sometimes incomplete, sometimes
cites the
relevant literature.

Has
limited explanations of group work processes but research is
inaccurate or incomplete, does not cite the
relevant literature.

Conclusions
derived from analysis and assessment of the topic 		Shows
a deep understanding of
how potential issues can be identified and their impact when
working with a group 		Shows
an excellent understanding of
how potential issues can be identified and their impact when
working with a group 		Shows
a good understanding of
how potential issues can be identified and their impact when
working with a group 		Shows
a basic understanding of
how potential issues can be identified and their impact when
working with a group 		Shows
poor, insufficient understanding of
how potential issues can be identified and their impact working
with a group
Use
and depth of reflection 		A
comprehensive analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows
insightful synthesis of
the literature information, including
analysis of gaps and/or
limitations
when working with a group 		A
strong analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful
synthesis of
the literature information, including
analysis of gaps and/or
limitations
when working with a group 		A
good analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows some insightful
synthesis of
the literature information, identifies
some limitations of when working with a group 		Analysis
is fairly well developed. It
summarizes the overall information obtained from the literature
reviews and synthesizes
adequately the
knowledge gained when working with a group 		Analysis
is
not well developed. It
lacks summary and/or
any synthesis of
the relevant literature for working with a group
Presentation
of summary and correct references used 		All
levels of content are covered in depth. Wide range of contemporary
references and sources are well cited when specific statements are
made 		High
level of content is covered in depth. Wide range of good
references and sources are well cited when specific statements are
made 		Appropriate
content is covered in reasonable depth. Sources are generally well
cited when specific statements are made 		Most
major sections of the relevant content included, but not covered
in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected
References
were basic and some errors of citation 		Major
sections of relevant content have been omitted or missed
Inadequate references and poor citation
TOTAL

The post CAS 102: Groupwork appeared first on My Assignment Online.

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers ✓ Deadline from 3 hours ✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included ✓ Unlimited free revisions ✓ Free to submit — compare quotes

Related Posts

Scroll to Top