Page | 1
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Unit Code and Title: SBM3302 Project Execution Planning and Management
Assessment Overview
| Assessment Task | Weighting | Due | Length | ULO | CLO | GA |
| Assessment 1: Quiz Quiz of key content areas to identify further support needs (Closed book) |
10% | Week 3 | 30 mins | ULO-1 | CLO-1 CLO-2 |
|
| Assessment 2: Case Study A case study for students to practice the contract management concepts |
30% | Week 6 | 2500 words | ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 |
CLO1, CLO2, CLO5, CLO7, CLO9 |
GA2, GA7, GA11 |
| Assessment 3: Report and Presentation The assignment is designed for students to practice the tender proposal processes and documentations. Students are required to present and defend to their client their RFP and tender documents in a “Bid opening session”. |
30% | Week 10 | 2000 words and 12 Slides |
ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 |
CLO1, CLO2, CLO5, CLO7 CLO8 CLO9 |
GA2, GA7, GA8, GA11 |
| Assessment 4: Scenario Analysis In this assessment, students are required to analyse scenarios based on several case studies |
30% | Week 12 | 2000 words | ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4], [ULO5] |
CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-4 |
Assessment Details
Page | 2
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 1: Quiz
| Due date: | Week 3 |
| Group/individual: | Individual |
| Word count / Time provided: | 30 minutes |
| Weighting: | 10% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO-1 |
| Course Learning Outcomes: | CLO-1, CLO-2 |
| Graduate Attributes: |
Assessment Details:
This quiz will assess your knowledge of key content areas (Week 1 & 2 content) and to identify further
support needs. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided
(lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion
forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material.
By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of risk
management as per best project management practices. This will then help in achieving ULO1, this in
turn will help you in achieving CLO-1 and CLo-2
The quiz will be completed in class.
Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 10 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit
mark.
Page | 3
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 2: Case Study
| Due date: | Week 6 |
| Group/individual: | Individual |
| Word count / Time provided: | 2500 words |
| Weighting: | 30% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3 |
| Course Learning Outcomes: | CLO1 CLO2, CLO5, CLO7, CLO9 |
| Graduate Attributes: | GA2, GA7, GA11 |
Assessment Details:
The assignment is designed as an imaginary case study for students to practice procurement and risk
management concepts.
The individual assignment has the following major deliverables:
1. Select a project at your target company
2. Provide background of the case project
3. Recommend the best project delivery method for your project based on the criteria that YOU think
is most crucial to this project. Be mindful that the types of delivery methods that need to be evaluated
are Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build and CM@Risk. You must document all your assumptions and
rationale for the selection of the project delivery system. All yours suggested grading (the criteria,
weights, and scores) should come with justifications and explain why you gave such grade to each
element of the selection matrix.
4. Evaluate and recommend the best financial contract type for your project based on the criteria that
YOU think are crucial to this project. The types of contract that need to be evaluated are Lump sum
contract, Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract and Cost-Plus Fixed Fee Contract. All grading must be
justified and explained.
5. Evaluate and recommend the best procurement method for your project based on the criteria that
are crucial to this project. The types of procurement that need to be evaluated are Competitive,
Negotiated and Best Value. All grading must be justified and explained.
6. Develop Risk Management Plan including Risk Register, Risk Quadrant Analysis, and risk mitigation
plan
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30%
of the total unit mark
| Marking Criteria | Fail | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High Distinction |
| Demonstrate a critical understanding of project management processes including contracting, |
Inadequate understanding of project management processes including contracting, |
Basic knowledge only of project management processes including |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of project management processes |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of |
Page | 4
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
| tendering, leasing, and procurement (45 marks) |
tendering, leasing, and procurement; cannot discuss concepts in own words |
contracting , tendering, leasing, and procurement; limited depth of basic concepts |
including contracting, tendering, leasing, and procurement |
understanding of project management processes including contracting , tendering, leasing, and procurement |
project management processes including contracting, tendering, leasing, and procurement |
| Identify and critically assess the risks associated with projects (35 marks) |
Inadequate understanding of the risks associated with projects; cannot discuss concepts in own words |
Basic knowledge only of the risks associate d with projects; limited depth of basic concepts |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of the risks associated with projects |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of the risks associated with projects |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of the risks associated with projects |
| Writing and Presentation (15 marks) – Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline |
Inadequate Writing and Presentation skills |
Basic Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits breadth and depth Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of Writing and Presentation skills |
Displays Exceptional Writing and Presentation skills |
| Referencing (5 marks) – Comprehensive Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using HARVARD guidelines |
Inadequate understanding of Referencing |
Basic knowledge only of Referencing |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Displays Exceptional understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Page | 5
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 3: Report and Presentation
| Due date: | Week 10 |
| Group/individual: | Individual |
| Word count / Time provided: | 2000 words and 12 slides |
| Weighting: | 20% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4 |
| Course Learning Outcomes: | CLO-1, CLO-2, CLO-5, CLO-7, CLO-8, CLO-9 |
| Graduate Attributes: | GA2, GA7, GA8, GA11 |
Assessment Details:
The Project is meant to help you apply what you learn in the course to a project that you will evaluate.
You should identify a case project. You should choose any professional project (not personal, like
planning a wedding) to study. This project may be at your current place of work, but it cannot be one
where the company already has PM documents developed (this relies on your academic integrity).
NOTE: Spelling, grammar, and punctuation ALWAYS count!!
Instructions:
Here are the deliverables that you will need to produce:
1. Select a project at your target company
2. Provide background of the case project
3. Develop Quality Management Plan including at least 5 total metrics (qualitative and/or
quantitative)
4. Develop Stakeholder Management Plan including conflict management plan.
In conjunction with the report detailed above, there is a second deliverable for the
Project plan exercise. The students are required to present and defend to their client (course
lecturer, or a guest lecturer) their project plan.
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20%
of the total unit mark
| Marking Criteria | Fail | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High Distinction |
| Describe and discuss relevant quality standards and their role in effective project management (40 marks) |
Inadequate understanding of relevant quality standards and their role in effective project |
Basic knowledge only of relevant quality standards and their role in effective |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of relevant quality standards and their role in |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of relevant quality |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of relevant quality |
Page | 6
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
| management ; cannot discuss concepts in own words |
project management; limited depth of basic concepts |
effective project management |
standards and their role in effective project management |
standards and their role in effective project management |
|
| Demonstrate an understanding of conflict management practices and their role in addressing project management challenges (40 marks) |
Inadequate understanding of conflict management practices and their role in addressing project management challenges; cannot discuss concepts in own words |
Basic knowledge only of conflict management practices and their role in addressing project management challenges; limited depth of basic concepts |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of conflict management practices and their role in addressing project management challenges |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of conflict management practices and their role in addressing project management challenges |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of conflict management practices and their role in addressing project management challenges |
| Writing and Presentation (15 marks) – Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline |
Inadequate Writing and Presentation skills |
Basic Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits breadth and depth Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of Writing and Presentation skills |
Displays Exceptional Writing and Presentation skills |
| Referencing (5 marks) – Comprehensive Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using HARVARD guidelines |
Inadequate understanding of Referencing |
Basic knowledge only of Referencing |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Displays Exceptional understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Page | 7
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 4: Scenario Analysis
| Due date: | Week 12 |
| Group/individual: | Individual |
| Word count / Time provided: | 2000 words |
| Weighting: | 30% |
| Unit Learning Outcomes: | ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4 |
| Course Learning Outcomes: | CLO-1, CLO-7, CLO-8, CLO9 |
| Graduate Attributes: |
Answer all questions in the following scenarios and write your answers in a report.
Q1 You are the project manager responsible for the overall construction of a
new international airport in Western Sydney.
a. Identify the major groups of Stakeholders that are likely to affect the
success of this project. (You need to provide a comprehensive list)
b. Group the identified stakeholders in terms of internal and external
stakeholders and provide the power-interest matrix
c. Develop a quality management plan showing 3 quality management
tools that you will use with justifications
d. Develop a procument management plan where you will choose a
contract type and delivery system with justification
40 MARKS
10 MARKS
10 MARKS
10 MARKS
10 MARKS
Q2 The Youth Rugby project team has identified the following potential risks to
their project:
a. Referees failing to show up at designated games
b. Fighting between teams
c. Pivotal error committed by a referee that determines the outcome of
a game
d. Abusive behavior along the sidelines by parents
e. Inadequate parking
f. Not enough teams sign up for different age brackets
g. Serious injury
How would you recommend that they respond (i.e. avoid, accept …) to these
risks and why?
30 MARKS
Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Q3 Saint Pedro Health Centre is considering opening a new health clinic in the university
village. It has three different models, each with a different service capacity. The health
center estimates that the average number of customers per hour will be 100, 120, or 140.
You are acting as a consultant to Saint Pedro Health Centre to advise on selecting the
best model for its venture. Which model you suggest them to choose based on EMV?
The payoff table for the new health clinic is given in the following table.
| Probability 100 (40%) 120 (20%) 140 (40%) | |||
| Model I | $10,000 | $15,000 | $14,000 |
| Model II | $8,000 | $18,000 | $12,000 |
| Model III | $6,000 | $16,000 | $21,000 |
30 MARKS
Marking Information: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the
total unit mark.
| Marking Criteria |
Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) |
Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark |
Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark |
Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark |
Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark |
| Q1- Concise and complete answer displaying sufficient knowledge and understanding with relevant information to the question in context. (32 marks) |
Inadequate understanding of relevant information to the question in context. |
Basic knowledge only of relevant information to the question in context. |
Exhibits breadth and depth of relevant information to the question in context. |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of relevant information to the question in context. |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of relevant information to the question in context. |
| Q1- Writing and Presentation (5 marks) – Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; |
Inadequate Writing and Presentation skills |
Basic Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits breadth and depth Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of Writing and Presentation skills |
Displays Exceptional Writing and Presentation skills |
Page | 9
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
| applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub-headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline |
|||||
| Q1- Referencing (3 marks) – Comprehensive Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using Harvard guidelines |
Inadequate understanding of Referencing |
Basic knowledge only of Referencing |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Displays Exceptional understanding of developing and using Referencing |
| Q2- Concise and complete answer displaying sufficient knowledge and understanding with relevant information to the question in context. (24 marks) |
Inadequate understanding of relevant information to the question in context. |
Basic knowledge only of relevant information to the question in context. |
Exhibits breadth and depth of relevant information to the question in context. |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of relevant information to the question in context. |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of relevant information to the question in context. |
| Q2- Writing and Presentation (4 marks) – Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub-headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline |
Inadequate Writing and Presentation skills |
Basic Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits breadth and depth Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of Writing and Presentation skills |
Displays Exceptional Writing and Presentation skills |
Page | 10
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
| Q2- Referencing (2 marks) – Comprehensive Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using Harvard guidelines |
Inadequate understanding of Referencing |
Basic knowledge only of Referencing |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Displays Exceptional understanding of developing and using Referencing |
| Q3- Concise and complete answer displaying sufficient knowledge and understanding with relevant information to the question in context. (24 marks) |
Inadequate understanding of relevant information to the question in context. |
Basic knowledge only of relevant information to the question in context. |
Exhibits breadth and depth of relevant information to the question in context. |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of relevant information to the question in context. |
Displays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of relevant information to the question in context. |
| Q3- Writing and Presentation (4 marks) – Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub-headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline |
Inadequate Writing and Presentation skills |
Basic Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits breadth and depth Writing and Presentation skills |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of Writing and Presentation skills |
Displays Exceptional Writing and Presentation skills |
| Q3- Referencing (2 marks) – Comprehensive Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using Harvard guidelines |
Inadequate understanding of Referencing |
Basic knowledge only of Referencing |
Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Exhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of developing and using Referencing |
Displays Exceptional understanding of developing and using Referencing |
The post SBM3302 Project Execution Planning and Management appeared first on My Assignment Online.