| Criterion | % | HighDistinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
| Demonstratesan understandingof the problem and the background |
10% | Outstanding introduction to the problem and why there was a need for a solution;previous solutions for this problem identified with a clear explanation of their success/failures |
Sound introduction to the problem and why there was a need for a solution;identified previous solution for this problem with their success/failures |
The problem is introduced and why there is a need for a solution but there is limited mention of previoustreatments |
Brief introduction to the problem with no mention of previous solution |
No introduction to the problem or mention of previous solutions to solve this problem |
| Description of a detailed solution to the problem |
30% | Well defined, relevant and innovative solution to the problem is described with excellent detail and is clear in purpose with benefitsdescribed |
Relevant and innovative solution to the problem is defined and well described and benefits identified |
Solution to the problem is identified with limited details or the solution is not relevant or innovative |
Solution to the problem is identified with no details offered and is not relevant or innovative |
No solution to the problem are identified |
| Demonstrationof the proof of concept |
40% | Proof of concept is relevant to the solution and extremely well described with clear milestones identified and go/no go points clearly defined |
Proof of concept is relevant to the solution and well described and milestones identified and go/no go points defined |
Proof of concept is somewhat relevant to the solution and describedand/or milestones and go/no go points not clearly identified |
Proof of concept is not relevant to the solution and describedand/or milestones and go/no go points not clearly identified |
No demonstration of a proof of concept for the identified solution |
| Presentation of ideas using language of science |
10% | Outstanding use of language,including technicallanguage; cohesive voice throughout; no errors in grammar or spelling. |
Sound use of language,including technicallanguage; cohesive voice throughout;minor errors in grammar or spelling. |
Some use of technical language; report is cohesive in some areas, lacking in others; few errors in grammar or spelling. |
Some use of technical language; report lacks a cohesive voice throughout;some errors in grammar or spelling. |
Lacking use of technicallanguage; report lacks a cohesive voice throughout; numerous errors in grammar or spelling. |
| Use of relevant scholarly references |
10% | Appropriate use of high quality and relevant references to support your background/solution; referencing follows UTS Harvard guidelines; citation of 8-10 relevant sources. |
Appropriate use of references that are of high quality and are relevant; referencing follows UTS Harvard referencing guidelines; citation of 5-8 relevant sources. |
References are of good quality and are relevant; referencing follows UTS Harvard referencing guidelines; citation of <5 relevant sources. |
References are sparse; referencingformat does not follow UTS Harvardguidelines exactly; <5 relevant sources cited. |
No referencing (in text or reference list). |
ASSESSMENT
TASK 1B
MARKINGRUBRIC
60904 Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Commercialisation| University of Technology, Sydney
The post Demonstratesan understandingof the problem appeared first on My Assignment Online.
