MGMT20132_2201: Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection 9/5/20, 2(25 pm
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=1119218 Page 1 of 3
Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection
Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection
New due date: Week 12, Friday 5 June 2020 11:45 PM AEST
Weighting: 50%
Length: 2000 words
Please note that academic misconduct and late submission penalties will apply to this assessment as per the university policies and
procedures.
Assessment Overview
This assessment must be completed by students individually. This assessment builds on the novel value proposition developed for an
existing business or organisation in assessment 1. Adjustments to the novel value proposition can be made based on assessment 1 reflection
and feedback. The assessment is designed for students to develop innovation insight and practices by developing a novel business
proposition for an existing business or organisation and aligned with the strategic trajectory of the business or organisation. The assessment
is also designed for students to self-reflect on their own innovation capabilities and practices. The assessment involves writing a 2000-word
report for a novel business proposition within an existing business or organisation. Assessment details and guidance will be provided on the
unit website in Moodle and in class.
You are strongly encouraged to discuss your assessment ideas and suggestions in class with fellow students and your local lecturer before
you complete and submit the assessment.
Assessment Guidance
Further assessment guidance will be provided here. As we progress in the unit, the unit coordinator will add advice here in response to
student questions and discussions. You are encouraged to ask questions and contribute to discussions in class and to create posts on the
website discussion forum. Feel free to discuss your assessment ideas in the unit discussion forum, before you complete and submit the
assessment.
Assessment 2 – List of tools and techniques (link)
Assessment 2 – student guide (link).
Assessment 2 – Report format (link)
Assessment Task
You are required to write a 2000-word report for a novel business proposal you have developed. The business proposal must build upon your
novel value proposition developed in assessment 1 for the existing business or organisation selected in assessment 1. You must use
appropriate headings to structure the body of the report.
Your report must demonstrate:
K. Logical and persuasive articulation of: business model description; value proposition development; business operations development;
supply chain development; competitive advantage; financial value capture and strategic fit (this includes elements 5 to 10 in the
disciplined entrepreneurship canvas and elements 3 to 9 in the business model canvas). 40%
S. Logical and persuasive argumentation in regard to how assumptions and uncertainties related to: customer desirability; technical
feasibility; and financial viability have been addressed to date and how they will be addressed in the future as described in a phased
Dashboard / My units / 2020 Term 1 / MGMT20132_2201 / Assessment 2 details, guidance and submission
/ Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection
MGMT20132_2201: Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection 9/5/20, 2(25 pm
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=1119218 Page 2 of 3
feasibility; and financial viability have been addressed to date and how they will be addressed in the future as described in a phased
development plan. 16%
Z. Logical and persuasive argumentation for the selection of the innovation tools and techniques used to support the report findings and
recommendations. These must be beyond the tools and techniques used in assessment 1. Minimum five (5) additional tools and
techniques must be selected from the provided list of tools and techniques. 6%
[. Logical and persuasive application of the selected innovation tools and techniques used to support the report findings and
recommendations. These must be different to the tools and techniques used in assessment 1. Minimum five (5) additional tools and
techniques must be applied from the provided list of tools and techniques. 8%
]. Candid and critical self-reflection about assessment 2 tasks including: a reflection on the development of personal innovation
capabilities and practices; identification of own personal strengths and weaknesses; supported with suggestions for self-improvement.
10%
_. Clear flow of thought throughout the report with: a convincing executive summary; clear and succinct purpose described in the
introduction; relevant structure and content within the body of the report; and a clear and succinct conclusion. 6%
`. Critical review skills and integration of relevant academic and professional literature. A minimum of ten (10) academic and professional
references must be used. 4%
a. Appropriate in-text referencing and reference list. Adherence to CQUniversity APA reference style. 4%
d. Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling. Appropriate report format with good use of bullet points, illustrations and figures. Within
±10% of the word limit for report, excluding references and appendices: 2000 words. 6%
Assessment References
Aulet, B. (2017). Disciplined entrepreneurship workbook. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Assessment Criteria
Your report will be assessed according to the following criteria.
Your report must demonstrate:
K. Logical and persuasive articulation of: business model description; value proposition development; business operations development;
supply chain development; competitive advantage; financial value capture and strategic fit (this includes elements 5 to 10 in the
disciplined entrepreneurship canvas and elements 3 to 9 in the business model canvas). 40%
S. Logical and persuasive argumentation in regard to how assumptions and uncertainties related to: customer desirability; technical
feasibility; and financial viability have been addressed to date and how they will be addressed in the future as described in a phased
development plan. 16%
Z. Logical and persuasive argumentation for the selection of the innovation tools and techniques used to support the report findings and
recommendations. These must be beyond the tools and techniques used in assessment 1. Minimum five (5) additional tools and
techniques must be selected from the provided list of tools and techniques. 6%
[. Logical and persuasive application of the selected innovation tools and techniques used to support the report findings and
recommendations. These must be different to the tools and techniques used in assessment 1. Minimum five (5) additional tools and
techniques must be applied from the provided list of tools and techniques. 8%
]. Candid and critical self-reflection about assessment 2 tasks including: a reflection on the development of personal innovation
capabilities and practices; identification of own personal strengths and weaknesses; supported with suggestions for self-improvement.
10%
_. Clear flow of thought throughout the report with: a convincing executive summary; clear and succinct purpose described in the
introduction; relevant structure and content within the body of the report; and a clear and succinct conclusion. 6%
`. Critical review skills and integration of relevant academic and professional literature. A minimum of ten (10) academic and professional
references must be used. 4%
a. Appropriate in-text referencing and reference list. Adherence to CQUniversity APA reference style. 4%
d. Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling. Appropriate report format with good use of bullet points, illustrations and figures. Within
±10% of the word limit for report, excluding references and appendices: 2000 words. 6%
Assessment 2 – Marking rubric (PDF link)
Assessment Submission
Submit your report with a cover sheet showing: unit number and name, assessment number, business name, your name and student number.
The assessment submission must be a Word file (.doc or .docx).
The assessment submission must be made here.
MGMT20132_2201: Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection 9/5/20, 2(25 pm
https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/assign/view.php?id=1119218 Page 3 of 3
CQUniversity Australia acknowledges the traditional owners of the land upon which we stand.
Copyright | Disclaimer | Accessibility | Policy | Privacy | Right to Information | ASQA VET Quality Framework | CRICOS Provider Code: 00219c
| ASQA National Provider Number 40939 |
You are logged in as Prasannakumar Yendluri (Log out)
MGMT20132_2201
Submission status
Submission
status
No attempt
Grading status Not marked
Due date Friday, 5 June 2020, 11r45 PM
Time remaining 27 days 9 hours
Last modified –
Submission
comments ! Comments (0)
Add submission
You have not made a submission yet.
Suggested readings: Innovation,
technology and science (hyperlinked) Jump to… Assessment 2 – Marking rubric (PDF) 
︎
The post MGMT20132_2201: Assessment 2 – Novel business proposition and self-reflection appeared first on EssayBishop.