Assessment task 3– Case Analysis Health & society
| Weighting | Criterion | High Distinction (100%-85%) | Distinction (84%-75%) | Credit (74%-65%) | Pass (64%-50%) | Fail (49%-0%) | Mark |
|
10% |
Overview of relevant information in the case study SLO – C, D | Clear, concise, well-articulated overview of relevant information of the case study. No more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 10 – 8.5 marks |
Clear overview of relevant information in the case study. No more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 8– 7.5 marks |
An overview of the case study is provided. No more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 7– 6.5 marks |
The basic information of the case study is presented. Some grammatical or vocabulary errors, that may at times affect clarity (level 2 writing) 6 – 5 marks |
There is no clear overview of the case study. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary, that affect clarity (level 1 writing) 4.9 – 0 marks |
|
|
15% |
Brief description of the social determinants of health and whythey are significant to patient care and outcomes. Supported by evidenced based literature. SLO – B, D |
Clear, concise and specific description of the SDH and whythey are significant to patient care and outcomes. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. Correct use of APA 7th referencing and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 15 – 13 marks |
Clear and relevantdescription of the SDH and whythey are significant to patient care and outcomes. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. Correct use of APA 7threferencing and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 12.5 – 11.5 marks |
Clear description of the SDH and whythey are significant to patient care and outcomes. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. May be some minor APA 7threferencing errors and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 11 – 10 marks |
Brief description of the SDH and whythey are significant to patient care and outcomes. Supporting literature is limited in scope and/or there are some errors in referencing conventions. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors, that may at times affect clarity (level 2 writing) 9.5 – 7.5 marks |
Uncleardescription of the SDH and whythey are significant to patient care and outcomes. Not adequately supported with evidence-based literatureand/or there are many referencing errors and/or some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary, that affect clarity (level 1 writing) 7 – 0 marks |
|
|
30% |
Description of how issues arising from the case study relate to the three designated social determinants of health Supported by literature. SLO – B, C, D | Clear, concise and specific description of how issues arising from the case study relate to the three designated social determinants of health. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. Correct use of APA 7th referencing and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 30 –25.5 marks |
Clear and relevant description of how issues arising from the case study relate to the three designated social determinants of health. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. Correct use of APA 7threferencing and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 25 – 22.5 marks |
Clear description of how issues arising from the case study relate to three social determinants of health. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. May be some minor APA 7threferencing errors and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 22 – 19.5 marks |
Brief description of how issues arising from the case study relate to social determinants of health. Supporting literature is limited in scope and/or there are some errors in referencing conventions. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors, that may at times affect clarity (level 2 writing) 19 – 15 marks |
Unclear description of how issues arising from the case study relate to three social determinants of health. Not adequately supportedwith evidence-based literatureand/or there are many referencing errors and/or some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary, that affect clarity (level 1 writing) 14.5 – 0 marks |
|
|
45% |
Provides 3 (1 for each SDH) recommendations to address identified issues for this patient to enhance patient outcomes. Supported by literature. SLO A, C, D | Clear, concise and specific set of 3 recommendations to address identified issues for this patient to enhance patient outcomes. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. Correct use of APA 7th referencing and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 45 – 38 marks |
Clear and relevantset of 3 recommendations to address identified issues for this patient to enhance patient outcomes. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. Correct use of APA 7threferencing and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 37.5 – 33 marks |
Clearset of 3 recommendations to address identified issues for this patient to enhance patient outcomes. Supporting literature is relevant and from a variety of sources. May be some minor APA 7threferencing errors and no more than a few grammatical or vocabulary errors but these do not affect clarity (level 3 writing) 32.5 – 29 marks |
Brief and generalised recommendations are provided to address identified issues for this patient to enhance patient outcomes. Supporting literature is limited in scope and/or there are some errors in referencing conventions. There are some grammatical or vocabulary errors, that may at times affect clarity (level 2 writing) 28.5 – 22.50 marks |
There are less than 3 recommendations and it is not clear how they link to the identified issues for this patient nor to how they might enhance the patient outcomes. Not adequately supported with evidence-based literatureand/or there are many referencing errors and/or some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary, that affect clarity (level 1 writing) 22 – 0 marks |
The post Assessment task 3– Case Analysis Health & society appeared first on My Assignment Online.
Plagiarism Free Assignment Help
Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms
✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers
✓ Deadline from 3 hours
✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included
✓ Unlimited free revisions
✓ Free to submit — compare quotes