Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now

Assignment requirements: As a group, you are required to analyse the project requirement and then design and simulate a network fulfilling the above mentioned requirement. You need to provide a fully functional simulation model for the network. The report should have a detailed explanation of the planning and designing of network. It is recommended that bullet points are included whenever necessary. The sections that you need to consider in you report are as follows:


 

 

 

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Unit Code

 

MN503

Unit Title

 

Overview of Internetworking

Assessment Type

Group (3 students in a Group)

Assessment Title

Network requirement analysis and plan

Purpose  of

the

This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the

assessment

(with

following learning outcomes:

ULO Mapping)

 

d.  Analyse and report on the current and future state of the internetworking

 

 

 

 

 

 

infrastructure and its applications.

 

 

 

e.  Implement a process to support the administration and management of

 

 

 

internetworking.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weight

 

30% of the total assessments

Total Marks

 

70+30=100

 

 

 

 

 

 

Word limit

 

1500 -2000 (approximately 6-8 pages)

Due Date

 

2nd, June 2020 Week 11 (Submit report on Moodle)

 

 

Demonstration of the design and simulation model in week 11 during Lab. timings.

Submission

 

•  All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page.

Guidelines

 

•  The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font

 

 

and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section

 

 

headings.

 

 

•  Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately

 

 

at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.

Extension

 

•  If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration

 

 

 

Application must be submitted directly to the School’s Administration Officer, in

 

 

 

Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application

 

 

 

three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information

 

 

 

is available at:  http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy

 

 

 

 

 

Academic

 

•  Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the

Misconduct

 

 

case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from

 

 

 

the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar

 

 

 

with the full policy and procedure available at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-

 

 

 

 

guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020

MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e  | 2

 Assignment Description

 Project Scope: A typical network layout diagram of a higher education Institute is given as Figure-1 (for illustrative purposes only). The Institute has sections segregated as Melbourne and Sydney campuses connected through WAN. Within the campuses, we have laboratories and other office workstations segregated into School of IT and School of Business.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure-1: Network layout of the Higher Education Institute

 

The Network requirements are given as follows:

 

1. Two campuses have separate local area networks. Staff users from both campuses should be able to have access from/to both campuses.

 

2. There should be a clear restriction that any host from library should not be allowed to ping hosts from other offices.

3. Printing services should be available to all the schools’ users.

4. Wireless access is available to all the staff, student, and guest across both campuses.

 

5. Internet should be provided to all the sections (i.e. School of IT and School of business from both campuses).

 

6. IP network design is required.

 

7. Hardware requirements with costs specification (specification of all the hardware required, number of units and per unit cost).

8. Configuration details on the hardware (Routers, switches and workstations).

 

Assignment requirements: As a group, you are required to analyse the project requirement and then design and simulate a network fulfilling the above mentioned requirement. You need to provide a fully functional simulation model for the network. The report should have a detailed explanation of the planning and designing of network. It is recommended that bullet points are included whenever necessary. The sections that you need to consider in you report are as follows:

 

1. Project Scope

2. Project requirements

3. Network design – Consider the human factor design concepts

 

•  This part should include LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used.

 

4. IP addressing in a tabular form (include justification whenever necessary)

 

 

Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020

 

MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e  | 3

 

 

 

 

 

5. Network topology diagram and simulation (CISCO Packet tracer is mandatory)

 

• Switch configuration

 

• Router configuration

 

• Access point and server configuration guidelines

 

• Security configuration

 

 

Student should show the demo of the network design in Week 11 lab. Work progress and consultation will be done during week 9 and 10. Demonstration marks will be awarded in regards to the stage of the completion of the design

 

The format of the demonstration will be

a) An individual demo,

b) At least 3 viva voce questions related to the design, and

c) Demo and viva voce duration 5 – 7 minutes (at max). The following is to be covered.

 

• Demonstration of the network design simulation in CISCO Packet Tracer.

 

Note to the lab tutor: As per the need, the lab tutor can allocate 15 minutes in Week 9 and Week 10 for work progression check and consultation.

 

Marking criteria

The following marking criteria will be followed for the assignment report.

Section to be included in

Description of the section

Marks

the report

 

 

Introduction

Introduction of the project and overview of the

05

 

report

 

Project Scope

The project Scope should be explained in a logical

05

 

approach

 

Project requirements

Identify the project’s functional and non-functional

10

 

requirements

 

Network design

Explain the network design approach considering human

10

 

factor   (user-centric   design)   and   also   include

 

 

LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used.

 

Design Analysis

Provide an in-depth analysis of the proposed design and

10

 

strongly justify and support your design

 

IP addresses table

Write the table summarising IP address, subnet-netmask,

10

 

IP and address classes with appropriate justification.

 

Network Topology

This part includes host, switches, routers, DHCP, access

10

Diagram

points server configuration guidelines and security

 

 

configurations.

 

Conclusion

Write a clear and conclusive summary of the report

05

Reference Style

Follow IEEE reference style

05

 

TOTAL

70

 

 

 

 

 

Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020

 

MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e  | 4

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstration Marks

Section to be included in

Description of the section

Marks

the report

 

 

Simulation Completeness

All the elements are present requirement are met

20

Simulation execution

Simulation(s) executes satisfactorily

05

Question Answers

Student explains the design and complete process

05

 

Total

30

 

 

Assessment/marking Description

Marks for the assignment 2 will be calculated as follows:

 

Individual’s Total Marks= Report Marks + Individual’s demonstration marks

 

Example of the marking rubric for the Assignment: Total marks 60.

The details about the rubric are as follows:

 

 

 

Grades

 

 

Introduction/05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Scope/05

 

HD

 

80% and above

 

 

All the points are

 

pertinent and

 

covered in brief

 

and provide good

summary of the

 

literature and

 

activity

 

performed in the

 

assessment.

 

 

All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated

 

 

D

CR

70 – 79%

60 – 69%

Mostly points are

Many points are

pertinent and

pertinent and

covered in brief

covered in brief

and provide good

and provide

summary of the

summary of the

literature and

literature and

activity

activity

performed in the

performed in the

assessment.

assessment.

Topics relevant

Generally

and soundly

relevant and

analysed

analysed

 

 

 

P

 

50 – 59%

 

 

Few point are

 

pertinent and

 

covered in brief

 

and provide

outline of the

 

literature and

 

activity

 

performed in the

 

assessment.

 

 

Some relevance and briefly presented

Fail

 

<50%

 

 

Many points are not pertinent and not clear and summary is not provided for the activity.

 

 

 

 

Not relevant to the assignment topic

 

 

Project

 

requirements/10

 

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

 

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source material appropriately

 

Demonstrated an

Demonstrated an

Did not

average ability to

average ability to

demonstrate the

think critically

think critically but

ability to think

and sourced

did not sourced

critically and did

reference

reference

not sourced

material

material

reference

appropriately

appropriately

material

 

 

appropriately

 

 

Network design/10

 

 

 

 

 

Design Analysis/10

All elements are present and very well integrated

 

 

 

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically

Components present with good cohesion

 

 

 

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically

 

Components presented and mostly well integrated

 

 

Demonstrated ability to think critically and

Most

 

components

 

present and an

 

average

 

integration

 

 

Demonstrated ability to think critically and but

Lacks

 

components and

 

not integrated

 

well

 

 

Did not demonstrated ability to think

 

 

Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020

 

MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e  | 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IP addresses

 

table/10

 

and sourced

 

reference

materials

 

appropriately

 

 

All element are present, accurate description and excellent justification

 

 

and but did not

sourced

did not sourced

sourced

reference

reference

reference

materials

materials

materials

appropriately

appropriately

appropriately

 

 

Excellent

Good description

Good description

description and

and good

and good

good justification

justification

justification

 

 

 

 

critically and but did not sourced reference materials appropriately

 

 

Poor description and poor articulation

 

 

 

Network

 

Topology/10

 

Diagram

 

 

 

Conclusion/05

 

All elements are present and very well integrated

 

 

 

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

 

Components present with good cohesion

 

 

 

Consistent logic and convincing

Components

Most

presented and

components

mostly well

present and an

integrated

average

 

integration

Mostly consistent

Adequate

logic convincing

cohesion and

 

conviction

 

 

Proposal lacks appropriate structuring and integration

 

 

Arguments are confused and disjointed

 

 

 

Reference Style/05

 

 

 

 

Demonstration/30

Clear styles with an excellent source of references

 

 

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments and appropriate justification

Clear referencing

Generally good

Sometimes clear

style

referencing style

referencing style

 

 

 

Consistent logic

Mostly consistent

Adequate

and convincing

logic convincing

cohesion and

logic and

relevant

conviction

justification

justification

 

 

 

 

 

Lacks consistency with many errors

 

 

 

The argument is confused and disjointed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

Native UK, USA & Australia writers Deadline from 3 hours 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included Unlimited free revisions Free to submit — compare quotes
Scroll to Top