|
|
|
|
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines |
||||||
|
Unit Code |
|
MN503 |
|||||||
|
Unit Title |
|
Overview of Internetworking |
|||||||
|
Assessment Type |
Group (3 students in a Group) |
||||||||
|
Assessment Title |
Network requirement analysis and plan |
||||||||
|
Purpose of |
the |
This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the |
|||||||
|
assessment |
(with |
following learning outcomes: |
|||||||
|
ULO Mapping) |
|
d. Analyse and report on the current and future state of the internetworking |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
infrastructure and its applications. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
e. Implement a process to support the administration and management of |
||||||
|
|
|
|
internetworking. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
|
30% of the total assessments |
|||||||
|
Total Marks |
|
70+30=100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word limit |
|
1500 -2000 (approximately 6-8 pages) |
|||||||
|
Due Date |
|
2nd, June 2020 Week 11 (Submit report on Moodle) |
|||||||
|
|
|
Demonstration of the design and simulation model in week 11 during Lab. timings. |
|||||||
|
Submission |
|
• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page. |
|||||||
|
Guidelines |
|
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font |
|||||||
|
|
|
and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section |
|||||||
|
|
|
headings. |
|||||||
|
|
|
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately |
|||||||
|
|
|
at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. |
|||||||
|
Extension |
|
• If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Application must be submitted directly to the School’s Administration Officer, in |
||||||
|
|
|
|
Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application |
||||||
|
|
|
|
three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information |
||||||
|
|
|
|
is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Academic |
|
• Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the |
|||||||
|
Misconduct |
|
|
case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from |
||||||
|
|
|
|
the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar |
||||||
|
|
|
|
with the full policy and procedure available at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information, |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
||||||
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 2
Assignment Description
Project Scope: A typical network layout diagram of a higher education Institute is given as Figure-1 (for illustrative purposes only). The Institute has sections segregated as Melbourne and Sydney campuses connected through WAN. Within the campuses, we have laboratories and other office workstations segregated into School of IT and School of Business.
Figure-1: Network layout of the Higher Education Institute
The Network requirements are given as follows:
1. Two campuses have separate local area networks. Staff users from both campuses should be able to have access from/to both campuses.
2. There should be a clear restriction that any host from library should not be allowed to ping hosts from other offices.
3. Printing services should be available to all the schools’ users.
4. Wireless access is available to all the staff, student, and guest across both campuses.
5. Internet should be provided to all the sections (i.e. School of IT and School of business from both campuses).
6. IP network design is required.
7. Hardware requirements with costs specification (specification of all the hardware required, number of units and per unit cost).
8. Configuration details on the hardware (Routers, switches and workstations).
Assignment requirements: As a group, you are required to analyse the project requirement and then design and simulate a network fulfilling the above mentioned requirement. You need to provide a fully functional simulation model for the network. The report should have a detailed explanation of the planning and designing of network. It is recommended that bullet points are included whenever necessary. The sections that you need to consider in you report are as follows:
1. Project Scope
2. Project requirements
3. Network design – Consider the human factor design concepts
• This part should include LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used.
4. IP addressing in a tabular form (include justification whenever necessary)
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 3
5. Network topology diagram and simulation (CISCO Packet tracer is mandatory)
• Switch configuration
• Router configuration
• Access point and server configuration guidelines
• Security configuration
Student should show the demo of the network design in Week 11 lab. Work progress and consultation will be done during week 9 and 10. Demonstration marks will be awarded in regards to the stage of the completion of the design
The format of the demonstration will be
a) An individual demo,
b) At least 3 viva voce questions related to the design, and
c) Demo and viva voce duration 5 – 7 minutes (at max). The following is to be covered.
• Demonstration of the network design simulation in CISCO Packet Tracer.
Note to the lab tutor: As per the need, the lab tutor can allocate 15 minutes in Week 9 and Week 10 for work progression check and consultation.
Marking criteria
The following marking criteria will be followed for the assignment report.
|
Section to be included in |
Description of the section |
Marks |
|
the report |
|
|
|
Introduction |
Introduction of the project and overview of the |
05 |
|
|
report |
|
|
Project Scope |
The project Scope should be explained in a logical |
05 |
|
|
approach |
|
|
Project requirements |
Identify the project’s functional and non-functional |
10 |
|
|
requirements |
|
|
Network design |
Explain the network design approach considering human |
10 |
|
|
factor (user-centric design) and also include |
|
|
|
LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used. |
|
|
Design Analysis |
Provide an in-depth analysis of the proposed design and |
10 |
|
|
strongly justify and support your design |
|
|
IP addresses table |
Write the table summarising IP address, subnet-netmask, |
10 |
|
|
IP and address classes with appropriate justification. |
|
|
Network Topology |
This part includes host, switches, routers, DHCP, access |
10 |
|
Diagram |
points server configuration guidelines and security |
|
|
|
configurations. |
|
|
Conclusion |
Write a clear and conclusive summary of the report |
05 |
|
Reference Style |
Follow IEEE reference style |
05 |
|
|
TOTAL |
70 |
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 4
Demonstration Marks
|
Section to be included in |
Description of the section |
Marks |
|
the report |
|
|
|
Simulation Completeness |
All the elements are present requirement are met |
20 |
|
Simulation execution |
Simulation(s) executes satisfactorily |
05 |
|
Question Answers |
Student explains the design and complete process |
05 |
|
|
Total |
30 |
Assessment/marking Description
Marks for the assignment 2 will be calculated as follows:
Individual’s Total Marks= Report Marks + Individual’s demonstration marks
Example of the marking rubric for the Assignment: Total marks 60.
The details about the rubric are as follows:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Grades
![]()
![]()
![]()
Introduction/05
![]()
![]()
![]()
Project Scope/05
![]()
![]()
![]()
HD
80% and above
![]()
![]()
![]()
All the points are
pertinent and
covered in brief
and provide good
summary of the
literature and
activity
performed in the
assessment.
![]()
![]()
All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
D |
CR |
|
70 – 79% |
60 – 69% |
|
Mostly points are |
Many points are |
|
pertinent and |
pertinent and |
|
covered in brief |
covered in brief |
|
and provide good |
and provide |
|
summary of the |
summary of the |
|
literature and |
literature and |
|
activity |
activity |
|
performed in the |
performed in the |
|
assessment. |
assessment. |
|
Topics relevant |
Generally |
|
and soundly |
relevant and |
|
analysed |
analysed |
|
|
|
![]()
![]()
![]()
P
50 – 59%
![]()
![]()
![]()
Few point are
pertinent and
covered in brief
and provide
outline of the
literature and
activity
performed in the
assessment.
Some relevance and briefly presented
Fail
<50%
![]()
![]()
![]()
Many points are not pertinent and not clear and summary is not provided for the activity.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not relevant to the assignment topic
Project
requirements/10
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source material appropriately
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Demonstrated an |
Demonstrated an |
Did not |
|
average ability to |
average ability to |
demonstrate the |
|
think critically |
think critically but |
ability to think |
|
and sourced |
did not sourced |
critically and did |
|
reference |
reference |
not sourced |
|
material |
material |
reference |
|
appropriately |
appropriately |
material |
|
|
|
appropriately |
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Network design/10
![]()
![]()
![]()
Design Analysis/10
All elements are present and very well integrated
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically
Components present with good cohesion
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically
Components presented and mostly well integrated
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstrated ability to think critically and
Most
components
present and an
average
integration
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstrated ability to think critically and but
Lacks
components and
not integrated
well
![]()
![]()
![]()
Did not demonstrated ability to think
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
IP addresses
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
table/10
![]()
![]()
![]()
and sourced
reference
materials
appropriately
![]()
![]()
![]()
All element are present, accurate description and excellent justification
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
and but did not |
sourced |
did not sourced |
|
sourced |
reference |
reference |
|
reference |
materials |
materials |
|
materials |
appropriately |
appropriately |
|
appropriately |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good description |
Good description |
|
description and |
and good |
and good |
|
good justification |
justification |
justification |
|
|
|
|
![]()
![]()
![]()
critically and but did not sourced reference materials appropriately
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Poor description and poor articulation
![]()
![]()
![]()
Network
Topology/10
Diagram
![]()
![]()
![]()
Conclusion/05
![]()
![]()
![]()
All elements are present and very well integrated
![]()
![]()
![]()
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments
![]()
![]()
![]()
Components present with good cohesion
![]()
![]()
![]()
Consistent logic and convincing
|
Components |
Most |
|
presented and |
components |
|
mostly well |
present and an |
|
integrated |
average |
|
|
integration |
|
Mostly consistent |
Adequate |
|
logic convincing |
cohesion and |
|
|
conviction |
|
|
|
Proposal lacks appropriate structuring and integration
![]()
![]()
![]()
Arguments are confused and disjointed
![]()
![]()
![]()
Reference Style/05
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demonstration/30
Clear styles with an excellent source of references
![]()
![]()
![]()
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments and appropriate justification
|
Clear referencing |
Generally good |
Sometimes clear |
|
style |
referencing style |
referencing style |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent logic |
Mostly consistent |
Adequate |
|
and convincing |
logic convincing |
cohesion and |
|
logic and |
relevant |
conviction |
|
justification |
justification |
|
|
|
|
|
Lacks consistency with many errors
![]()
![]()
![]()
The argument is confused and disjointed
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020