Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now

Assignment 2 covers Module 4

Assignment 2

Description Marks out of Wtg (%) Due date
Assignment 2 300 30 21/05/2020

Assignment 2 covers Module 4 L

Module 4 Ecology, land degradation and the conservation of resources (30%)

Aim of Assignment 2

To give you an opportunity to demonstrate that you can describe the inter-relationships between geology, geomorphology, water, soils, vegetation and fauna resources (Objective 2)

To enable you to demonstrate an understanding of land degradation issues and conservation practices (Objective 4)

Background to assignment

In this assignment, we shall investigate either a single development project, or alternatively a strategic vision for an area. Either one of those can be deemed to have impact on matters of national environmental significance (as opposed to Assignment 1, where we looked only at projects that had a state impact). Hence, different sets of legislation come into play, with different processes.

A significant impact is an impact which is important, notable, or of consequence, having regard to its context or intensity. Whether or not an action is likely to have a significant impact depends upon the sensitivity, value, and quality of the environment which is impacted, and upon the intensity, duration, magnitude and geographic extent of the impacts. You should consider all these factors when determining whether an action is likely to have a significant impact on the environment.

Under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999, environmental assessments are undertaken to enable environment and biodiversity conservation. There are nine matters of national environmental significance identified under the EPBC Act:

  • world heritage properties
  • national heritage places
  • wetlands of international importance (listed under the Ramsar Convention)
  • listed threatened species and ecological communities
  • migratory species protected under international agreements
  • Commonwealth marine areas
  • the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
  • nuclear actions (including uranium mines)
  • a water resource, in relation to coal seam gas development and large coal mining development

These types of projects require separate approval by the Australian Government. Your main resource for this assignment will hence be the website of the Australian Department of Environment and Energy (DEE). In addition, you will have to research beyond this website to supplement your knowledge on the topics of ecology, land degradation and conservation of resources.

For this assignment, you may select any project under the Key assessments tab or the Strategic assessments tab on the DEE website.

  • The key assessments contain a list of projects that are significant individual projects which are assessed project-by-project (See Figure 1).

Figure 1 List of Key assessments

  • The strategic assessments deal with where strategic assessments should occur in the years ahead. They are landscape scale assessments and can consider a much broader set of actions, for example a large urban growth area that will be developed over many years. Examples of potential strategic assessments could include:
    • regional-scale development plans and policies
    • large-scale housing development and associated infrastructure
    • fire, vegetation/resource or pest management policies plans or programs
    • infrastructure plans and policies
    • industry sector policies

The website lists many strategic assessments underway in the different states and territories. Select one assessment project that is not focused solely on water or air quality (for example the Lower Hunter assessment project for NSW. Under the Lower Hunter option, you will find individual research projects which address key information gaps). You are expected to narrow down the scope of the strategic assessment that you selected so that it fits in with the requirements of this assignment.

Details of assignment

Part A Report (270 marks)

Write a 2500-2800 word professional report containing the following sections.

  • Title page
  • Table of contents
  • List of figures
  • List of tables
  • Executive summary

Your report should contain the following sections

  • Introduction
    • The introduction of your project (extract brief details from the website)
    • What the aim of your report is
    • How the report is structured (signposting)
  • Body of report
    • Outline the biophysical attributes (e.g. climate, geology, soils, vegetation, water, fauna resources) of your chosen area/project.
      • Also introduce your project as an ecosystem, against a holistic view of ecosystems. Describe the energy flows encountered in your ecosystems and ecological successions.
      • If you choose a Strategic assessment, you have to select a section of that area to narrow down your scope. Include any attributes that are affected by the strategic vision for the area or the individual significant development project.
      • Where appropriate, include maps, aerial images, photographs or other illustrations of the various attributes.
    • Identify any major degradation issues that have arisen, or could be expected to arise, from the development, or from the strategic vision for the area.
      • In your answer, explain the processes that have led/may lead to your identified degradation issue (e.g. building a dam has reduced flooding, but changed the nature of the waterway, hence reducing the fish populations, and also the fertility of the surrounding soils due to smaller deposits of fertile sediments).
    • Propose your own strategies to mitigate or reduce the degradation issues identified above (not those stated in the website report).
      • These strategies should address the fundamental causes of the degradation but also should be practical with respect to technology, economics and societal preferences.
      • If you are discussing a proposed development, you may like to briefly suggest alternative proposals for the actual development.
      • This section is intended to get you to research on innovative ways to mitigate degradation.
  • Conclusion
    • In the concluding section, make a value judgement of the major environmental impacts of the individual project or the strategic intent for your area. Make recommendations on what conservation agreements might be put into place to mitigate those impacts.
  • Reference list (not included in word count)
    • Note. Also ensure that there are adequate and correct citations and captions throughout your report.
Part B Reflection (30 marks)

Write a professional reflection of 270-330 words on the assignment and your execution thereof.

  • Please note that a reflection is not a conclusion, and your reflection should hence not make concluding remarks to any of the parts of the assignment. What is expected is a reflection on how your skills, attitude, and knowledge have been impacted by completing this assessment item.
  • You should also clearly state any strategies that you intend to put into place to mitigate any areas that you had trouble with during the execution of the assessment.
  • Please also refer to any feedback that you got from the markers of Assignment 1, and how you have acted upon that to improve your completion of Assignment 2.

Submission format for Assignment 2

One PDF, consisting of the different sections in the following order

  • The marking rubric for Assignment 2
  • Your report
  • Your reflection
Notes on writing a report To successfully complete this assignment, you will have to compile and write a professional report to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the topics. To do this successfully, you will need to demonstrate the following skills: The ability to research a topic in a systematic manner reach a conclusion based upon the careful weighing of the available evidence organise material in a logical and concise manner to support an argument document evidence and sources of information. Your final report should demonstrate that you have thoroughly researched the issue and that you are able to communicate the research outcomes in a professional manner. The following notes on report writing should assist you in achieving this outcome. The process Good report preparation requires a process of careful reading of the sources, continual reflection upon the information, and constant referral to the question. The terms of the question should be clearly understood from the outset and kept constantly in mind so that all reading and note-taking is directed along useful lines of inquiry and towards the gathering of relevant information.

Your reading should move from the general text or source document to more specific articles. You should read, take notes, and make summaries of each writer’s key arguments, as well as making notes of any ideas and criticisms that occur to you. Take careful note of any phrases you wish to quote and note all sources in full. Your reflection should firstly involve teasing out the critical questions to be addressed, and secondly, the testing and refining of findings as the research proceeds. Be critical in your reading and listening and try to be aware of the value stance of the people involved. Some questions you should consider are: What are they saying, why are they saying that, and with what objectives in mind? Does a suggested solution appear to solve the issue or leave important parts unsolved? What do you think of the arguments and any proposed solutions? Who benefits and who is disadvantaged?

Once you believe you have covered the topic from all perspectives, you should develop a solution, develop arguments that support your case, and then collect any relevant supporting material. This process includes the exclusion of irrelevant arguments and material. Undirected and unthinking research will result in an intractable pile of notes, largely irrelevant and probably deficient at critical points. Both the structure and style are important when writing a report. The structure is important because it should be used to guide the reader through the report. Style is important because it affects the reader’s experience, and may impact on their acceptance of your arguments and conclusion. You must develop a style which produces an orderly examination of the question and the way the key elements are presented. For example, the simple addition of a header and footer and highlighted sub-headings will make all the difference to the layout of your assignment. A good report should be planned or structured in a logical and coherent manner. It should unfold in a pleasant and interesting manner: the reader’s attention should be held, ideas and arguments should be well marshalled to substantiate points, repetition should be avoided, and each paragraph should flow smoothly into the next, carrying the reader a step nearer to the desired conclusion. Plan your report so it is not merely a compilation of facts or a statement in your words of the opinions of others. The best reports do not just arrange facts and arguments, they involve critical judgement too. To be critical is not just to disagree with an author or a question. It is an attempt to reveal weakness in an argument or show where the author fails to take significant factors into account, or where conclusions do not logically flow from stated premises. You do not have to have better arguments or criticisms than that found in books consulted. Your main individual contribution comes from how you order and arrange your material, how you comment on it, and how you show it relates to the questions under discussion. The introduction and conclusion sections can often make or break a report. The use of other headings and sub-headings can be important, although this depends on the context. For example, in this course you should be guided by the marking criteria set out for each assignment. The structure The introduction should include a clear statement of the scope of your intended discussion and establish the limits of your report. The introductory paragraph(s) should be used to establish the context of the topic, to ask questions, raise issues and make assertions which will be taken up at length in the body of the essay. Analysis is the next step and involves the orderly presentation of the chosen material so that it shows how it bears on the questions you have identified. You may disagree with other people, including experts, but be careful as readers will discount your work if your opinions are demonstrably false or superficial, and not supported. Support your arguments with theories and facts. Your study book, and the other references, are designed to give you a good grounding in town planning theory and practice, so if you make an observation about your issue you should refer back to these documents to support what you are saying. The following is an example of a supported observation: The neighbourhood unit began to develop during the early 19th century due to its proximity to reliable water and the main stock route. A local historian, John Smith observed that the town grew in a disorderly fashion as residential allotments were created from larger land holdings in response to the strong market demand for land. This type of development is characteristic of the laissez-faire development patterns exhibited during the Industrial Revolution. (USQ, 2006, 1.11) If you use this technique it demonstrates that you have read the study notes and can make the link between what you’ve read and a real-world example. Plans, photos and other materials should be used to illustrate the issues you are discussing and to support your arguments. Put yourself in the reader’s shoes when determining what should be included, and all such materials should be referred to in the text. You should also ensure that the source of these documents is cited. For example, if you make a point about a certain street, building, relationship in the urban environment, go out and take a photo of it and include it in your report. Remember that you should only include plans and photos if they support your case, they have little value if they are at the wrong scale or unrecognisable. Finally, you should avoid presenting factual material for its own sake and presenting generalisations which are not supported by appropriate evidence. Factual material is, of course, important but it is relevant only when used to support intelligent discussion on the report topic. The conclusion should draw together all the points, arguments and aspects treated in the report into a concise answer to the questions. You should begin by restating the thesis you originally gave in the introduction but this time it should be based on the analysis and arguments you have presented in the body of the report. Writing The written report is a form of communication devoid of the gestures and accents of normal conversation. Its style, therefore, should be clear, simple, brisk and to the point. Clichés, colloquialisms, ill-defined jargon, over-long words and sentences, and contrived witticisms are detrimental to clarity and should be avoided. Similarly, factual recitation is deadening. As a report is also of a stipulated length, e.g. 3000 words give or take 10 percent, there is an additional demand for precision and word-economy. Failure to meet the required length probably means that insufficient thought has been given to the topic whilst a serious exceeding of the word limit probably means that much unnecessary padding has been included. A report should be written at least twice – rough draft and the final submission – but sections of it, such as difficult or critical paragraphs, should be constantly reworked and polished until the meaning is clear and precise. The final text should be thoroughly read and checked for punctuation, grammar, and unintended omission before submission. For these reasons, a good report cannot be attempted at the last moment – in the week before the due date. The report should be commenced as soon as the topic is announced: thinking, arguing, reading, reflecting, and writing about the topic over a period of weeks will be repaid in time, energy, structure, relevance and judgement. It is through this regimen of research and writing that the student’s personal view and style will be perfected. Formal language should always be used when writing an academic, professional report, or journal article: Always write in the third person, i.e. never use ‘I’, ‘my’ or ‘we’. It is not acceptable to use casual language such as ‘they made a go of it’, ‘the neighbourhood is a pretty neat place’ or ‘heaps of people’. Avoid using clichés, colloquialisms, ill-defined jargon and contrived witticisms. Use full versions of words. For example, you should not use shorthand versions of words such as: approx.; min.; or don’t. If you want to use an acronym, then you should define it by placing it in brackets after the first time the full text version is used in the essay. For example, the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) is holding its conference in Melbourne. You should carefully check your report to ensure that individual sentences and paragraphs are correctly structured, and that you have correctly spelled all the words.

Some things to look out for are: Each paragraph should contain only one idea or thought. Check that each sentence is correctly punctuated and has meaning. Capitals should only be used for names (including zone or precinct names in planning schemes). East, west etc. or the tavern should be not capitalised unless used as part of a name e.g. the Bridge Street Tavern or East York. Be careful about using apostrophes, for example using 1960’s instead of 1960s. If you write ‘the 1960’s architecture was interesting’, then the 1960s owns the architecture and so the apostrophe is used. But if you write ‘during the 1960s a new form of architecture was seen’, there is no ownership of the architecture and so just the plural form is used. Format The layout of your report on the paper can have an impact on the readers experience so it is important that the format of the text invites the reader to continue reading through the whole essay. Reports should be typed using 1.5 line spacing and only one side of the page should be used. For student assignments, you should leave a margin wide enough for the lecturer to write comments – say 4–5 centimetres. Please ensure that the title of your report correctly reflects your work and that the course code and name, and your name and student number are included on the title page. Referencing your work You must acknowledge all the sources that you have used in your report. If you take an idea, statistic, thought or opinion from something you’ve read or someone you’ve spoken to, you need to cite where it came from. Your final report must be your own work and unacknowledged quotations, theories, concepts, plans, or contributions constitutes plagiarism and, when detected, will be penalised. By all means discuss your report with other people. When making quotations they should be short, accurate, acknowledged, and relevant to the point you are developing. They are best used to discuss the words used or actual argument of the author and must be linked in to your report. You should use quotations sparingly and do not use them to give information or sum up an argument. Your own words are essential for this. You should start the checking by carefully proofreading the text at least twice. You should also ask a friend or your spouse to read and correct it for you. Even if they have no idea what you’re writing about, they will find formatting and structural problems as well as grammatical, and spelling mistakes. These are easy to correct and should lead to additional marks! You should carefully check the following: Ensure you are satisfied that your report answers the actual question set. Do not fall into the trap of answering only half or part of a questions Ensure the title is clearly stated and not changed to suit your personal preferences Leave a margin wide enough for the lecturer to write comments Make sure the course name, and your name, is on the title page of the essay Check all the figures and tables are correctly numbered and, where appropriate, cited Check all your sources are correctly cited and referenced

Marking rubric for ENV2201 Assignment 2 Student name
Element Excellent Good Satisfactory Poorly done Not/very poorly done Marks
Part A Report (270 marks)
Content: Open and closed ecosystems, biodiversity, holistic view of natural systems, components of ecosystems – tolerance ranges and limiting factors, energy flows and nutrient cycles, pollutants in ecosystems, ecological succession, degradation of soil and water, erosion, soil conservation ag land and non-ag land, conservation (200 marks) Content covers all relevant areas in depth, ecosystems correctly defined/ identified, system components correctly stated, impact of development/intent on tolerance ranges and limiting factors professionally addressed clearly described, pollution issues identified, and effective conservation measures proposed (160-200) Range and depth of content mostly achieved, content covers most relevant areas in depth, ecosystems mostly correctly defined/ identified, system components mostly correctly stated, impact of development/intent on tolerance ranges and limiting factors professionally addressed clearly described, pollution issues identified, and some effective conservation measures proposed (141-159) Content covers range of topics at an acceptable depth, content covers some areas in depth, ecosystems mostly correctly defined/ identified, system components mostly correctly stated, impact of development/intent on tolerance ranges and limiting factors adequately described, pollution issues identified, and a few effective conservation measures proposed (100-140) Range and depth of content lacking, content covers only one or two areas in depth, ecosystems mostly incorrectly defined/ identified, system components mostly incorrectly stated, impact of development/intent on tolerance ranges and limiting factors inadequately addressed, one or two pollution issues identified, and limited conservation measures proposed (50-99) Not done/content lacking in most areas, content covers only one area in depth, ecosystems incorrectly defined/ identified, system components incorrectly stated, impact of development/intent on tolerance ranges and limiting factors not addressed, one pollution issues identified, and no conservation measures proposed (0-49) /200
Structure and logic Writing style Grammar, punctuation, terminology (25 marks) Structure and logic allow for clear understanding of content, almost perfect grammar, no typing errors, style professional and terminology used correctly (20-25) Content presented in a well-structured way, logic mostly evident, grammar mostly correct, few typing errors, writing style mostly professional and terminology mostly used correctly (15-19) Content presented in an understandable order, structure fairly evident, several grammatical issues/typing errors, writing style not consistently professional and use of terminology some issues(10-14) Content not presented in an understandable order, structure not evident, major grammatical issues, several typing errors, writing style not consistently professional and use of terminology several issues (5-9) Logic and structure of content mostly absent, poor grammar, many typing errors, unprofessional writing style and use of terminology (0-4) /25
Prescribed sections Professional presentation Word count (2500-2800) (20 marks) All prescribed elements present in prescribed order, professional presentation, title page, headers and footers used, lists of tables and figures professionally prepared, page and paragraph numbering professional, student details complete, word count within limits and stated on title page (17-20) Most prescribed elements present in prescribed order, title page, mostly professional presentation, headers and footers used, page and paragraph numbering professional, student details complete, word count within limits and stated on title page (14-16) Most prescribed elements present in mostly prescribed order, some issues with title page, mostly professional presentation, headers and footers used, page and paragraph numbering minor issues, student details complete, word count within limits and stated on title page (10-13) Several prescribed elements present absent, not in prescribed order, presentation lacks professionalism, headers and footers issues, page and paragraph numbering major issues, student details incomplete, word count outside limits, not stated on title page (5-9) Several prescribed elements present absent, not in prescribed order, presentation lacks professionalism, headers and footers absent/issues, page and paragraph numbering absent/major issues, student details incomplete, word count more than 10% outside limits, not stated on title page (0-4) /20
Illustration quality, quantity and captioning Referencing and citations (25 marks) Professionally prepared graphs, tables, images, variety and from variety of sources, captioning correct, ample citations, reference list and style almost no issues, appropriate references from a wide variety of sources (20-25) Professionally prepared graphs, tables, images, variety and from several of sources, captioning mostly correct, ample citations, reference list and style few issues, appropriate references from a wide variety of sources, minor issues with tables and graphs, mostly appropriate sources used (15-19) Graphs, tables, images present, minor issues with variety and sources, captioning some issues, adequate citations, reference list and style some issues, mostly appropriate references from a variety of sources, some issues with tables and graphs (10-14) Few graphs, tables, images present, major issues with variety and sources, captioning several issues, inadequate/inappropriate citations, reference list and style several issues, several in- appropriate references from one or two sources, several issues with tables and graphs (5-9) Not done/very few graphs, tables, images, major issues with variety and sources, captioning absent/serious issues, inadequate/ inappropriate citations, reference list and style absent/major issues, mostly inappropriate references from one or two sources (0-4) /25
Marks for Part A /270
Part B Reflection (30 marks)
Element Excellent Good Satisfactory Poorly done

Not/very poorly done Marks
Substantive, relevant content (300-500 words) Creative, appropriate content, word count correct (10) Very appropriate content, word count correct (8-9) Appropriate content, word count within limits (6-7) Content fairly appropriate but word count off (3-5) Not done or content a conclusion and not a reflection (0-2) /10
Logical reasoning Logic and justification of opinion clear and backed up by examples that are deemed evidence (10) Logic and justification of opinion evident, some examples provided (8-9) Logic and justification of opinion evident (6-7) Logic or reasoning not evident, no justification of opinion (3-5) No logic or reasoning evident (0-2) /10
Language skills Almost perfect language skills (10) Fair language skills, few grammar issues (8-9) Language skills acceptable (6-7) Major issues with language skills, poor grammar, lacking vocabulary (3-5) Poor language skills, very poor grammar, lacking vocabulary (0-2) /10
Marks for Part B /30
Total marks for Assignment 2 / 300
Additional written comments

Marker: Date:

The post Assignment 2 covers Module 4 appeared first on My Assignment Online.

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

Native UK, USA & Australia writers Deadline from 3 hours 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included Unlimited free revisions Free to submit — compare quotes
Scroll to Top