La Trobe University 17
Assessment 3 – Individual (Case Study) Report
| N 49 or less% D 50-59% C 60-69% B 70-79% A 80-100% |
| Introduction (10) No clear purpose, scope or limitations or identification of the case study; No clear understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. No organisation/order of each section of the report. Basic understanding of purpose, scope and limitations; Basic outline of case study and understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. Reasonable organisation/order of each section of the report. Clear and concise purpose, scope and limitations; Developed description of the case study and understanding of the context of the organisation – case study. Succinct organisation/order of each section of the report. Clear and purposeful outline of purpose, scope and limitations; The case study context well developed. Clear and concise organisation/order of each section of the report. Excellent outline of purpose, scope and limitations; The case study and context explained at an advanced level. Excellent understanding of the organisation. Outstanding organisation/order of each section of the report. |
| 0-4.5 5-5.5 6-6.5 7-7.5 8-10 |
| What are the issues in the case? Identify and critically discuss the issues in this case – must include operations across different countries, customer and staffing issues. (20) No evidence of understanding or evaluating the issues in the case study. No summary of main theories and concepts; No critical analysis of the literature. Basic ideas formulated to link to the organisational context and the issues in the case study; Fundamental theories and concepts summarised. Simple analysis of the literature. Ability to conceptualise and describe the issues in the case study; Evidence of critical analysis. Clear and concise description of the organisational context and issues in the case study; Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. Report outlines the organisational context and the issues in the case study. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. |
| 0-9.5 10-11.5 12-13.5 14-15.5 16-20 |
| How should HRM deal with the issues in the case? Explain how HRM should ensure the issues are not repeated taking into consideration the international environment. (40) No demonstrated ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. No critical analysis of the literature. Demonstrates basic ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Displays basic information. Simple analysis of the literature. Demonstrates consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Evidence of critical analysis. Demonstrates thoroughly consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. Demonstrates outstanding ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. |
| 0-19.5 20-23.5 24-27.5 28-31.5 32-40 |
| Conclusion and Recommendation/s/ Solution/s and Implementation Plan. What is your plan as an International HRM consultant to present to the company/case study (10) Conclusion does not summarise the report; No clear recommendations or implementation plan. Reasonably clear summary of the report; Recommendations link well to the identified issues and implementation plan evident. Above average ability to summarise the report; Sound recommendations related to the identified issues and implementation plan well planned. Ability to make sound evaluation of the report; Good ability to make sound recommendations relative to the identified issues and implementation plan very well developed. An insightful and comprehensive summary of the report; Outstanding capacity to make recommendations for effective solutions relative to the identified issues and implementation plan exceptionally well developed. |
| 0-4.5 5-5.5 6-6.5 7-7.5 8-10 |
| Research and Referencing (10) Inadequate reading and research – less than 15 contemporary (beyond 2008) refereed journal articles; Research is evident but is inappropriate or irrelevant; Numerous referencing errors throughout the document and the reference list. Minimal reading and research – basic 15 contemporary (beyond 2008) refereed journal articles; Limited use of relevant research, demonstrating little engagement with literature; Average and sometimes inconsistent application of referencing with some errors throughout the document and the reference list. Reading and research beyond set minimum. Use of relevant research to support findings; Reasonable application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. Evidence of wide reading and research; Evidence of critical and analytical use of relevant literature; Good application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. Evidence of extensive reading and research; Relevant literature used critically and analytically, presenting a balance of perspectives Excellent application of referencing throughout the document and the reference list. |
| 0-4.5 5-5.5 6-6.5 7-7.5 8-10 |
La Trobe University 18
| N 49 or less% D 50-59% C 60-69% B 70-79% A 80-100% |
| Format, Clarity, Presentation and Proof-reading (10) No short report format; no structure; No headings; Inadequate application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Unacceptable level of grammar, punctuation and or spelling Presentation adequate in accordance with short report format, but not fully consistent with appropriate academic style; Adequate headings; Adequate application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Some errors in grammar, punctuation and/or spelling. Presentation consistent with short report format and academic style; Good headings; Good application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Generally, good grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presentation thoroughly consistent with short report format and academic style; Excellent headings Consistent application of academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Very accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. Outstanding presentation thoroughly consistent with short report format and high standards in writing academic style; Excellent headings that highlight the case study; High facility with academic genre, generic structure relevant to topic; Comprehensively accurate grammar, punctuation and spelling. |
| 0-4.5 5-5.5 6-6.5 7-7.5 8-10 |
The post Assessment 3 – Individual (Case Study) Report appeared first on My Assignment Online.
