EDU3EI Assessment Three –Social Story Revised Rubric
| Criteria | Strongly meets or exceeds requirements 80-100% |
Soundly meets requirements 70-79% |
Meets requirements 60-69% |
Meets limited requirements 50-59% |
Does not meet requirements 0-49% |
| Represent | The implications of using a social story to support learning has been expertly identified. Discussion is expertly communicated with the support of valuable references that reinforce the quality of the discussion. Extensive sources of information are referenced with accuracy and communicated to a high standard according to APA6 conventions. |
The value of using a social story to support learning has been thoughtfully identified. Discussion is thoughtfully communicated with the support of relevant references that support the quality of the discussion. All sources of information are referenced with accuracy and communicated according to APA6 conventions. |
The benefits of using a social story to support learning has been somewhat identified. Discussion is communicated with the support of some relevant references that support the discussion. Some sources of information are referenced with accuracy and communicated according to APA6 conventions |
The use of a social story to support learning has been tenuously identified. Discussion is communicated with little support from references to support the discussion. Limited sources of information are referenced with accuracy and or communicated according to APA6 conventions. |
The use of a social story to support learning has not been identified effectively. Discussion does not meet the standard necessary for this task. Limited or inaccurate use of sources of information, referencing and communication according to APA6 conventions. |
| 10 | 10, 9, 8 marks | 7 marks | 6 marks | 5 marks | 0-4 marks |
| Identify | Perceptive and respectful information has been provided, representative of insightful teacher knowledge, drawing on important information needed to develop a social story. Extensive and purposeful use of references reflective of APA6 referencing and conventions. |
Informed and respectful information has been provided, representative of well-developed teacher knowledge, drawing on important information needed to develop a social story. Informed use of references reflective of APA6 referencing and conventions. |
Some information has been provided, representative of developing teacher knowledge, drawing on information relevant to developing a social story. Some use of references reflective of APA6 referencing and conventions. |
Limited information has been provided, representative of tenuous teacher knowledge, drawing on limited information in developing a social story. limited use of references with inaccurate APA6 referencing and conventions. |
The information provided is not representative of the required teacher knowledge in developing a social story. References are not included or do not reflect APA6 referencing and conventions. |
| 10 | 10, 9, 8 marks | 7 marks | 6 marks | 5 marks | 0-4 marks |
| Illustrate | An outstanding social story, addressing the key attributes of the approach, connecting expertly with the child’s needs, providing a child centred example of this inclusion tool. Discussion is expertly justified, supported with significant references and accurate attention to APA6 conventions. |
A thoughtful social story, addressing important attributes of the approach, connecting effectively with the child’s needs, providing a child centred example of this inclusion tool. Discussion is well justified, supported with considered references and mostly accurate attention to APA6 conventions. |
A relevant social story, addressing some attributes of the approach, connecting somewhat with the child’s needs, providing a developing child centred example of this inclusion tool. Discussion is somewhat justified, supported with few references and developing awareness of APA6 conventions. |
A limited social story, addressing few attributes of the approach, connecting tenuously with the child’s needs, providing an emerging example of this inclusion tool. Discussion is limited in justification, supported with inappropriate references and recognition of APA6 conventions. |
The social story does not address the required attributes of the approach. Discussion and references do not meet APA6 conventions and the expectations of the task. |
| 10 | 10, 9, 8 marks | 7 marks | 6 marks | 5 marks | 0-4 marks |
| Reflect | Reflection critiques social stories alongside other inclusive pedagogies in supporting diverse learners. Discussion expertly connects with aspects of the submission to reinforce key ideas and positions the family as integral to the inclusion process. Discussion is expertly justified, supported with significant references and accurate attention to APA6 conventions. |
Reflection compares social stories alongside other forms of inclusive pedagogies in supporting diverse learners. Discussion thoughtfully connects with aspects of the submission to justify key ideas and positions the family as important to the inclusion process. Discussion is well justified, supported with considered references and mostly accurate attention to APA6 conventions. |
Reflection considers social stories alongside some forms of inclusive pedagogies in catering for learners. Discussion connects somewhat with aspects of the submission and positions identifies the family in the inclusion process. Discussion is somewhat justified, supported with few references and developing awareness of APA6 conventions. |
Reflection shows a limited understanding of social stories alongside other forms of inclusion support in catering for learners. Discussion tenuously explains the importance of the family in the inclusion process. Discussion is limited in justification, supported with inappropriate references and recognition of APA6 conventions. |
Reflection does not show necessary understanding of the use of social stories alongside other forms of inclusion expected for this task. Families are not represented. Discussion and references do not meet APA6 conventions and the expectations of the task. |
| 10 | 10, 9, 8 marks | 7 marks | 6 marks | 5 marks | 0-4 marks |
| Total Marks: /40 |
The post EDU3EI Assessment appeared first on My Assignment Online.
