FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS PROGRAMME
ACADEMIC YEAR 2019-2020, 2nd Semester
August – 2020
WRIT3
| Programme Title: A&F | |
| Module Title: Performance Management | |
| Module Code: GAC5010 | |
| Assessment Method: Coursework | |
| Level: 5 | Block: 2 |
| Module Credits: 20 | Weighting: 50% |
| Due Date: 23-Jun-2020, 12:00 AM | Word Count: 3,000 |
| Examiner(s): Dr. Rodrigo M. Velasco |
| Version: 1 |
Pg. 2 Version 1
Gulf College – Faculty of Business and Management Studies – In academic
Affiliation with CARDIFF SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
| A. |
Written work A signed declaration that the work is your own (apart from otherwise referenced acknowledgements) must be included after the reference page of your assignment Each page must be numbered. Where appropriate, a contents page, a list of tables/figures and a list of abbreviations should precede your work. All referencing must adhere to School/Institutional requirements. A word count must be stated at the end of your work. Appendices should be kept to the minimum and be of direct relevance to the content of your work. All tables and figures must be correctly numbered and labelled. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| B. |
Other types of coursework/assignments Where coursework involves oral presentations, discussions, poster presentations, etc., specific instructions will be provided by your module leader/team. |
———————————————————————————————————————————————
Rewrite below part just after the References of your assignment.
WORK DECLARATION
I, , hereby declare that the uploaded Coursework through Turnitin is my own work. I affirm that this
has been researched and completed in accordance with the college rules and regulations on
plagiarism.
I acknowledge the advice given by the module tutors on proper referencing to avoid plagiarism and
the rules on the academic unfair practice.
I acknowledge that I read and understand the plagiarism guide written at the end of this assessment.
Any academic misconduct will be handled according to the rules and regulations of the university.
Pg. 3 Version 1
General instructions
Coursework must be submitted online through Turnitin before due date. An acknowledgement will
be given to you by your teacher upon presentation of the finance clearance. This is your receipt,
keep it.
The only circumstance in which assignments can be uploaded late via Turnitin is if a Mitigating
Circumstances (MC) form is submitted at the same time. In these circumstances work may be
submitted within five (5) working days. Make sure to secure MC form and submit the same to the
concerned staff.
Write the number of words used, excluding references, at the end of your assignment. Provide the
list of sources you used at the last page of your assignment with proper label ‘References’. You may
include diagrams, figures etc. without word penalty. The number of words will be + or – 10% of the
total words allowed.
A work declaration must be included just after the reference page of your assignment. This ensures
that you prepare your work in good faith. Any form of collusion and/or academic unfair practice will
be dealt with according to the pertinent rules and regulations of the partner university. Please read
carefully the plagiarism guide.
Assessment Details
This Coursework comprises 50% of the total assessments marks. It will develop the following skills:
1. Research skills. Students are able to search for relevant literature and studies to support the
assignment theories and concepts.
2. Critical thinking. Students are able to evaluate the scenario given in the assignment and apply
solutions to the queries posed.
In addition, the assessment will test the following learning outcomes:
Identify relevant costs & appropriate techniques for decision making & use them to
facilitate the solution of a range of realistic management problems
Pg. 4 Version 1
Assessment Task
Ahmed Ali, the operations manager of Muscat Traders, is not fully convinced that he will be removed from his
post any time soon. After he received a letter from the CEO asking for clarifications on the various major
decisions he made, he felt that everyone is just perplexed by the implementations of the various performance
management tools. He was given by the CEO three days for complete explanation. He hired you as a consultant
on this matter. The following details were made clear by Ahmed Ali:
1. Mansoor, the production head, complained about the immediate implementation of Business
Process Re-engineering (BPR). He explained that the company is not yet ready for BPR. Instead, he
suggested that lean management be applied in all the production processes and procedures.
2. Fathma, the marketing manager, asked for the equal production of the various sizes of bed
sheets that the home decoration department manufactures. According to Ahmed Ali, there is limited
supply of raw materials used in the production. The decision comes after the preparation of the production
budget. He presented to you the following production data.
The home decoration department of the company produces three sizes of bed sheets. The sheet is made
from linen fabric that costs OMR 0.550 per metre. The workers are paid for OMR 0.200 per hour. The
company incurred fixed costs of OMR1,200 in 2019. The production data for 2019 follows:
| Size | Twin | Queen | King |
| Direct material (metre per unit) | 1.3 | 2 | 2.5 |
| Direct labour (hours per unit) | 2 | 2.5 | 3 |
| Direct expenses (per unit) | OMR 2 | OMR 2.5 | OMR 4 |
| Selling price per unit | OMR 5 | OMR 5 | OMR 5 |
The supply of linen fabric is limited to 1,000 metres. The budget production (based upon maximum
demand) follows: Twin (200 bed sheets); Queen (220 bed sheets) and King (180 bed sheets).
3. Mahmood, the finance manager, argued that it is wrong decision to reduce the selling price of the
personalised mugs the houseware department manufactures. He said that reducing the price does not
give them advantage over the competitors. However, Ahmed Ali explained that the selling price
reduction gives lower contribution margin but increases the inventory turnover. Relevant to this, he
gave the following production data.
The houseware department manufactures personalised mugs used as token on various corporate events.
There were 2,000 mugs sold for OMR 3.950 each in 2019.
Pg. 5 Version 1
| Cost | Unit price in OMR |
| Direct materials | OMR 1.100 |
| Direct labour | OMR 0.900 |
| Variable overhead | OMR 0.100 |
| Variable selling costs | OMR 0.150 |
| Fixed manufacturing | OMR 2,200 |
| Fixed non-manufacturing costs | OMR 2,200 |
| Fixed selling expenses | OMR 500 |
Prepare a report for Ahmed Ali addressing the following:
1. Concerns on production process and procedures: (600 words)
a. Discuss the specific aims and applications of Business Process Re-engineering.
b. Discuss the specific aims and applications of Lean Management.
c. In terms of small-scale productions, discuss the appropriate performance management measures.
2. Concerns on limited resources: (1000 words)
a. Critically analyse the factors affecting limited resources in production management.
b. Based from the given data, prepare a production budget that will yield maximum profit from the
material available.
c. Based from your production budget, explain the reasons for unequal production of bed sheets.
d. Discuss measures to maximize profit with limited resources.
3. Concerns on production costing: (1000 words)
a. Discuss the application of variable costing and absorption costing in manufacturing industries.
b. Based from the given data, prepare the income statement using the variable and absorption
costing.
c. If Ahmed Ali decides to reduce the selling price of the product to OMR 3, prepare the income
statement using both the costing methods.
d. Discuss whether the decision to reduce the selling price is favourable or unfavourable.
4. Recommendation (400 words)
a. Prepare a summary report identifying the major decisions made by Ahmed Ali. State your stand,
whether the decision is justified or not.
b. Discuss the implications of the CEO’s actions on the performance of Ahmed Ali as production
manager.
References
| |
Use at least 5 sources preferably refereed accounting journals and books or e-books. Use the proper Harvard referencing style adopted by Gulf College. |
Pg. 6 Version 1
GAC5010 – Performance Management
AY: 2019-2020 / 2nd Semester
Marking Scheme
| No. | Description | Marks Allocated |
| 1 | Discussion on Business Process Re-engineering – 5 marks Discussion on Lean Management – 5 marks Discussion on the appropriate performance management measures of small scale production – 10 marks |
20 |
| 2 | Analysis of limited resources in production – 10 marks Preparation of production budget – 10 marks Explanation of the unequal production – 5 marks Discussion on maximisation of profit – 10 marks |
35 |
| 3 | Discussion of variable and absorption costing – 5 marks Preparation of income statement – 10 marks Preparation of income statement using reduced price – 10 marks Discussion of the decision – 10 marks |
35 |
| 4 | Preparation of summary report – 5 marks Discussion on the implications of the CEO’s actions – 5 marks |
10 |
Plagiarism
1. Plagiarism, which can be defined as using without acknowledgement another person’s words or ideas
and submitting them for assessment as though it were one’s own work, for instance by copying,
translating from one language to another or unacknowledged paraphrasing. Further examples of
plagiarism are given below:
Use of any quotation(s) from the published or unpublished work of other persons, whether published
in textbooks, articles, the Web, or in any other format, which quotations have not been clearly
identified as such by being placed in quotation marks and acknowledged.
Use of another person’s words or ideas that have been slightly changed or paraphrased to make it
look different from the original.
Summarising another person’s ideas, judgments, diagrams, figures, or computer programmes without
reference to that person in the text and the source in a bibliography or reference list.
Use of services of essay banks and/or any other agencies.
Use of unacknowledged material downloaded from the Internet.
Pg. 7 Version 1
Re-use of one’s own material except as authorised by the department.
2. Collusion, which can be defined as when work that has been undertaken by or with others is submitted
and passed off as solely as the work of one person. This also applies where the work of one candidate
is submitted in the name of another. Where this is done with the knowledge of the originator both
parties can be considered to be at fault.
3. Fabrication of data, making false claims to have carried out experiments, observations, interviews or
other forms of data collection and analysis, or acting dishonestly in any other way.
Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS)
As part of its commitment to quality and the maintenance of academic standards, the University reserves the
right to use Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS), including Turnitin. Such software makes no judgment as to
whether a piece of work has been plagiarised; it simply highlights sections of text that have been found in
other sources.
The use of plagiarism detection software fulfills two functions. The first is to enhance student learning (i.e. as
a developmental tool); the second is to guard against and identify unfair practice in assessment.
Further information and guidance can be found in the University’s policy on the Use of Plagiarism Detection
Software.
Pg. 8 Version 1
GAC5010 – Performance Management
AY: 2019-2020 / 2nd Semester
Marking Criteria
Your assessment marks will be based on the following rubrics:
| 0 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 100 | |
| Very Poor | Very Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Outstanding | Exceptional | |
| Discussion on Business Process Re engineering – 5 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to answer the basic requirements of the task but lacks clarity; highly irrelevant ideas and concepts; highly irrelevant materials which reflects very limited subject knowledge; no assignment objectives set |
Poor discussion of the assessment task; irrelevant ideas and concepts; irrelevant materials which reflects very limited subject knowledge; no clear assignment objectives |
Basic discussion of the assessment task; limited ideas and concepts; limited use of relevant materials which reflects limited subject knowledge; assignment objectives are unclear |
Good discussion of points in the assessment; relevant ideas; relevant materials reflects subject knowledge; assignment objectives are set |
Very good discussion of the points in the assessment task; relevant ideas and concepts; relevant materials reflects thoroughness of subject knowledge; assignment objectives are defined |
Excellent discussion of the main points in the assessment task; highly relevant ideas and concepts; excellent presentation of relevant materials which reflects thoroughness of subject knowledge; clearly defined assignment objectives |
Outstanding discussion of the main points in the assessment task; highly relevant ideas and concepts; outstanding presentation of relevant materials which reflects thoroughness of subject knowledge; clearly defined assignment objectives |
Exceptional discussion of the main points in the assessment task; highly relevant ideas and concepts; exceptional presentation of relevant materials which reflects thoroughness of subject knowledge; clearly defined assignment objectives |
| Discussion on Lean Management – 5 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to answer the basic requirements of the task but lacks clarity; highly irrelevant ideas and concepts; highly irrelevant materials |
Poor discussion of the assessment task; irrelevant ideas and concepts; irrelevant materials which reflects very limited |
Basic discussion of the assessment task; limited ideas and concepts; limited use of relevant materials which reflects limited |
Good discussion of points in the assessment; relevant ideas; relevant materials reflects subject knowledge; assignment |
Very good discussion of the points in the assessment task; relevant ideas and concepts; relevant materials reflects thoroughness of subject knowledge; |
Excellent discussion of the main points in the assessment task; highly relevant ideas and concepts; excellent presentation of relevant materials which reflects |
Outstanding discussion of the main points in the assessment task; highly relevant ideas and concepts; outstanding presentation of relevant materials which reflects |
Exceptional discussion of the main points in the assessment task; highly relevant ideas and concepts; exceptional presentation of relevant materials which reflects |
Pg. 9 Version 1
| which reflects very limited subject knowledge; no assignment objectives set |
subject knowledge; no clear assignment objectives |
subject knowledge; assignment objectives are unclear |
objectives are set |
assignment objectives are defined |
thoroughness of subject knowledge; clearly defined assignment objectives |
thoroughness of subject knowledge; clearly defined assignment objectives |
thoroughness of subject knowledge; clearly defined assignment objectives |
||
| Discussion on the appropriate performance management measures of small scale production – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to examine thecase but no originality; very poor organisation of ideas; very poor analysis of arguments; no details and evidences; no theories used to address the issue |
Poor examination of the case with no originality; ideas are not organised; poor analysis of arguments; very limited concepts with no relevant evidences; limited theories to address issues |
Basic examination of the case with limited originality; ideas not properly organised; basic analysis with limited arguments; compare contrast concepts with limited details and evidences; limited use of theories to address issues |
Good examination of the case with originality; organised ideas; organised arguments; compare contrast concepts supported by details; distinguish theories to address issues |
Very good examination of the case with perception and originality; organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details; distinguish theories with evidences to address issues. |
Excellent examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
Outstanding examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
Exceptional examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues. |
| Analysis of limited resources in production – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to examine thecase but no originality; very poor organisation of ideas; very poor analysis of arguments; |
Poor examination of the case with no originality; ideas are not organised; poor analysis of |
Basic examination of the case with limited originality; ideas not properly organised; basic analysis |
Good examination of the case with originality; organised ideas; organised arguments; |
Very good examination of the case with perception and originality; organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays |
Excellent examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and |
Outstanding examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and |
Exceptional examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and |
Pg. 10 Version 1
| no details and evidences; no theories used to address the issue |
arguments; very limited concepts with no relevant evidences; limited theories to address issues |
with limited arguments; compare contrast concepts with limited details and evidences; limited use of theories to address issues |
compare contrast concepts supported by details; distinguish theories to address issues |
organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details; distinguish theories with evidences to address issues. |
ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues. |
||
| Preparation of production budget – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
Very poor calculations. Totally irrelevant answers. Inappropriate structure. |
Poor calculations with no formula. There are major errors on the final answer without proper workings. There are major presentation and organisation errors. |
Basic calculations supported by few formula. There are major errors on workings and final answers. Presentation and organisation errors are visible. |
Good calculations with formula but with errors on workings and final answers. Good presentation but with mistakes on organisation and structure. |
Very good calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Very good presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Excellent calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Excellent presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Outstanding calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Outstanding presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Exceptional calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Exceptional presentation and organisation of calculations. |
| Explanation of the unequal production – 5 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to summarise the assessment task; very poor synthesis of the |
Poor synthesis of the assessment task; weak summary of the points |
Satisfactory synthesis of the assessment task; satisfactory summary of |
Good synthesis of the assessment task; good summary of the points |
Very good synthesis of the points of the assessment task; very good summary of the evidences; |
Excellent synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; excellent summary of the evidences |
Outstanding synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; outstanding summary of the |
Exceptional synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; exceptional summary of the |
Pg. 11 Version 1
| assessment task; very weak summary of the points presented; very weak position on the points raised |
presented; weak position on the points raised |
the points presented; unclear position on the points raised |
presented; clear position on the points raised |
strong position on the points raised |
presented; profound position on the main points raised |
evidences presented; profound position on the main points raised |
evidences presented; profound position on the main points raised |
||
| Discussion on maximisation of profit – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to examine thecase but no originality; very poor organisation of ideas; very poor analysis of arguments; no details and evidences; no theories used to address the issue |
Poor examination of the case with no originality; ideas are not organised; poor analysis of arguments; very limited concepts with no relevant evidences; limited theories to address issues |
Basic examination of the case with limited originality; ideas not properly organised; basic analysis with limited arguments; compare contrast concepts with limited details and evidences; limited use of theories to address issues |
Good examination of the case with originality; organised ideas; organised arguments; compare contrast concepts supported by details; distinguish theories to address issues |
Very good examination of the case with perception and originality; organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details; distinguish theories with evidences to address issues. |
Excellent examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
Outstanding examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
Exceptional examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues. |
| Discussion of variable and absorption costing – 5 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to examine thecase but no originality; very poor |
Poor examination of the case with no originality; |
Basic examination of the case with limited originality; |
Good examination of the case with originality; |
Very good examination of the case with perception and originality; |
Excellent examination of the case with a high degree of perception and |
Outstanding examination of the case with a high degree of perception and |
Exceptional examination of the case with a high degree of perception and |
Pg. 12 Version 1
| organisation of ideas; very poor analysis of arguments; no details and evidences; no theories used to address the issue |
ideas are not organised; poor analysis of arguments; very limited concepts with no relevant evidences; limited theories to address issues |
ideas not properly organised; basic analysis with limited arguments; compare contrast concepts with limited details and evidences; limited use of theories to address issues |
organised ideas; organised arguments; compare contrast concepts supported by details; distinguish theories to address issues |
organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details; distinguish theories with evidences to address issues. |
originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well-organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues. |
||
| Preparation of income statement – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
Very poor calculations. Totally irrelevant answers. Inappropriate structure. |
Poor calculations with no formula. There are major errors on the final answer without proper workings. There are major presentation and organisation errors. |
Basic calculations supported by few formula. There are major errors on workings and final answers. Presentation and organisation errors are visible. |
Good calculations with formula but with errors on workings and final answers. Good presentation but with mistakes on organisation and structure. |
Very good calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Very good presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Excellent calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Excellent presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Outstanding calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Outstanding presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Exceptional calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Exceptional presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Pg. 13 Version 1
| Preparation of income statement using reduced price – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
Very poor calculations. Totally irrelevant answers. Inappropriate structure. |
Poor calculations with no formula. There are major errors on the final answer without proper workings. There are major presentation and organisation errors. |
Basic calculations supported by few formula. There are major errors on workings and final answers. Presentation and organisation errors are visible. |
Good calculations with formula but with errors on workings and final answers. Good presentation but with mistakes on organisation and structure. |
Very good calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Very good presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Excellent calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Excellent presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Outstanding calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Outstanding presentation and organisation of calculations. |
Exceptional calculations supported by necessary formula, workings and accurate final answer. Exceptional presentation and organisation of calculations. |
| Discussion of the decision – 10 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to summarise the assessment task; very poor synthesis of the assessment task; very weak summary of the points presented; very weak position on the points raised |
Poor synthesis of the assessment task; weak summary of the points presented; weak position on the points raised |
Satisfactory synthesis of the assessment task; satisfactory summary of the points presented; unclear position on the points raised |
Good synthesis of the assessment task; good summary of the points presented; clear position on the points raised |
Very good synthesis of the points of the assessment task; very good summary of the evidences; strong position on the points raised |
Excellent synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; excellent summary of the evidences presented; profound position on the main points raised |
Outstanding synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; outstanding summary of the evidences presented; profound position on the main points raised |
Exceptional synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; exceptional summary of the evidences presented; profound position on the main points raised |
| Preparation of summary report – 5 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to summarise the assessment task; very poor synthesis of the assessment |
Poor synthesis of the assessment task; weak summary of the points presented; |
Satisfactory synthesis of the assessment task; satisfactory summary of the points |
Good synthesis of the assessment task; good summary of the points presented; |
Very good synthesis of the points of the assessment task; very good summary of the evidences; strong position |
Excellent synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; excellent summary of the evidences presented; |
Outstanding synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; outstanding summary of the evidences |
Exceptional synthesis of the main points of the assessment task; exceptional summary of the evidences |
Pg. 14 Version 1
| task; very weak summary of the points presented; very weak position on the points raised |
weak position on the points raised |
presented; unclear position on the points raised |
clear position on the points raised |
on the points raised |
profound position on the main points raised |
presented; profound position on the main points raised |
presented; profound position on the main points raised |
||
| Discussion on the implications of the CEO’s actions – 5 marks |
No answer given or a totally irrelevant answer. |
An attempt to examine thecase but no originality; very poor organisation of ideas; very poor analysis of arguments; no details and evidences; no theories used to address the issue |
Poor examination of the case with no originality; ideas are not organised; poor analysis of arguments; very limited concepts with no relevant evidences; limited theories to address issues |
Basic examination of the case with limited originality; ideas not properly organised; basic analysis with limited arguments; compare contrast concepts with limited details and evidences; limited use of theories to address issues |
Good examination of the case with originality; organised ideas; organised arguments; compare contrast concepts supported by details; distinguish theories to address issues |
Very good examination of the case with perception and originality; organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details; distinguish theories with evidences to address issues. |
Excellent examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
Outstanding examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues |
Exceptional examination of the case with a high degree of perception and originality; highly organised thoughts and ideas; analysis displays a strong and well organised arguments; compare contrast and differentiation of concepts supported by relevant details and evidences; distinguish relevant theories with related evidences to address issues. |
The post GAC5010 Performance Management appeared first on My Assignment Online.