FIT5205 2018 Assignment 3 Part 2
Marking Guide On-campus students
| Analysis of the themes and issues |
Very Good – Demonstrates insight and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the themes and issues. Good – Demonstrates some awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of themes and issues. Satisfactory – Demonstrates a sound knowledge of the themes and issues. Needs Improvement – Demonstrates a basic understanding of the themes and issues. Unsatisfactory – A basic understanding of the themes and issues is not demonstrated |
| Explanation of the findings |
Very Good – Excellent explanation of the findings. Good – Good explanation of the findings. Satisfactory – The findings are not clearly explained. Needs Improvement – The focus of the analysis is not clearly explained; the findings are not explained. Unsatisfactory – The findings are not discussed or are not relevant to the case study and themes. |
| Recommendations that address the stakeholder needs and are based on the findings |
Very Good – Demonstrates insight and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the various stakeholders and their needs. Recommendations are clearly related to the findings. Good – Demonstrates some awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the various stakeholders and their needs. Recommendations are related to the findings. Satisfactory – Demonstrates a sound knowledge of the various stakeholders and their needs. Recommendations are related to the findings. Needs Improvement – Demonstrates a basic understanding of the various stakeholders and their needs. The recommendations are not clearly related to the findings. Unsatisfactory – A basic understanding of the various stakeholders and their needs is not demonstrated. No recommendations. |
| Research effort and effective use of a range of sources |
Very Good – Evidence of extensive research and use of a wide range of relevant sources. Good – Evidence of research beyond the key references and use of a large number of relevant sources. Satisfactory – Use of several resources including key references. Needs Improvement – Use of a small number of sources sources, or sources that are not relevant to the case study. Unsatisfactory – No references or use of sources that are not relevant to the case study. |
| Cohesion of the group report |
Very Good – Evidence of extensive collaboration, cohesive report. Good – Evidence of collaboration, reasonably coherent report. Satisfactory – Some evidence of collaboration, agreement on the main issues. Needs Improvement – Little evidence of collaboration; the parts of the reports do not fit well together. Unsatisfactory – No collaboration, disjointed report. |
| Quality of written Submission |
Very Good – Well structured and well written. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Excellent use of references. Good – Clear structure and good writing style. Mostly correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Good referencing. Satisfactory – Reasonable structure and writing style. Grammar, spelling and punctuation could do with more work. Adequate referencing Needs Improvement – Your writing is a little disorganised and disjointed. Grammar, spelling and punctuation errors detract from your work. Referencing needs work. Unsatisfactory – Disorganised and aimless writing. Grammar, spelling and punctuation errors make it difficult to read. Referencing needs substantive work. |
| Feedback | Comments: |
| Grade | Group mark HD D C P N |
| Individual mark HD D C P N |
On
track
Needs
work
In danger
Your ability to address the
assignment criteria is
Your written communication
skills are
Your citation and
referencing skills are
The post FIT5205 2018 Assignment 3 appeared first on My Assignment Online.
Plagiarism Free Assignment Help
Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms
✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers
✓ Deadline from 3 hours
✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included
✓ Unlimited free revisions
✓ Free to submit — compare quotes