These papers should not simply be a partisan platform to express your frustration with the current cultural or political climate. Instead, they should be probing analyses of the texts and the lessons we should draw from them. Be sure to cite appropriately (APA or Chicago is fine, or any recognized style will do). Please adhere to university expectations concerning academic honesty and integrity. Be sure to read our policy on plagiarism which is available on the syllabus. Also, be sure to have fun! Dive into these texts as Im certain you will rarely get an opportunity to do it again! For this paper, I would like you to reflect on the role of the intellectual or philosopher in public affairs. As we saw in the Euthyphro, the Apology of Socrates, the Crito, and The Republic, Plato urges us to consider how the general public often does not appreciate the value of philosophy. While in Aristophanes Clouds, we see a dismissive attitude to the veneration of intellectuals and the importance of the philosophic life. Where, exactly, do you see a contrast between Platos and Aristophanes views of the philosophic life? How do you see the role of intellectuals in public affairs? What are the implications of your view for democracy? While this paper is relatively short (4-7 pages) be sure to show a general understanding of the thinkers and texts weve covered in class. Be sure to get straight to the point in your papers. Be concise, coherent, and surgical in your approach to answering the prompt.
The post partisan platform to express your frustration appeared first on My Assignment Online.