Rubric Detail
Top of Form
Name: Personal SWOT Analysis Rubric
- Grid View
- List View
| Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Does Not Meet Expectations | No Effort | |
| Uses assessment results and reflection in Part 1 to identify personal strengths/weaknesses considering both your perspective and the view others may have of you. | Points:
25 (25.00%) Provides personal perspective of assessments to identify strengths & weaknesses; considers views of others in relationship to strengths/weaknesses identified. Feedback: |
Points:
20 (20.00%) Provides personal perspective of assessments to identify strengths & weaknesses; but does not consider view of others in relationship to strengths & weaknesses identified. Feedback: |
Points:
15 (15.00%) Provides limited perspective of assessments; does not consider view of others; does not clearly demonstrate relationship of assessment to strengths & weaknesses. Feedback: |
Points:
0 (0.00%) Narrative not attempted; or does not reflect comparison of assessment results to strengths & weaknesses. Feedback: |
| Uses matrix format for SWOT Analysis in Part 2, correctly identifying all entries into appropriate categories. (i.e.: strengths correctly identified and placed in strength category). | Points:
25 (25.00%) Uses SWOT matrix correctly; identifies and places all entries into appropriate categories. Feedback: |
Points:
20 (20.00%) ses SWOT matrix for analysis; places most entries into appropriate categories. Feedback: |
Points:
10 (10.00%) Attempts SWOT matrix; but does not consistently place entries into appropriate categories. Feedback: |
Points:
0 (0.00%) Does not attempt SWOT matrix; or fails to place any entries in appropriate categories. Feedback: |
| SWOT Analysis demonstrates relationship between strengths/weaknesses assessment in Part1 AND identified opportunities/ threats. | Points:
25 (25.00%) SWOT clearly demonstrates relationship between strength/weakness assessment AND identified opportunities/ threats. Feedback: |
Points:
20 (20.00%) SWOT shows relationship between strength /weakness assessment AND identified opportunities/ threats; a few entries lack clarity. Feedback: |
Points:
15 (15.00%) SWOT attempts to show relationship between how strength /weakness assessment AND identified opportunities /threats; most entries lack Feedback: |
Points:
0 (0.00%) Does not attempt; or fails to demonstrate use of assessment in SWOT Analysis. Feedback: |
| Structure, Grammar, Spelling, APA, Timeliness, on time & adheres to submission length. | Points:
25 (25.00%) Well organized, easy to follow Grammatically correct No spelling errors APA citations/references utilized correct On time & adheres to submission length. Feedback: |
Points:
20 (20.00%) Needs some improvement with organization 1-2 Grammar errors 1-2 spelling errors APA citations/references have 1-2 errors On time & adheres to submission length. Feedback: |
Points:
10 (10.00%) Lacks organization; illogical flow; difficult to read> 2 Grammar errors> 2 spelling errors APA citations/ references >2 errors Late or does not adhere to submission length. Feedback: |
Points:
0 (0.00%) No attempt or does not provide references / citations. Feedback: |
Show DescriptionsShow Feedback
Uses assessment results and reflection in Part 1 to identify personal strengths/weaknesses considering both your perspective and the view others may have of you.—
Levels of Achievement:
Exceeds Expectations 25 (25.00%) points
Provides personal perspective of assessments to identify strengths & weaknesses; considers views of others in relationship to strengths/weaknesses identified.
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
Provides personal perspective of assessments to identify strengths & weaknesses; but does not consider view of others in relationship to strengths & weaknesses identified.
Does Not Meet Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Provides limited perspective of assessments; does not consider view of others; does not clearly demonstrate relationship of assessment to strengths & weaknesses.
No Effort 0 (0.00%) points
Narrative not attempted; or does not reflect comparison of assessment results to strengths & weaknesses.
Feedback:
Uses matrix format for SWOT Analysis in Part 2, correctly identifying all entries into appropriate categories. (i.e.: strengths correctly identified and placed in strength category).—
Levels of Achievement:
Exceeds Expectations 25 (25.00%) points
Uses SWOT matrix correctly; identifies and places all entries into appropriate categories.
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
ses SWOT matrix for analysis; places most entries into appropriate categories.
Does Not Meet Expectations 10 (10.00%) points
Attempts SWOT matrix; but does not consistently place entries into appropriate categories.
No Effort 0 (0.00%) points
Does not attempt SWOT matrix; or fails to place any entries in appropriate categories.
Feedback:
SWOT Analysis demonstrates relationship between strengths/weaknesses assessment in Part1 AND identified opportunities/ threats.—
Levels of Achievement:
Exceeds Expectations 25 (25.00%) points
SWOT clearly demonstrates relationship between strength/weakness assessment AND identified opportunities/ threats.
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
SWOT shows relationship between strength /weakness assessment AND identified opportunities/ threats; a few entries lack clarity.
Does Not Meet Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
SWOT attempts to show relationship between how strength /weakness assessment AND identified opportunities /threats; most entries lack
No Effort 0 (0.00%) points
Does not attempt; or fails to demonstrate use of assessment in SWOT Analysis.
Feedback:
Structure, Grammar, Spelling, APA, Timeliness, on time & adheres to submission length.—
Levels of Achievement:
Exceeds Expectations 25 (25.00%) points
Well organized, easy to follow Grammatically correct No spelling errors APA citations/references utilized correct On time & adheres to submission length.
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
Needs some improvement with organization 1-2 Grammar errors 1-2 spelling errors APA citations/references have 1-2 errors On time & adheres to submission length.
Does Not Meet Expectations 10 (10.00%) points
Lacks organization; illogical flow; difficult to read> 2 Grammar errors> 2 spelling errors APA citations/ references >2 errors Late or does not adhere to submission length.
No Effort 0 (0.00%) points
No attempt or does not provide references / citations.
Feedback:
Name:Personal SWOT Analysis Rubric
Bottom of Form
The post SWOT ANALYSIS appeared first on Best Custom Essay Writing Services | EssayBureau.com.