Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now

MBA401 People, culture and contemporary leadership

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Information

Subject Code: MBA401
Subject Name: People, culture and contemporary leadership
Assessment Title: Assessment 2 – Reflective Essay
Weighting: 40%
Total Marks:
Word-count:
40
2,000 words
Due Date: Monday of week 9 at 11.55pm via Turnitin

Assessment Objective
The objective of this assessment task is to write a reflective essay that includes discussion of
what and how you have learnt, what you have done or experienced, and how this learning
applies to the theories and concepts of leadership that you have been exposed to.
A reflective essay is an academic analysis of your own experience. It still follows academic
conventions, for instance, it is structured with a beginning, middle, and end, and it should have a
logical series of paragraphs.
It is a self-analysis where you need to critically reflect on thoughts, feelings and actions, then
integrate these reflections with the theoretical concepts. A reflective essay should be written in
both the first and third person.
Assessment Process

Throughout this subject you have been exposed to various perspectives on leaders,
leadership and the impact on organisations.
You have also participated in numerous group activities in class, as well as undertaking
questionnaires and psychometric assessments.
Throughout the course, you have been encouraged to keep a reflective journal which you
should now draw upon to write a reflective essay.

 You are required to answer the following question:

What type of leader am I and what are the key areas that I need to improve to become
more effective?

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Using Gibb’s (1988) framework of reflective learning is a useful starting point:
Your reflective essay should include:


A clear introduction defining scope.
A brief discussion of what leadership is, including any appropriate theory related to
leadership.
A discussion of the questionnaires completed, and what these mean for you as a leader.
A discussion of the class activities you were part of, and what these mean for you as a
leader.
A clear articulation of what your own development areas are, why they are and what you
could undertake to improve them.
A clear conclusion that summarizes your leadership.
A reference list.
An appendix that shows any questionnaires and psychometric assessments you have
done including your own results.
An appendix that shows a 1-page example from your learning journal.



Further guidance:

You should include a minimum of 10 references. At least 6 of these should be academic
journals. The rest can be textbooks and appropriate websites.
You should adopt the Harvard referencing convention throughout your essay as well as in
the reference list at the end.
It is recommended that you use the structure outlined above and adopt sub-headings
based on each bullet point.
The marking rubrics attached guide the marker when awarding marks for your essay. You
should review your paper in line with this to ensure there is nothing you have missed.
It is important to check your similarity in turnitin. All sentences highlighted must be either
paraphrased in your own words or put in quotes and referenced accordingly. You should
be aiming for as low a similarity score as you can. Similarity highlighted in a contents page,
reference list or appendices is nothing to be concerned about.
Some useful resources for reflecting writing include:
• https://student.unsw.edu.au/reflective-writing

• http://libraryguides.griffith.edu.au/c.php?g=57829&p=379449
• http://learnonline.canberra.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=180720&chapterid=470
• https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/reflective-journal-1
• http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/education/reflective-writing/4.xml
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Criteria F (Fail)
0%-49%
P (Pass)
50%-64%
CR (Credit)
65%-74%
D (Distinction)
75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85%-100%
Mark
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS
Introduction and Conclusion Provide poor context and does
not link to the assessment in a
clear and coherent way. May
be missing entirely.
Provide satisfactory context but
link to the assessment in only a
partially clear and coherent way.
Provide reasonable context
and link to the assessment in
a fairly clear and coherent
way.
Provide good context and link to
the assessment in a clear and
coherent way.
Provide excellent context and link
to the assessment in an extremely
clear and coherent way.
/10
Discussion of what Leadership
is
A poor definition of leadership
that is based on no expressly
stated academic theory.
Discussion of how the
definition will link to the
reflective content that follows is
not made.
A satisfactory definition of
leadership that is based on
described academic theory.
Discussion of how the definition
will link to the reflective content
that follows is limited.
A solid definition of leadership
that is based on relevant
academic theory. Discussion
of how the definition will link to
the reflective content that
follows is occasionally made.
A clear definition of leadership
that is based on sound
academic theory. Discussion of
how the definition will link to the
reflective content that follows is
sufficiently described.
An extremely clear definition of
leadership that is based on well
articulated academic theory.
Discussion of how the definition
will link to the reflective content
that follows is expressly stated
and unambiguous.
/10
Discussion of questionnaires
and implications of results
Questionnaires are poorly
described and their purpose,
use and validity are not
outlined and based on
academic theory. Results are
not significantly discussed nor
done so using any personal
reflections or powerful insights.
Questionnaires are satisfactorily
described but their purpose, use
and validity are based on limited
academic theory. Results are
discussed but done so using
limited personal reflections and
insights.
Questionnaires are well
described and their purpose,
use and validity are partially
outlined and based on some
academic theory. Results are
well discussed and done so
using some personal
reflections and some insights.
Questionnaires are very well
described and their purpose,
use and validity are mainly
based on academic theory.
Results are very well discussed
and done so by consistently
using personal reflections and
well described insights.
Questionnaires are meticulously
described and their purpose, use
and validity are all outlined and
based on academic theory.
Results are comprehensively
discussed and done so using
personal reflections and powerful
insights.
/20
Discussion of class activities
and implications of them
Class activities are poorly
described and their purpose
not discussed. Learnings are
not significantly discussed nor
done so using any personal
reflections or powerful insights.
Class activities are satisfactorily
described and their purpose
discussed. Learnings are
discussed but done so using
limited personal reflections and
powerful insights.
Class activities are well
described and their purpose
discussed. Learnings are well
discussed and done so using
some personal reflections and
some convincing insights.
Class activities are very well
described and their purpose
discussed. Learnings are very
well discussed and done so
using personal reflections and
thoroughly described insights.
Class activities are meticulously
described and their purpose
discussed. Learnings are
comprehensively discussed and
done so using personal reflections
and powerful insights.
/15
Discussion of leadership
development areas and a plan
to improve
Own leadership development
areas are poorly described. A
structured plan is not
evidenced that contains any
real actionable objectives. A
very limited degree of self
awareness is present in the
discussion.
Own leadership development
areas are partially described. A
structured plan is evidenced that
contains a small number of
actionable objectives. A limited
degree of self-awareness is
present in the discussion.
Own leadership development
areas are well described. A
structured plan is evidenced
that contains some actionable
objectives. A good degree of
self-awareness is present in
the discussion.
Own leadership development
areas are very well described. A
structured plan is evidenced that
contains a high number
actionable objectives. A high
degree of self-awareness is
present in the discussion.
Own leadership development
areas are thoroughly and
insightfully described. A
structured plan is evidenced that
contains fully actionable
objectives. An extremely high
degree of self-awareness is
present in the discussion.
/30

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Structure Format and Presentation (Consistent across all courses) OUT OF 20 MARKS
Appropriate theory and
research used to answer
question posed.
Answer unsatisfactorily
incorporates, integrates and
applies theory and research.
Answer satisfactorily
incorporates but only minimally
integrates and applies theory
and research.
Answer partially incorporates,
integrates and applies theory
and research.
Answer predominantly
incorporates, integrates and
applies theory and research.
Answer skillfully incorporates,
integrates and applies theory and
research.
/5
Correct academic writing style
used, including correct
spelling, grammar and
punctuation.
Writing quality is an inadequate
standard with substantial
errors.
Writing quality is a reasonable
standard with moderate errors.
Writing quality is a good
standard with some errors.
Writing quality is a high standard
with minimal errors.
Writing quality is of an impeccable
standard with no errors.
/5
In-text referencing and
reference list follows Harvard
style and consistent with KBS
guidelines.
Frequent errors and/or
inconsistent application of
Harvard referencing
conventions.
Some errors and/or inconsistent
application of Harvard
referencing conventions.
A few errors and/or
inconsistent application of
Harvard referencing
conventions.
Minimal errors and/or
inconsistent application of
Harvard referencing
conventions.
No errors and/or inconsistent
application of Harvard referencing
conventions.
/5
Comments: /85
/15
/100

The post MBA401 People, culture and contemporary leadership appeared first on My Assignment Online.

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers ✓ Deadline from 3 hours ✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included ✓ Unlimited free revisions ✓ Free to submit — compare quotes
Scroll to Top