Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 1 of 10
| Instructions to Student | |
| General Instructions/information for the students for completing the assignment | |
| | Answer all questions. |
| |
Deadline of submission: 05/07/2020; 23:59 The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage of the assignment which is 50 marks Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date. Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 12/07/2020 |
| | |
| |
Module Learning Outcomes
The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully
1. Demonstrate understanding of the common methods of civil engineering construction.
2. Demonstrate understanding of the capabilities and limits of civil engineering equipment.
Assignment Objective
The major objectives of this coursework assignment are:
to understand common construction methods of civil engineering construction.
to be familiar with capabilities of plant and their limitations of usage in Oman.
Assignment Tasks
Student has to be considered him/herself as a site personnel of a construction company in Oman.
In this task student need to identify required dewatering techniques according to the site
conditions. Additionally, student should handle the responsibility of managing construction plant
at site and basic foundation design of a G+3 storey residential building in Al Mabelah.
Note: Individual student data is provided in a separate sheet, please consider values provided
at your ID and Name for the purpose of required calculations. It is mentioned as xx wherever
you need to check for individual student data.
Your solutions shall be as per site situations provided below:
| IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT) | |
| Module Code: CIVL 0003 | Module Name: CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 1 |
| Level: 1 | Max. Marks: 100 |
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 2 of 10
1. Ground water control methods:
From the analysis of site and soil investigation reports, it was observed that ground
consists of water below at the depth of 7m. The ground condition is not suitable for the
well point system. At any cost, water has to be dewatered at the construction site and
there is not restriction on amount to be spent to implement the required dewatering
method but must be an effective method to dewater which can substantially increase the
rate of water extraction in cohesive soils, such as clay.
According to the ground conditions, student should recommend any TWO temporary
dewatering methods to lower the ground water table which are best suitable to given
situations of the construction site.
2. Output of the construction plant team:
It is required to excavate 10,000m3 of soil and the material is ‘SANDY CLAY’.
Find out bulking factor and bucket fill factor that should be applied.
(Table 5.3 Bulk density and Bulking factors – Dene, R. W 1996, Earthworks, Pg:105)
(Table 5.4 – typical bucket fill factors Dene, R. W 1996, Earthworks, Pg:105)
Available construction plant for this project is:
a) 360° excavator with a bucket of heaped capacity 0.XX m3 & typical cycle time is half a
minute.
b) Trucks with XX m3 capacity which require 2 minutes to position itself under the 360°
excavator (positioning time).
Lorry work cycle is:
| Lorry work cycle (excluding Loading time of truck) | |
| Moving off site | 1 minute |
| Travel 2.5 km (say) each way (at 30 km/hr.) | 10 minutes |
| Tipping time | 3 minutes |
According to the data and site circumstances student should:
i. Calculate the output of the 360° excavator per week, assuming a normal working week
| of 40 hours which includes down time of 10 minutes in every hour. | (15 marks) |
| ii. Determine the ‘Plant Team’ and ‘Number of Weeks’ required for the removal of | |
| 10000m3 of soil. | (15 marks) |
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 3 of 10
3. Capacity calculation of a compaction plant:
A self- propelled single drum ‘Vibrating Roller, has:
Roller width 2.50 m;
Mass per wheel is XXXX kg/m width of roller
Speed X.X km/hr.;
Type of soil which has to be compacted is “Cohesive soil (clay)”
From Compaction Specification; (Table 5.5 Compaction specification–Earthworks, Pg:111]
Hence students should:
i. Determine minimum number of passes and maximum depth of compacted layer in mm.
(5 marks)
ii. Determine the volume of soil handled per week by this Vibrating Roller based on
limitations and capabilities provided. (10 marks)
4. Effective length and Allowable pile load.
From the structural design it is identified that the load on pile is around XXX kN in clay of
average cohesion XXX kN/m2. There are three metres of soft peat above the clay. It is
recommended to be a friction bearing pile, in the clay with some form of plastic sleeve
over the top three metres to prevent negative skin friction.
In line with the data student should:
| i. Determine allowable pile load, Using Skempton’s formula. | (10 marks) |
| Where, α = Adhesion factor (assume 0.48 for clay) and Factor of safety as 2.5 ii. Determine the diameter of the pile (200mm – 400mm), actual length (8m – 30m) and |
|
| effective length (5m – 27m) of a pile to cover the applied load. | (5 marks) |
To accomplish above mentioned tasks, students shall:
Investigate on various construction methods such as dewatering, earthworks, foundation etc.
which are being implemented in Oman.
Investigate capabilities and limitations of construction plant being used in Oman.
Collect required information through authorised textbooks, official websites.
Student shall also perform scholarly study through text books and e-library resources.
Prepare an Individual report according to report sections mentioned below.
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 4 of 10
Report Sections:
1. Introduction [maximum 100 words]
Student shall start with a brief overview and introduction to the report. Student must provide
significance of earthwork, ground water control and capabilities and limitations of construction
plant.
Distribution of marks for below sections are provided at assignment tasks in detail
2. Ground water control methods [maximum 200 words]
3. Output of construction plant team [variable, Maximum 300 words]
4. Capacity calculation of a compaction plant [variable, Maximum 150 words]
5. Effective length and Allowable pile load [variable, Maximum 150 words]
6. Conclusion [maximum 50 words]
Student shall provide overall recommendations through the knowledge pursued through this
coursework. Student must discuss outcomes of this coursework through the knowledge gained
from various tasks of this study.
7. References – CU Harvard style referencing format
Student must provide respective citations and references as per CU Harvard referencing style.
Minimum 5 references 2 e-library and 3 general references
Rules & Regulations:
| |
All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. |
| | |
| |
Guidelines:
Assignment must be computer typed.
| |
Font – Times New Roman Font – Style – Regular Font – Size – 12 Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline. |
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 5 of 10
| |
Provide suitable diagrams/images/photos wherever required. Each student has to do the assignment individually. You can refer books in e-Library or use internet resources. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources. Recommended textbooks to be used for this coursework: Warren, Dene R (1996) Civil Engineering Construction, Design and Management, Macmillan. |
| o |
o Chudley R and Greeno R (2005) Building Construction Handbook (10th ed), Routledge,
N.Y U.S.A.
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation
of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of
violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1. Plagiarism
2. Malpractice
3. Ghost Writing
4. Collusion
5. Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the
student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of
plagiarism.
1. Plagiarism
A. First offence of plagiarism
I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in
any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of
deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed.
| II. | Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be |
| III. |
awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one
week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 6 of 10
B. Second offence of plagiarism
If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a
subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism
is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of
suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling
session in such cases.
2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module
and shall be required to re-register the module
B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for
an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student
shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign
an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases.
3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation
If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as
recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic
Affairs.
4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level
academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs.
5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases”
mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an
institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The
committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take
appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation
which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 7 of 10
6. Types/Variations of Cases:
| I. | If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be |
| II. | |
| III. |
applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the
policy will then be applied to all the students of the group.
| IV. | If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: |
| a. | If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group |
will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be
applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted
as per the policy.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual
assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that
student alone.
c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment.
* for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:
It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment. The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 8 of 10
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time
if required.
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly, the
following shall apply.
Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only
for the intended purpose of research.
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 9 of 10
Assessment Evaluation Criteria
| Classification And % Range <to be given as per requirement> |
Reflection and critical analysis. | Knowledge and Understanding/ Application of Theory |
Evidence of Reading | Referencing and Bibliography |
Presentation, Grammar and Spelling |
| Outstanding | Highly competent analytical skills and reflective practice, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values and principles and professional development planning. |
Extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice. |
Evidence of reading an extensive range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. |
Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style |
Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross-referencing and links to supporting evidence |
| Excellent | Strong analytical skills and reflective practice used, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. |
Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts and /or excellent knowledge and understanding of the application of theory in practice |
Evidence of reading a wide range of educational literature/research and where applicable, workplace strategies, policies and procedures. |
Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style |
Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling, clear and easy to use links to supporting evidence |
| Very Good Quality | Good use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. |
Good knowledge or key principles and concepts and/or good knowledge of the application of theory in practice |
Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. |
Generally well referenced with correct use of the appropriate referencing style |
Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence |
| Good (Acceptable) |
Acceptable use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. |
Acceptable knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or knowledge of the application of theory in practice |
Evidence of reading an appropriate range of educational literature/research and where applicable, relevant workplace policies and procedures |
Adequate referencing. Generally accurate use of appropriate referencing style |
Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence |
| Adequate/ Satisfactory |
Adequate use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. |
Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or satisfactory evidence of the application of theory in practice. |
Evidence of minimal reading of educational literature/research and where applicable relevant workplace policies and procedures |
Adequate referencing. Appropriate referencing style used but may contain some inaccuracies. |
Weak presentation , satisfactory structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence |
| Weak /Poor (all learning outcomes not adequately met) |
Little use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and/or professional development planning. Professional values and principles not reflected in the submission. and/or Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and professional development planning |
Little evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or little evidence of the application of theory in practice and/or No evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or no evidence of application of theory in practice |
Little or no evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant work place policies and procedures and/or No evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant workplace policies and procedures |
Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of appropriate referencing style |
Poor presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence and/or Unacceptable presentation, grammar and spelling, structure is very poor, links to supporting evidence |
Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment 2) – A & B – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 10 of 10
Marking Criteria
(Assignment 2 – CIVL 0003)
| S.No | Task | Weak /Poor (< 50%) |
Adequate/ Satisfactory (50-69)% |
Good (Acceptable) (70-76)% |
Very Good Quality (77-83)% |
Excellent (84-90) % |
Out standing (>91%) |
Max Marks |
Obtained marks |
| REPORT SECTIONS | |||||||||
| 1 | Introduction [10 marks] | ||||||||
| Significance of earthwork, ground water control and construction plant. |
10 | ||||||||
| Ground water control methods [20 marks] | |||||||||
| 2 | Dewatering method – 1 | 10 | |||||||
| Dewatering method – 2 | 10 | ||||||||
| 3 | Output of the construction plant team [30 marks] | ||||||||
| Output of the 360° excavator per week | 15 | ||||||||
| Determination of Plant Team and number of weeks |
15 | ||||||||
| 4 | Capacity calculation of a compaction plant [15 marks] | ||||||||
| Minimum number of passes and minimum depth of compacted layer |
5 | ||||||||
| Volume of soil handled per week | 10 | ||||||||
| 5 | Effective length and Allowable pile load [15 marks] | ||||||||
| Determination of allowable pile load | 10 | ||||||||
| Diameter of the pile, actual length and effective length |
5 | ||||||||
| 6 | Conclusion [5 marks] | ||||||||
| Overall recommendations through the knowledge pursued through this study |
5 | ||||||||
| 7 | References – CU Harvard style [5 marks] | ||||||||
| e-library references (2) | 2 | ||||||||
| General references(3) | 3 | ||||||||
| Total | 100 | ||||||||
| Penalty, if any (-) | |||||||||
| Final marks | 100 | ||||||||
| Scaled to 50% | 50 |
The post Civil Engineering Construction 1 (CIVL 0003) appeared first on My Assignment Online.