1. Search the web for news on computer security breaches that occurred during April-August 2015-2018. Research one such reported incident. Prepare a report focusing on what the problem was, how and why it occurred and what are the possible solutions

Part A: 30 Marks

Answer the following questions:

  1. Search the web for news on computer security breaches that occurred during April-August 2015-2018. Research one such reported incident. Prepare a report focusing on what the problem was, how and why it occurred and what are the possible solutions. – 15 Marks

Length: Around 800 words

  1. Explain why asynchronous I/O activity is a problem with many memory protection schemes, including base/bounds and paging. Suggest a solution to the problem. – 15 Marks

Length: Around 600 words

Part B: 20 Marks

  1. Research the 2011 Sony PlayStation Network outage case on the web and prepare a report focusing on the following questions:
  • What was the problem?
  • Who were affected and how?
  • How was the attack carried out?
  • What could have been done to prevent the attack?

 

Length: Around 900 words

Rationale

This assessment task is based on the following topics discussed in the subject: the overview of Information security fundamentals, security threats, cryptography, malicious software and its countermeasures, operating system security and software security .

The assessment task is aligned with the following learning outcomes of the subject:

On successful completion of this subject, students will

  • be able to justify security goals and the importance of maintaining the secure computing environment against digital threats;
  • be able to explain the fundamental concepts of cryptographic algorithms;
  • be able to examine malicious activities that may affect the security of a computer program and justify the choice of various controls to mitigate threats.
  • be able to compare and contrast the security mechanisms of a trusted operating system with those used in a general purpose operating system;

 

 

Marking criteria

 

Assessment criteria
PART A : 30 marks
Assessable Components HD 100% – 85% DI 84% – 75% CR 74% – 65% PS 64% – 50% FL 49% – 0
 

Q.1 (15 marks)

 

Search the web for news on computer security breaches that occurred during April-August 2015-2018. Research one such reported incident. Prepare a report focusing on what the problem was, how and why it occurred and what are the possible solutions.

 

1.                   Comprehensive report addressing all criteria. Evidence of indepth research.

(Value: 95%)

2.                   Referenced a wide range of appropriate sources.

Referencing style correctly used. (Value: 5%)

 

1.                   Comprehensive report addressing all criteria. Evidence of in-depth research. Minor omissions only.

(Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Referenced a range of appropriate sources. Referencing style correctly used.

Minor errors only. (Value: 5%)

 

1.                   Mostly wellresearched and wellpresented report addressing all

criteria. Some omissions. (Value: 95%)

2.                   Referenced a range of appropriate sources.

 

Referencing style correctly used. Some errors and omissions. (Value: 5%)

 

1.                   Partially complete report addressing most of the criteria. Evidence of research. Some omissions. (Value: 95%)

2.                   Referenced some appropriate sources.

 

Referencing style mostly correctly used. Some errors and omissions. (Value: 5%)

 

1.                   Major omissions or incorrect answers. (Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Either no evidence of

literature being consulted or cited references irrelevant to the assignment set. Major errors in referencing style.

(Value: 5%)

Possible marks 15.0 – 12.75 12.6 – 11.25 11.10 – 9.75 9.60 – 7.5 7.35 – 0
Q.2 (15 marks)

 

Explain why asynchronous I/O activity is a problem with many memory protection schemes, including base/bounds and paging. Suggest a solution to the problem.

 

1.                   Correct and in depth explanation of the problem.

 

Viable solution provided with complete details.

(Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Supporting reference/(s); fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with proper in text citation.

(Value: 5%)

1.                   Comprehensive and correct explanation of the problem.

 

Viable solution provided with complete details.

 

Very minor omissions only.

(Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Supporting reference/(s); fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with proper in text citation. (Value: 5%)

1.                   Correct explanation of the problem with some details.

 

Viable solution provided.

 

Some omissions.

(Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Supporting reference/(s); fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with proper in text citation.

Minor omissions. (Value: 5%)

1.                   Mostly correct explanation and solution.

 

Minor errors.

(Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Supporting reference/(s); writing style appropriate to assignment with proper in text citation. Some omissions. (Value: 5%)

1.                   Major omissions or incorrect answers. (Value: 95%)

 

2.                   Either no evidence of

literature being consulted or cited references irrelevant to the assessment set. Major errors in referencing style.

(Value: 5%)

 

Possible marks 15.0 – 12.75 12.6 – 11.25 11.10 – 9.75 9.60 – 7.5 7.35 – 0
PART B: 20 marks
Q.1 (20 marks)

 

1. Comprehensive  

1. Comprehensive

 

1. Mostly well-

 

1. Partially

 

1. Major

Research the 2011 Sony PlayStation Network outage case on the web and prepare a report focusing on the following questions:

•       What was the problem?

•       Who were

affected and how?

•       How was the

attack carried out?

•       What could

have been done to prevent the attack?

report addressing all criteria. Evidence of in-depth research.

(Value: 95%)

 

2. Referenced a wide range of appropriate sources.

Referencing style correctly used. (Value: 5%)

 

report addressing all criteria. Evidence of in-depth research. Minor omissions only.

(Value: 95%)

 

2. Referenced a range of appropriate sources. Referencing style correctly used.

Minor errors only. (Value: 5%)

researched and wellpresented report addressing all

criteria. Some omissions. (Value: 95%)

 

2. Referenced a range of appropriate sources.

 

Referencing style correctly used. Some errors and omissions. (Value: 5%)

complete report addressing most of the criteria. Evidence of research. Some omissions. (Value: 95%)

 

2. Referenced some appropriate sources.

 

Referencing style mostly correctly used. Some errors and omissions. (Value: 5%)

omissions or incorrect answers. (Value: 95%)

 

2. Either no evidence of

literature being consulted or cited references irrelevant to the assignment set. Major errors in referencing style.

(Value: 5%)

Possible marks 20.0 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.4 – 0

 

Presentation

  • You are recommended to write the answers in a word document and submit. You can also submit your document in pdf format as well.
  • Your answers to the questions should be precise but complete and informative.
  • Each question should be answered individually with the corresponding label to indicate the tasks completed e.g. Task 1 a.
  • A cover page must be included and should contain relevant identifying information.

 

 

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?
Scroll to Top