[Research Topic]
WriteMYProject
[Name]
[Student ID]
[Word count]
Brief introduction (up to 100 words)
Search strategy [approximately 200 words – not included in word count]
Overview
Articles obtained through this process should be qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research conducted with the population group identified in your Task 2 topic. All articles obtained should be peer-reviewed and published in the last eight (8) years.
Content
This section should containa summary of search strategy and tables documenting your search strategy.
The summary of search strategy should be a written paragraph which contains the research question, search terms and key words used to search for this topic, a statement about the yield, a statement research articles selected.
The tables documenting this strategy should contain:
Your research question in PICO format (you can use PICO format to develop this)
Key words and phrases
Table of synonyms and variant words
Table containing names of databases searched and search yield.
Table with the name of the eight (8) studies obtained for this report. If you locate articles using a reference list or using a function of a database that identifies similar topics, you should document this using Table 5.
The components of your question in PICO format (if applicable for developing research question)
P Patient/Population
I Intervention
C Comparison
O Outcome
Record Key Words and Phrases
Keyword 1
Keyword 2
Keyword 3
Keyword 4
Table of synonyms and variant words
Keyword 1
Keyword 2
Keyword 3
Keyword 4
Table containing names of databases searched and search yield
Database
Search term
Search yield
Number of articles selected for this report
Table 5. Summary of research articles obtained in search process
Article
Location obtained from
Reference to article 1 [Vancouver]
e.g Handpicked from Scopus
Literature Review and answerable research question [1100 words]
This section should contain:
An introduction to your topic (approx. 200 – 250 words)
A literature review and synthesis of the articles located in the search
an identified gap based on the literature reviewed
a research question to address the gap
Quality of evidence [800 words]
This section should contain:
A 400-word description of the quality of a quantitative study located in your search and
A 400-word description of the quality of a qualitative study located in your search
The following table provided prompts to develop a 400-word description of the quality of both a qualitative and quantitative article selected from your search yield
Considerations for assessing the quality of evidence
Prompting questions for qualitative and quantitative articles
1.1
What was the research design and was it appropriate to answer the question?
1.2
What was the research question, and why was the study needed?
1.3
Is there a statement of ethical clearance?
1.4
Is there a statement about conflict of interest?
1.5
Was the sampling process appropriate for the study design?
1.6
Was the data analysis process appropriate for the study design?
Prompting questions for quantitative study
2.1
Were the results presented adequately?
2.2
Were the selection of statistics appropriate? Descriptive or inferential?Are the results statistically significant?
2.3
Were correlations and/or causality addressed?
2.4
Were there any considerations to bias?
2.5
Are there claims that the findings are generally useful to the population or is caution advised?
Prompting questions for qualitative study
3.1
Was a qualitative approach appropriate? Describe why or why not.
3.2
Consider how were the (a) setting and (b) participants selected. Describe how the study used purposeful/purposive methods for sampling.
3.3
What was the researcher’s perspective and how was this considered?
3.4
What were the methods and why/ why were they not appropriate for the study design?
3.5
Was the data analysis process appropriate for the study design?
3.6
How were the quality control measures used to enhance rigour?
3.7
How do the findings of the study contribute to practice?
Questions developed based on content describing how to review the methods of primary research papers1 and critical evaluation of published research2 1. Greenhalgh T, Bidewell J, Crisp E, Lambros A, Warland J. Understandin…
Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
Source: Get Help
