Consequentialism and deontology are two ethical moral philosophies discussed in our text. According to the two ethical philosophies, an individual’s duty and responsibility might be different with stockholders, vendors, government regulation entities, employees, upper management and the board of directors. Can you provide an accounting example to support how the two ethical moral philosophies might lead an individual to different actions with upper management, other employees, Board of Directors, and suppliers?
Chapters 3, 4, & 5 in Ethics in Accounting: A Decision-Making Approach
Hurley, P. (2017). Why consequentialism’s “compelling idea” is not. Social Theory & Practice, 43(1), 29.
Pintea, M. O., & Fulop, M. T. (2015). Corporate governance – Key factor to enhance performance. Managerial Challenges of The Contemporary Society, 8(2), 116-120.
Timmermann, J. (2015). V-what’s wrong with ‘deontology’? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Paperback), 115(1pt1), 75-92.
Prehn, K., Korczykowski, M., Rao, H., Fang, Z., Detre, J. A., & Robertson, D. C. (2015). Neural correlates of post-conventional moral reasoning: a Voxel-based morphometry study. Plos ONE, 10(6), 1-12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122914
Xu, Z., & Ma, H. (2016). How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior? The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 537-549.
Josephson, M. (2002). Making ethical decisions. Los Angeles, CA. Josephson Institute.
Klein, G. (2016). Ethics in accounting: A decision-making approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.