The aim of this essay is to explain in detail how an illicit drug market in Australia works. For this assessment you will need to describe the prevalence and characteristics of your chosen drug in Australia. This includes both demand, addressing such questions as who uses it, in what quantities and how this has changed over time; as well as supply, including the international and domestic supply chain, the nature and characteristics of local distribution (e.g. what type of market(s) facilitate sales of the drug; nature and extent of organised crime involvement at each stage of the distribution process). In addition to a detailed description of these aspects of the trade using reputable sources (e.g. government reports, peer-reviewed academic research), you are required to include relevant conceptual and theoretical material that helps explain some aspect of how the drug market operates. For example, this could include economic explanations for why drugs are priced the way they are, or other concepts that explain the nature of supply, such as the balloon effect, social supply or the iron law of prohibition. Suitable drugs to focus on for this assessment are listed below. Pick one of these to be the focus of your analysis: Methamphetamine Cocaine Heroin Ecstasy Fentanyl Illicit tobacco The required referencing system for this assessment is Harvard. A minimum of 15 references is required (higher graded essays will have more than this). The required word count for this assessment is 2000 words (with the usual 10% +/- leeway). Rubric CRI20002 Research essay rubric CRI20002 Research essay rubric Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUnderstanding of topic High Distinction Highly sophisticated, demonstrated understanding of the task. Distinction Superior demonstrated understanding of the task. Credit Good demonstrated understanding of the task. Pass Adequate understanding of the task. Fail Does not demonstrate understanding of the task/topic or fundamentally misinterprets task/topic. This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeGrasp of criminology theory High Distinction Superior demonstrated understanding of criminology theories and concepts and how they apply to chosen topic. Distinction Good demonstrated understanding of criminology theories and concepts and how they apply to chosen topic. Credit Fair demonstrated understanding of criminology theories and concepts and how they apply to chosen topic. Pass Basic or very little demonstrated understanding of criminology theories and concepts and how they apply to chosen topic. Fail Does not demonstrate understanding of criminology theories and concepts and how they apply to chosen topic. This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDevelopment of critical argument High Distinction Highly sophisticated, comprehensive and well developed argument. Demonstrated superior reasoning and critical thought. Distinction Superior well developed argument. Good critical reasoning. Credit Generates an adequate argument with some evidence of critical reasoning. Pass Minimal evidence of an argument. Limited critical discussion. Fail Does not construct a coherent critical argument. This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAppropriate use of research and selection of sources High Distinction Sophisticated use of research to support and extend ideas. Highly effective integration of ideas within published research. Distinction Ideas well integrated into and supported by published research. Credit Evidence of appropriate research, which has been used to support ideas. Pass Uses the appropriate number of sources but these fail to support ideas in an effective manner. Fail Lack of appropriate research. This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation (language and expression) High Distinction Highly accurate grammar. Highly sophisticated and effective expression appropriate to the task. Distinction Spelling and punctuation of a high standard. Superior expression. Credit Good expression. Improvement needed in relation to expression of ideas and articulation of argument. Pass Adequate use of language. Numerous mistakes in expression or grammar. Fail Sub-standard use of language. Substantial mistakes in grammar and/or awkward expression. This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing and bibliography High Distinction Consistent, highly accurate use and detail of a variety of appropriate scholarly sources. Distinction Strong use and detail of appropriate scholarly sources. Credit Generally accurate use of minimum number of sources. Pass Inaccurate, inconsistent or inappropriate use of sources. Fail Referencing and bibliography not of tertiary standard.
The post an illicit drug market in Australia works appeared first on My Assignment Online.