GAC5010 Performance Management

FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS PROGRAMME
ACADEMIC YEAR 2019-2020, 2nd Semester
August – 2020
WRIT3

Programme Title: A&F
Module Title: Performance Management
Module Code: GAC5010
Assessment Method: Coursework
Level: 5 Block: 2
Module Credits: 20 Weighting: 50%
Due Date: 23-Jun-2020, 12:00 AM Word Count: 3,000
Examiner(s): Dr. Rodrigo M. Velasco
Version: 1

Pg. 2 Version 1
Gulf College – Faculty of Business and Management Studies – In academic
Affiliation with CARDIFF SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

A.
Written work
A signed declaration that the work is your own (apart from otherwise referenced
acknowledgements) must be included after the reference page of your assignment
Each page must be numbered.
Where appropriate, a contents page, a list of tables/figures and a list of abbreviations should
precede your work.
All referencing must adhere to School/Institutional requirements.
A word count must be stated at the end of your work.
Appendices should be kept to the minimum and be of direct relevance to the content of your
work.
All tables and figures must be correctly numbered and labelled.



B.
Other types of coursework/assignments
Where coursework involves oral presentations, discussions, poster presentations, etc.,
specific instructions will be provided by your module leader/team.

———————————————————————————————————————————————
Rewrite below part just after the References of your assignment.
WORK DECLARATION
I, , hereby declare that the uploaded Coursework through Turnitin is my own work. I affirm that this
has been researched and completed in accordance with the college rules and regulations on
plagiarism.
I acknowledge the advice given by the module tutors on proper referencing to avoid plagiarism and
the rules on the academic unfair practice.
I acknowledge that I read and understand the plagiarism guide written at the end of this assessment.
Any academic misconduct will be handled according to the rules and regulations of the university.
Pg. 3 Version 1
General instructions
Coursework must be submitted online through Turnitin before due date. An acknowledgement will
be given to you by your teacher upon presentation of the finance clearance. This is your receipt,
keep it.
The only circumstance in which assignments can be uploaded late via Turnitin is if a Mitigating
Circumstances (MC) form is submitted at the same time. In these circumstances work may be
submitted within five (5) working days. Make sure to secure MC form and submit the same to the
concerned staff.
Write the number of words used, excluding references, at the end of your assignment. Provide the
list of sources you used at the last page of your assignment with proper label ‘References’. You may
include diagrams, figures etc. without word penalty. The number of words will be + or – 10% of the
total words allowed.
A work declaration must be included just after the reference page of your assignment. This ensures
that you prepare your work in good faith. Any form of collusion and/or academic unfair practice will
be dealt with according to the pertinent rules and regulations of the partner university. Please read
carefully the plagiarism guide.
Assessment Details
This Coursework comprises 50% of the total assessments marks. It will develop the following skills:
1. Research skills. Students are able to search for relevant literature and studies to support the
assignment theories and concepts.
2. Critical thinking. Students are able to evaluate the scenario given in the assignment and apply
solutions to the queries posed.
In addition, the assessment will test the following learning outcomes:
Identify relevant costs & appropriate techniques for decision making & use them to
facilitate the solution of a range of realistic management problems
Pg. 4 Version 1
Assessment Task
Ahmed Ali, the operations manager of Muscat Traders, is not fully convinced that he will be removed from his
post any time soon. After he received a letter from the CEO asking for clarifications on the various major
decisions he made, he felt that everyone is just perplexed by the implementations of the various performance
management tools. He was given by the CEO three days for complete explanation. He hired you as a consultant
on this matter. The following details were made clear by Ahmed Ali:
1. Mansoor, the production head, complained about the immediate implementation of Business
Process Re-engineering (BPR). He explained that the company is not yet ready for BPR. Instead, he
suggested that lean management be applied in all the production processes and procedures.
2. Fathma, the marketing manager, asked for the equal production of the various sizes of bed
sheets that the home decoration department manufactures. According to Ahmed Ali, there is limited
supply of raw materials used in the production. The decision comes after the preparation of the production
budget. He presented to you the following production data.
The home decoration department of the company produces three sizes of bed sheets. The sheet is made
from linen fabric that costs OMR 0.550 per metre. The workers are paid for OMR 0.200 per hour. The
company incurred fixed costs of OMR1,200 in 2019. The production data for 2019 follows:

Size Twin Queen King
Direct material (metre per unit) 1.3 2 2.5
Direct labour (hours per unit) 2 2.5 3
Direct expenses (per unit) OMR 2 OMR 2.5 OMR 4
Selling price per unit OMR 5 OMR 5 OMR 5

The supply of linen fabric is limited to 1,000 metres. The budget production (based upon maximum
demand) follows: Twin (200 bed sheets); Queen (220 bed sheets) and King (180 bed sheets).
3. Mahmood, the finance manager, argued that it is wrong decision to reduce the selling price of the
personalised mugs the houseware department manufactures. He said that reducing the price does not
give them advantage over the competitors. However, Ahmed Ali explained that the selling price
reduction gives lower contribution margin but increases the inventory turnover. Relevant to this, he
gave the following production data.
The houseware department manufactures personalised mugs used as token on various corporate events.
There were 2,000 mugs sold for OMR 3.950 each in 2019.
Pg. 5 Version 1

Cost Unit price in
OMR
Direct materials OMR 1.100
Direct labour OMR 0.900
Variable overhead OMR 0.100
Variable selling costs OMR 0.150
Fixed manufacturing OMR 2,200
Fixed non-manufacturing costs OMR 2,200
Fixed selling expenses OMR 500

Prepare a report for Ahmed Ali addressing the following:
1. Concerns on production process and procedures: (600 words)
a. Discuss the specific aims and applications of Business Process Re-engineering.
b. Discuss the specific aims and applications of Lean Management.
c. In terms of small-scale productions, discuss the appropriate performance management measures.
2. Concerns on limited resources: (1000 words)
a. Critically analyse the factors affecting limited resources in production management.
b. Based from the given data, prepare a production budget that will yield maximum profit from the
material available.
c. Based from your production budget, explain the reasons for unequal production of bed sheets.
d. Discuss measures to maximize profit with limited resources.
3. Concerns on production costing: (1000 words)
a. Discuss the application of variable costing and absorption costing in manufacturing industries.
b. Based from the given data, prepare the income statement using the variable and absorption
costing.
c. If Ahmed Ali decides to reduce the selling price of the product to OMR 3, prepare the income
statement using both the costing methods.
d. Discuss whether the decision to reduce the selling price is favourable or unfavourable.
4. Recommendation (400 words)
a. Prepare a summary report identifying the major decisions made by Ahmed Ali. State your stand,
whether the decision is justified or not.
b. Discuss the implications of the CEO’s actions on the performance of Ahmed Ali as production
manager.
References


Use at least 5 sources preferably refereed accounting journals and books or e-books.
Use the proper Harvard referencing style adopted by Gulf College.

Pg. 6 Version 1
GAC5010 – Performance Management
AY: 2019-2020 / 2nd Semester
Marking Scheme

No. Description Marks
Allocated
1  Discussion on Business Process Re-engineering – 5 marks
 Discussion on Lean Management – 5 marks
 Discussion on the appropriate performance management
measures of small scale production – 10 marks
20
2  Analysis of limited resources in production – 10 marks
 Preparation of production budget – 10 marks
 Explanation of the unequal production – 5 marks
 Discussion on maximisation of profit – 10 marks
35
3  Discussion of variable and absorption costing – 5 marks
 Preparation of income statement – 10 marks
 Preparation of income statement using reduced price – 10
marks
 Discussion of the decision – 10 marks
35
4  Preparation of summary report – 5 marks
 Discussion on the implications of the CEO’s actions – 5 marks
10

Plagiarism
1. Plagiarism, which can be defined as using without acknowledgement another person’s words or ideas
and submitting them for assessment as though it were one’s own work, for instance by copying,
translating from one language to another or unacknowledged paraphrasing. Further examples of
plagiarism are given below:
Use of any quotation(s) from the published or unpublished work of other persons, whether published
in textbooks, articles, the Web, or in any other format, which quotations have not been clearly
identified as such by being placed in quotation marks and acknowledged.
Use of another person’s words or ideas that have been slightly changed or paraphrased to make it
look different from the original.
Summarising another person’s ideas, judgments, diagrams, figures, or computer programmes without
reference to that person in the text and the source in a bibliography or reference list.
Use of services of essay banks and/or any other agencies.
Use of unacknowledged material downloaded from the Internet.
Pg. 7 Version 1
Re-use of one’s own material except as authorised by the department.
2. Collusion, which can be defined as when work that has been undertaken by or with others is submitted
and passed off as solely as the work of one person. This also applies where the work of one candidate
is submitted in the name of another. Where this is done with the knowledge of the originator both
parties can be considered to be at fault.
3. Fabrication of data, making false claims to have carried out experiments, observations, interviews or
other forms of data collection and analysis, or acting dishonestly in any other way.
Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS)
As part of its commitment to quality and the maintenance of academic standards, the University reserves the
right to use Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS), including Turnitin. Such software makes no judgment as to
whether a piece of work has been plagiarised; it simply highlights sections of text that have been found in
other sources.
The use of plagiarism detection software fulfills two functions. The first is to enhance student learning (i.e. as
a developmental tool); the second is to guard against and identify unfair practice in assessment.
Further information and guidance can be found in the University’s policy on the Use of Plagiarism Detection
Software.
Pg. 8 Version 1
GAC5010 – Performance Management
AY: 2019-2020 / 2nd Semester
Marking Criteria
Your assessment marks will be based on the following rubrics:

0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 100
Very Poor Very Poor Poor Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding Exceptional
Discussion on
Business
Process Re
engineering – 5
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
answer the
basic
requirements
of the task but
lacks clarity;
highly
irrelevant
ideas and
concepts;
highly
irrelevant
materials
which reflects
very limited
subject
knowledge; no
assignment
objectives set
Poor
discussion of
the
assessment
task;
irrelevant
ideas and
concepts;
irrelevant
materials
which
reflects very
limited
subject
knowledge;
no clear
assignment
objectives
Basic
discussion of
the
assessment
task; limited
ideas and
concepts;
limited use of
relevant
materials
which
reflects
limited
subject
knowledge;
assignment
objectives
are unclear
Good
discussion of
points in the
assessment;
relevant
ideas;
relevant
materials
reflects
subject
knowledge;
assignment
objectives
are set
Very good
discussion of
the points in
the assessment
task; relevant
ideas and
concepts;
relevant
materials
reflects
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
assignment
objectives are
defined
Excellent
discussion of
the main points
in the
assessment
task; highly
relevant ideas
and concepts;
excellent
presentation of
relevant
materials which
reflects
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
clearly defined
assignment
objectives
Outstanding
discussion of
the main points
in the
assessment
task; highly
relevant ideas
and concepts;
outstanding
presentation of
relevant
materials which
reflects
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
clearly defined
assignment
objectives
Exceptional
discussion of
the main points
in the
assessment
task; highly
relevant ideas
and concepts;
exceptional
presentation of
relevant
materials which
reflects
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
clearly defined
assignment
objectives
Discussion on
Lean
Management –
5 marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
answer the
basic
requirements
of the task but
lacks clarity;
highly
irrelevant
ideas and
concepts;
highly
irrelevant
materials
Poor
discussion of
the
assessment
task;
irrelevant
ideas and
concepts;
irrelevant
materials
which
reflects very
limited
Basic
discussion of
the
assessment
task; limited
ideas and
concepts;
limited use of
relevant
materials
which
reflects
limited
Good
discussion of
points in the
assessment;
relevant
ideas;
relevant
materials
reflects
subject
knowledge;
assignment
Very good
discussion of
the points in
the assessment
task; relevant
ideas and
concepts;
relevant
materials
reflects
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
Excellent
discussion of
the main points
in the
assessment
task; highly
relevant ideas
and concepts;
excellent
presentation of
relevant
materials which
reflects
Outstanding
discussion of
the main points
in the
assessment
task; highly
relevant ideas
and concepts;
outstanding
presentation of
relevant
materials which
reflects
Exceptional
discussion of
the main points
in the
assessment
task; highly
relevant ideas
and concepts;
exceptional
presentation of
relevant
materials which
reflects

Pg. 9 Version 1

which reflects
very limited
subject
knowledge; no
assignment
objectives set
subject
knowledge;
no clear
assignment
objectives
subject
knowledge;
assignment
objectives
are unclear
objectives
are set
assignment
objectives are
defined
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
clearly defined
assignment
objectives
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
clearly defined
assignment
objectives
thoroughness
of subject
knowledge;
clearly defined
assignment
objectives
Discussion on
the appropriate
performance
management
measures of
small scale
production – 10
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
examine
thecase but
no originality;
very poor
organisation
of ideas; very
poor analysis
of arguments;
no details and
evidences; no
theories used
to address the
issue
Poor
examination
of the case
with no
originality;
ideas are not
organised;
poor analysis
of
arguments;
very limited
concepts
with no
relevant
evidences;
limited
theories to
address
issues
Basic
examination
of the case
with limited
originality;
ideas not
properly
organised;
basic analysis
with limited
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
with limited
details and
evidences;
limited use of
theories to
address
issues
Good
examination
of the case
with
originality;
organised
ideas;
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
supported by
details;
distinguish
theories to
address
issues
Very good
examination of
the case with
perception and
originality;
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant
details;
distinguish
theories with
evidences to
address issues.
Excellent
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
Outstanding
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
Exceptional
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues.
Analysis of
limited
resources in
production – 10
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
examine
thecase but
no originality;
very poor
organisation
of ideas; very
poor analysis
of arguments;
Poor
examination
of the case
with no
originality;
ideas are not
organised;
poor analysis
of
Basic
examination
of the case
with limited
originality;
ideas not
properly
organised;
basic analysis
Good
examination
of the case
with
originality;
organised
ideas;
organised
arguments;
Very good
examination of
the case with
perception and
originality;
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays
Excellent
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
Outstanding
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
Exceptional
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and

Pg. 10 Version 1

no details and
evidences; no
theories used
to address the
issue
arguments;
very limited
concepts
with no
relevant
evidences;
limited
theories to
address
issues
with limited
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
with limited
details and
evidences;
limited use of
theories to
address
issues
compare
contrast
concepts
supported by
details;
distinguish
theories to
address
issues
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant
details;
distinguish
theories with
evidences to
address issues.
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues.
Preparation of
production
budget – 10
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
Very poor
calculations.
Totally
irrelevant
answers.
Inappropriate
structure.
Poor
calculations
with no
formula.
There are
major errors
on the final
answer
without
proper
workings.
There are
major
presentation
and
organisation
errors.
Basic
calculations
supported by
few formula.
There are
major errors
on workings
and final
answers.
Presentation
and
organisation
errors are
visible.
Good
calculations
with formula
but with
errors on
workings and
final answers.
Good
presentation
but with
mistakes on
organisation
and
structure.
Very good
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer. Very
good
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Excellent
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Excellent
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Outstanding
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Outstanding
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Exceptional
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Exceptional
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Explanation of
the unequal
production – 5
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
summarise
the
assessment
task; very
poor synthesis
of the
Poor
synthesis of
the
assessment
task; weak
summary of
the points
Satisfactory
synthesis of
the
assessment
task;
satisfactory
summary of
Good
synthesis of
the
assessment
task; good
summary of
the points
Very good
synthesis of the
points of the
assessment
task; very good
summary of the
evidences;
Excellent
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task; excellent
summary of the
evidences
Outstanding
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task;
outstanding
summary of the
Exceptional
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task;
exceptional
summary of the

Pg. 11 Version 1

assessment
task; very
weak
summary of
the points
presented;
very weak
position on
the points
raised
presented;
weak
position on
the points
raised
the points
presented;
unclear
position on
the points
raised
presented;
clear position
on the points
raised
strong position
on the points
raised
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
evidences
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
evidences
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
Discussion on
maximisation of
profit – 10
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
examine
thecase but
no originality;
very poor
organisation
of ideas; very
poor analysis
of arguments;
no details and
evidences; no
theories used
to address the
issue
Poor
examination
of the case
with no
originality;
ideas are not
organised;
poor analysis
of
arguments;
very limited
concepts
with no
relevant
evidences;
limited
theories to
address
issues
Basic
examination
of the case
with limited
originality;
ideas not
properly
organised;
basic analysis
with limited
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
with limited
details and
evidences;
limited use of
theories to
address
issues
Good
examination
of the case
with
originality;
organised
ideas;
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
supported by
details;
distinguish
theories to
address
issues
Very good
examination of
the case with
perception and
originality;
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant
details;
distinguish
theories with
evidences to
address issues.
Excellent
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
Outstanding
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
Exceptional
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues.
Discussion of
variable and
absorption
costing – 5
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
examine
thecase but
no originality;
very poor
Poor
examination
of the case
with no
originality;
Basic
examination
of the case
with limited
originality;
Good
examination
of the case
with
originality;
Very good
examination of
the case with
perception and
originality;
Excellent
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
Outstanding
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
Exceptional
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and

Pg. 12 Version 1

organisation
of ideas; very
poor analysis
of arguments;
no details and
evidences; no
theories used
to address the
issue
ideas are not
organised;
poor analysis
of
arguments;
very limited
concepts
with no
relevant
evidences;
limited
theories to
address
issues
ideas not
properly
organised;
basic analysis
with limited
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
with limited
details and
evidences;
limited use of
theories to
address
issues
organised
ideas;
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
supported by
details;
distinguish
theories to
address
issues
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant
details;
distinguish
theories with
evidences to
address issues.
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and
well-organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues.
Preparation of
income
statement – 10
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
Very poor
calculations.
Totally
irrelevant
answers.
Inappropriate
structure.
Poor
calculations
with no
formula.
There are
major errors
on the final
answer
without
proper
workings.
There are
major
presentation
and
organisation
errors.
Basic
calculations
supported by
few formula.
There are
major errors
on workings
and final
answers.
Presentation
and
organisation
errors are
visible.
Good
calculations
with formula
but with
errors on
workings and
final answers.
Good
presentation
but with
mistakes on
organisation
and
structure.
Very good
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer. Very
good
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Excellent
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Excellent
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Outstanding
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Outstanding
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Exceptional
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Exceptional
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.

Pg. 13 Version 1

Preparation of
income
statement using
reduced price –
10 marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
Very poor
calculations.
Totally
irrelevant
answers.
Inappropriate
structure.
Poor
calculations
with no
formula.
There are
major errors
on the final
answer
without
proper
workings.
There are
major
presentation
and
organisation
errors.
Basic
calculations
supported by
few formula.
There are
major errors
on workings
and final
answers.
Presentation
and
organisation
errors are
visible.
Good
calculations
with formula
but with
errors on
workings and
final answers.
Good
presentation
but with
mistakes on
organisation
and
structure.
Very good
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer. Very
good
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Excellent
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Excellent
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Outstanding
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Outstanding
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Exceptional
calculations
supported by
necessary
formula,
workings and
accurate final
answer.
Exceptional
presentation
and
organisation of
calculations.
Discussion of
the decision –
10 marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
summarise
the
assessment
task; very
poor synthesis
of the
assessment
task; very
weak
summary of
the points
presented;
very weak
position on
the points
raised
Poor
synthesis of
the
assessment
task; weak
summary of
the points
presented;
weak
position on
the points
raised
Satisfactory
synthesis of
the
assessment
task;
satisfactory
summary of
the points
presented;
unclear
position on
the points
raised
Good
synthesis of
the
assessment
task; good
summary of
the points
presented;
clear position
on the points
raised
Very good
synthesis of the
points of the
assessment
task; very good
summary of the
evidences;
strong position
on the points
raised
Excellent
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task; excellent
summary of the
evidences
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
Outstanding
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task;
outstanding
summary of the
evidences
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
Exceptional
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task;
exceptional
summary of the
evidences
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
Preparation of
summary report
– 5 marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
summarise
the
assessment
task; very
poor synthesis
of the
assessment
Poor
synthesis of
the
assessment
task; weak
summary of
the points
presented;
Satisfactory
synthesis of
the
assessment
task;
satisfactory
summary of
the points
Good
synthesis of
the
assessment
task; good
summary of
the points
presented;
Very good
synthesis of the
points of the
assessment
task; very good
summary of the
evidences;
strong position
Excellent
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task; excellent
summary of the
evidences
presented;
Outstanding
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task;
outstanding
summary of the
evidences
Exceptional
synthesis of the
main points of
the assessment
task;
exceptional
summary of the
evidences

Pg. 14 Version 1

task; very
weak
summary of
the points
presented;
very weak
position on
the points
raised
weak
position on
the points
raised
presented;
unclear
position on
the points
raised
clear position
on the points
raised
on the points
raised
profound
position on the
main points
raised
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
presented;
profound
position on the
main points
raised
Discussion on
the
implications of
the CEO’s
actions – 5
marks
No answer
given or a
totally
irrelevant
answer.
An attempt to
examine
thecase but
no originality;
very poor
organisation
of ideas; very
poor analysis
of arguments;
no details and
evidences; no
theories used
to address
the issue
Poor
examination
of the case
with no
originality;
ideas are not
organised;
poor analysis
of
arguments;
very limited
concepts
with no
relevant
evidences;
limited
theories to
address
issues
Basic
examination
of the case
with limited
originality;
ideas not
properly
organised;
basic analysis
with limited
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
with limited
details and
evidences;
limited use of
theories to
address
issues
Good
examination
of the case
with
originality;
organised
ideas;
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast
concepts
supported by
details;
distinguish
theories to
address
issues
Very good
examination of
the case with
perception and
originality;
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details;
distinguish
theories with
evidences to
address issues.
Excellent
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and well
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
Outstanding
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and well
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues
Exceptional
examination of
the case with a
high degree of
perception and
originality;
highly
organised
thoughts and
ideas; analysis
displays a
strong and well
organised
arguments;
compare
contrast and
differentiation
of concepts
supported by
relevant details
and evidences;
distinguish
relevant
theories with
related
evidences to
address issues.

The post GAC5010 Performance Management appeared first on My Assignment Online.

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
šŸ‘‹ Hi, how can I help?
Scroll to Top