Assessment #2 Marking Rubric (Research Project)
| STUDENT NAME: | STUDENT NUMBER: | ||||||
| First name | |||||||
| Criteria | High Distinction 80% – 100% |
Distinction (70% – 79%) | Credit (60% – 69%) | Pass (50% – 59%) | Fail (0% – 49%) | Score | Weight (Marks) |
| 1. Argument and context: Generates focused, sustained, and discernible arguments that answer the question one and are contextualised in this research task. |
Generates sophisticated arguments within a coherent response to the task, that are focused, sustained, discernible and fully contextualised in academic and professional practice. |
Generates sound arguments within a coherent response to the task, that are focused, sustained, discernible and fully contextualised in academic and professional practice. |
Demonstrates a sustained, focused and coherent response to the task, with fair attempt to contextualise in academic and professional practice. |
Presents partially focused, and discernible arguments, and some contextualisation in academic and professional practice. |
Fails to provide focused, sustained, and discernible arguments that are sufficiently contextualised in academic and professional practice. |
5 | |
| 2. Data Analysis: Attempting questions assigned in the task and pertinent to the chosen topic. |
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and outstanding use of data analysis methods |
Demonstrates a very good understanding and excellent use of data analysis methods |
Demonstrates a good understanding and good use of data analysis methods |
Demonstrates a limited understanding and limited use of data analysis methods |
Fails to understand and use data analysis methods |
17 | |
| 3. Reflective synthesis: Extracts conclusions and meaningful recommendations |
Sophisticated discussion of implications of the issues and excellent recommendations |
Sustained discussion of implications of the issues and well thought recommendations |
A fair discussion of implications for of the issues and Good set of recommendations |
Limited discussion of implications of the issues and reasonable discussion on recommendations |
No discussion of implications of the issues and Poor/no discussion on recommendations |
3 | |
| Late penalty | Marks awarded | 25 |
| Task | Marks | Awarded |
| Q 1a | 3 | |
| Q 1b | 2 | |
| Q 2a | 1 | |
| Q 2b | 2 | |
| Q 2c | 3 | |
| Q 3a | 2 | |
| Q 4a | 2 | |
| Q 5a | 3 | |
| Q6a | 2 | |
| Q6b | 2 | |
| Findings | 3 | |
| Total | 25 |
The post Assessment #2 Marking Rubric appeared first on My Assignment Online.
Plagiarism Free Assignment Help
Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms
✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers
✓ Deadline from 3 hours
✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included
✓ Unlimited free revisions
✓ Free to submit — compare quotes