| Fail 0-1 | Pass 2.5 | Credit 3-3.5 | Distinction 4 | High Distinction 4.5-5 | |
| Ability to critically reflect on development of own values and the impact of own values on practice | Did no reflect on own values or their impact of own professional practice | Limited ability to critically reflect on the development of own values and impact on practice. Mostly descriptive narrative | Good critical reflection on the development of own values and their impact on professional practice | Very good reflection of the development of own values and their impact on professional practice, with examples provided | In depth, exemplary critical reflection of the development of own values and their impact on practice with examples provided. |
| Ability to reflect on how one’s personal values fit with the ethical guidelines of AASW code of ethics | Did not address this question in the essay | Limited capacity to connect own values with AASW code of ethics, mostly descriptive | Good reflection, some examples provided of how own values relate to the AASW code of ethics | Very good reflection on the question at hand, relevant examples provided to exemplify the analysis | Outstanding ability to reflect on the connection between personal values and the code of ethics as a guidance for practice |
| Ability to critically analyse the statement “Unconditional positive regard for the other is a core ethical position for professional social work practice” and some of the challenges that it poses for the practice | Did not address this statement | Mostly descriptive narrative about the statement | Good reflection of the statement and some analysis of the challenges that it poses to professional practice | Very good ability to analyse the statement, its impact on practice with addressing the challenging it poses to practice | Outstanding ability to critically reflect on the statement connecting it directly to professional practice and responding to the challenges it poses for practice. |
| Structure and use of written academic language, use of academic sources and proper APA reference style | Poor structure and no or limited (1-2) academic references | Satisfactory written expression. Improvements can be done in grammar, spelling, referencing style. Less than 6 academic references (4-5) | Good written expression with some errors or referencing style need of improvement. Minimum of 6 academic references were used | Very good written expression with minimal errors in student’s own voice. More than 6 academic references, properly used and cited following the APA guidelines. | Excellent written expression, more than 6 academic references used in APA style. |
The post Ability to critically reflect on development appeared first on My Assignment Online.
Plagiarism Free Assignment Help
Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms
✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers
✓ Deadline from 3 hours
✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included
✓ Unlimited free revisions
✓ Free to submit — compare quotes
