ABOR2000 ASSESSMENT 3- Case study
Weight: 40% Length: 1000 words
Due: Friday 8th May 2020 by 11.59pm
| Fail performance < 9.5 – FF |
Basic performance 10-12.5 – P |
Good performance 13-15.5 – C |
Very good performance 16-18.5 – D |
Excellent performance >18.5 – HD |
Mark % |
| 1. Demonstrated ability to identify appropriate health services and resources for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients in the hospital including the importance it makes to appropriate nursing care and discuss it in the context of the case study. |
|||||
| Did not demonstrate an ability to identify appropriate health services and resources in the hospital for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients or its importance. Unable to discuss the services and resources in the hospital in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a basic ability to identify appropriate health services and resources in the hospital for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients or its importance. Basic ability to discuss the services and resources in the hospital in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a good ability to identify appropriate health services and resources in the hospital for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients or its importance. Good ability to discuss the services and resources in the hospital in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a very good ability to identify appropriate health services and resources in the hospital for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients or its importance. Very good ability to discuss the services and resources in the hospital in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers an excellent ability to identify appropriate health services and resources in the hospital for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients or its importance. Excellent ability to discuss the services and resources in the hospital in the context of the patient in the case study. |
/20 |
| 2. Demonstrated ability to identify and discuss a culturally safe environment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients and discuss it in the context of the case study. |
|||||
| Did not demonstrate an ability to identify and discuss a culturally safe environment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Unable to discuss culturally safe environments in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a basic ability to identify and discuss a culturally safe environment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Basic ability to discuss culturally safe environments in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a good ability to identify and discuss a culturally safe environment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Good ability to discuss culturally safe environments in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a very good ability to identify and discuss a culturally safe environment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Very good ability to discuss culturally safe environments in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers an excellent ability to identify and discuss a culturally safe environment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Excellent ability to discuss culturally safe environments in the context of the patient in the case study. |
/20 |
| 3. Demonstrated ability to briefly describe the social determinants of health and inequalities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as well as discussing it in the context of the case study. |
|||||
| Did not demonstrate an ability to briefly describe the social determinants of health and inequalities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. |
Offers a basic ability to briefly describe the social determinants of health and inequalities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. |
Offers a good ability to briefly describe the social determinants of health and inequalities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. |
Offers a very good ability to briefly describe the social determinants of health and inequalities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. |
Offers a excellent ability to briefly describe the social determinants of health and inequalities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. |
ABOR2000 ASSESSMENT 3- Case study
Weight: 40% Length: 1000 words
Due: Friday 8th May 2020 by 11.59pm
| Unable to discuss social determinants of health and inequalities in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Basic ability to discuss social determinants of health and inequalities in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Good ability to discuss social determinants of health and inequalities in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Very good ability to discuss social determinants of health and inequalities in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Excellent ability to discuss social determinants of health and inequalities in the context of the patient in the case study. |
/20 |
| 4. Demonstrated ability to reflect on personal biases and/or personal lens relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as well as discussing it in the context of the case study. |
|||||
| Did not demonstrate an ability to reflect on personal biases and/or personal lens relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Unable to reflect on the personal biases and/or personal lens in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a basic ability to reflect on personal biases and/or personal lens relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Basic ability to reflect on the personal biases and/or personal lens in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a good ability to reflect on personal biases and/or personal lens relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Good ability to reflect on the personal biases and/or personal lens in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers a very good ability to reflect on personal biases and/or personal lens relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Very good ability to reflect on the personal biases and/or personal lens in the context of the patient in the case study. |
Offers an excellent ability to reflect on personal biases and/or personal lens relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Excellent ability to reflect on the personal biases and/or personal lens in the context of the patient in the case study. |
/20 |
| Demonstrated academic written expression (spelling, grammar, structure etc), with appropriate Aboriginal terminology and the ability to demonstrate sound reasoning and idea developments with chosen topic. |
|||||
| Inability to develop sound reasoning and/or idea development for chosen topic. Poor overall flow and difficult to follow. No logical expression, poor expression and grammar. Poor sentence and paragraph structure. Numerous spelling mistakes. Poor or lack of Aboriginal terminology |
Offers a basic ability to develop sound reasoning and/or idea development for chosen topic. Basic overall flow and structure. Basic written expression. Basic grammar. Basic sentence and paragraph structure. Many spelling mistakes. Basic Aboriginal terminology with numerous errors. |
Offers a good ability to develop sound reasoning and/or idea development for chosen topic. Good overall flow and structure. Good written expression. Good grammar. Good sentence and paragraph structure. Some spelling mistakes. Good Aboriginal terminology with some errors. |
Offers a very good ability to develop sound reasoning and/or idea development for chosen topic. Very good overall flow and structure. Very good written expression. Very good grammar. Very good sentence and paragraph structure. A couple spelling mistakes. Very good Aboriginal terminology with a couple of errors. |
Offers an excellent ability to develop sound reasoning and/or idea development for chosen topic. Excellent overall flow and structure. Excellent written expression. Excellent grammar. Excellent sentence and paragraph structure. No spelling mistakes. Excellent Aboriginal terminology with no errors. |
/10 |
ABOR2000 ASSESSMENT 3- Case study
Weight: 40% Length: 1000 words
Due: Friday 8th May 2020 by 11.59pm
| Demonstrated the ability to research and link appropriate current and relevant materials/resources, including correct and standard APA academic referencing skills. |
|||||
| Poor or no evidence of research and/or appropriate links to current and relevant materials, including evidence-based best practice nursing literature. Inadequate number of reference sources with no Aboriginal resources. Incorrect and/or poor referencing techniques, does not adequately match the APA referencing guide (Standard academic format, direct quotes, in-text referencing, reference list). |
Evidence of basic research and limited appropriate links to current and relevant materials, including evidence-based best practice nursing literature. Limited number of reference sources, with minimal Aboriginal authors Basic referencing techniques, minimal matches to the APA referencing guide. (Standard academic format, direct quotes, in-text referencing, reference list). |
Evidence of good research and appropriate links to current and relevant materials, including evidence-based best practice nursing literature. Offers several reference sources including some Aboriginal authors Good referencing technique sometimes matches the APA referencing guide. Standard academic format, direct quotes, in-text referencing, reference list). |
Evidence of very good research and appropriate links to current and relevant materials, including evidence-based best practice nursing literature. Offers a substantial number of reference sources including Aboriginal authors. Very good referencing technique that mostly matches the APA referencing guide. Standard academic format, direct quotes, in-text referencing, reference list). |
Evidence of excellent research and appropriate links to current and relevant materials, including evidence-based best practice nursing literature. Extensive, in-depth and wide-ranging number of reference sources including Aboriginal authors. Excellent referencing technique that matches the APA referencing guide. Standard academic format, direct quotes, in text referencing, reference list). |
/10 |
| Total mark /100% = /40% |
The post ABOR2000 ASSESSMENT 3- Case study appeared first on My Assignment Online.
Plagiarism Free Assignment Help
Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms
✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers
✓ Deadline from 3 hours
✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included
✓ Unlimited free revisions
✓ Free to submit — compare quotes
