Critical Thinking Assignment (50 Points)
Important! Read First
Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Option #1:Ā My Power to Influence Essay
- Read the article found hereĀ (Links to an external site.).
- Write a short essay. Please include the following:
- Discuss three bases of individual power from the article (reward, legitimate, etc.) which you find in your workplace or other areas of your life.
- Share at least one example of these bases of power are used to influence others. Which of the bases do you find audiences to be most receptive or responsive? Are there any bases of power that you feel could be used in a more positive manner?
The body of this paper should be 3-5 pages in length, not including the Title and References pages and should adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA.Ā (Links to an external site.)
Option #2:Ā My Power to Influence Presentation
- Read the article found hereĀ (Links to an external site.).
- Create an APA-formatted presentation by using PowerPoint, Prezi, Visme, or other presentation software. Please include the following:
- Discuss three sources of personal power from the article (expertise, attractiveness, etc.) which you find most effective in your workplace or other areas of your life.
- Share at least one example of how your use of each personal power āsourceā influences others. Do you find your audiences to be receptive to your approaches? Are there any sources that you feel could use some improvement?
Your presentation should adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA.Ā (Links to an external site.)
Here are several presentation software links:
- PreziĀ (Links to an external site.)
- JingĀ (Links to an external site.)
- VismeĀ (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
ORG300 Mod 3 CT
| ORG300 Mod 3 CT |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements |
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content |
| 15.0 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. |
13.0 to >10.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. |
10.0 to >7.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. |
7.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. |
|
15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis |
| 15.0 to >13.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the topic. |
13.0 to >10.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. |
10.0 to >7.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. |
7.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. |
|
15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. |
| 5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. |
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. |
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. |
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style |
| 5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. |
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. |
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. |
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. |
|
5.0 pts |
| Total Points: 50.0 |
Like this:
Like Loading...
