Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now

Toyota Company: Moral Issues

Introduction
• Toyota company is one of the largest and most valued company globally.
• Founded in the year by Kiiricho Toyoda and the first car was developed
in the year 1936.
• The company is ranked 12th largest company in the world in terms of
revenue.
• It currently employs more than 330,000 employees (Al-Futtaim).
• The company sells vehicles in more than 160 countries
• It also has vehicle making factories in every continent.
• In the UAE the company has a franchise known as Al-Futtaim motors
which supply a wide range of activities
• The paper will look at the professional ethic theories and some of the
moral problems in Toyota Company.
Normative Professional Ethics
• Ethical theories help organizations to critically think and develop a comprehensive and justifiable way to deal
with moral issues in the company.
• Every theory has its own criteria for determining whether an action is morally right or wrong (Iacovino, 2002).
Types of normative professional theories.

  1. Consequentialist theories.
  2. Non-consequentialist theories.
    Consequentialist theory
    • The theory evaluates acts on the goodness or badness of their consequences
    • It bases its judgement that an action is best or right if it makes the world a better place
    • Examples of consequentialism are utilitarianism and hedonism.
    Utilitarianism
    • An action is right if it promotes happiness for not only by the performer of the action but also to everyone
    affected (Pfordten, 2012).
    • An action can be right even if the motive is wrong
    Hedonism
    • An action is morally right if the consequences produce pleasure to people or reduce pleasure to people.
    • Normative hedonism believes that pleasure should motivate people in doing the right thing.
    • Motivational hedonism believes that pleasure and pain determine peoples actions.
    Normative Professional Ethics
    • Criticism of consequentialist theories
    • It is difficult or impossible to know whether a consequence of action will be good ahead of time.
    • No one can know the future.
    • Some actions might be objectionable even though their consequences might be good.
    Non-Consequentialist theory
    • Type of normative ethical theory that opposes the assumption that the wrongness or the rightness of
    action can be determined by whether the consequences are good or bad (Nye, Plunkett, & Ku, 2015).
    • Overall goodness or badness of a consequence is not the only way to determine whether an action is
    right or wrong.
    Types of non-consequentialist theory
    • Virtue ethics: requires a person to act as a virtuous person would act in any situation
    Deontological ethics
    • Human beings should be treated with dignity and must be respected because they have rights
    • It provides the best model for applied public relation ethics.
    Criticism of Non-consequentialists theories
    • Some of the results of deontology might not be acceptable by all people
    • Deontological ethics promotes people to disregard the consequences of their actions.
    Moral issues in Toyota Company
    • Companies globally have changed the way they operate.
    • Most companies are now using ethics to govern their operations.
    • Professional ethics can be used to identify and solve some of the moral issues that exist in
    companies.
    Moral issues in Toyota Company:
  3. Consumer privacy and product safety.
    • The company was accused of putting profits first in their decision making instead of the
    safety of the consumer.
    • The company have made vehicles that had accelerator problems (Knoespel, 2011).
    • The company has also been accused of making vehicles that are susceptible to hacking.
    • When a vehicle is hacked, private data of the driver is collected by the hacker.
    Solutions
    • The company must ensure they test their vehicles before selling them to the consumers.
    • The company should also recall faulty vehicles to makes sure customers use only safe
    vehicles.
    Moral issues in Toyota Company
  4. Conflict of interest in the company.
    • Toyota has been marred by conflicts between the founding Toyoda family and Toyota’s non founding family.
    • The two factions have taken their feud to another level where there is a personal attacks.
    • Toyoda family accuses the other faction of sacrificing quality for faster growth of the company
    • The Toyota’s Non- founding family on the hand has accused the other side of being at fault in the current
    company crisis
    • solution
    • The best way to solve the crisis is for the two factions to work together towards a common goal (Bauman,
    2011).
  5. Job Discrimination in the work arena
    • Discrimination at workplace has also been a major problem in Toyota Company
    • The company was accused of not taking action when one of its female employees was sexually harassed
    (Hale, 2003).
    • The company was also accused discriminating a woman who was disabled by not reinstating her
    Solutions
    • The company should come up with policies rules that prohibits discrimination
    • The company can also hold training sessions for employees on what constitutes discrimination and how the
    HR should handle such matters.
    Finding Analysis: Reasons for the solutions
    provided
    • A Company should come up with innovative ways to solve some of the
    challenges it’s facing.
    • A company can destroy its image by violating professional ethics.
    Toyota should conduct product testing because:
    • Product testing gives an insight on how vehicles will function on the roads
    • The company will be able to determine what the vehicles system can endure
    especially when it comes to hacking.
    • Testing will give assurance that the products are up to standard.
    Organizations should work in harmony to deal with conflicts because
    • The company will be able to identify the cause of the conflict and will also
    be able to shine some deeper issues.
    • Working together can lead to a healthy discussion as diversified perspectives
    of a situation are considered (Bauman, 2011).
    Finding Analysis: Reasons for the solutions
    provided
    • The company should also come up with policies and
    rules that prohibit discrimination.
    • Creating a discrimination-free environment can
    increase productivity
    • The company will also avoid losing funds that might
    result from lawsuits and compensations
    • The company will also be able to save its reputation of
    being a company that condones discrimination.
    • A good reputation increases customers which in turn
    increases revenue.
    Conclusion
    • Toyota Company has moral issues that can negatively affect the
    company’s
    • Moral issues include Job discrimination, Consumer privacy and
    product safety and conflicts in business.
    • The company should use some of the solutions provided to solve
    its moral issues.
    • In the future, the company should focus on quality products and
    not profits.
    • The company must in the future handle its conflicts in the house.
    • The company should be in the forefront in fighting against
    discrimination
    References
    • Al-Futtaim. (n.d.). Retrieved 04 30, 2020, from toyota.ae/about-toyota:
    https://www.toyota.ae/about-toyota/
    • Bauman, D. C. (2011). Evaluating Ethical Approaches to Crisis Leadership:
    Insights from Unintentional Harm Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 281-295.
    • Hale, K. (2003). Toyota v. Williams: Further Constricting the Circle of Difference.
    Journal of Lawin Society , 275.
    • Iacovino, L. (2002). Ethical Principles and Information Professionals: Theory,
    Practice and Education. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 57-74.
    • Knoespel, R. M. (2011). “How Did Toyota Stay on Top?” Revisiting Crisis
    Communication Discourse. Master’s Theses.
    • Nye, H., Plunkett, D., & Ku, J. (2015). Non-Consequentialism Demystified.
    philosophersimprint, 15(04).
    • Pfordten, D. v. (2012). Five Elements of Normative Ethics – A General Theory of
    Normative Individualism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 449-471.

The post Toyota Company: Moral Issues appeared first on My Assignment Online.

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

Native UK, USA & Australia writers Deadline from 3 hours 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included Unlimited free revisions Free to submit — compare quotes
Scroll to Top