Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now

THEHR703 International Human Resource Management

By /

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
1/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
STUDENT WRITTEN ASSESSMENT

Business Unit/Work Group THCA
Qualification Code CRS1400588
Qualification Title Bachelor of Tourism, Hospitality and Events Management
Subject Code/s National Code: THEHR703
TAFE SA Code: SABMA
Subject Title/s International Human Resource Management
Assessment Title Assessment 2: Case Study
Student Declaration I hereby declare that the material herein submitted for assessment is my
own work except where specifically acknowledged and referenced.
Student Name
Student SIS ID
Student Signature
Date
Assessor Name
STUDENT GUIDE FOR WRITTEN ASSESSMENT
Overview of Assessment Students will write a response to the following questions relating to the
set case study listed below. The assessment will outline the International
Human Resource Management context and Talent Management.
Case study: Fred Bailey: An innocent Abroad – A case study in
Cross-Cultural Management. Source: Black, J.S. in Mendenhall,M
and Oddou, G Readings and Cases in International Human
Resource Management, 2nd edn, Ohio: South-Western College
Publishing
Case Study Questions:
Students will include discussion on:
Principles and practices for the effective management of human
resources locally and internationally
Social, economic, legislative and cultural factors impacting on
human resource management
Question 1
Given the issues he is facing, how should the recruitment process
have been handled in this case? Please outline the recruitment
process you would have used?
Question 2
Given that dual career couples are a barrier to staff mobility what
steps could the company have made to help Fred’s partner Jennifer
overcome the issues she faced.
Question 3
Outline the components that should have been covered in the pre
departure training program. Please take the assignment country
into consideration in your answer.

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
2/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

STUDENT GUIDE FOR WRITTEN ASSESSMENT
Question 4
What are some of the important work-related cultural differences
that might be causing the issues he is facing? Please provide an
analysis of this using more than one cross cultural management
theory covered in your text-book.
The case study will assess the following Learning Outcomes:
SLO 2: Investigate principles and practices for the effective management
of human resources locally and internationally e.g. cross-cultural
management.
SLO 3: Consider social, economic, legislative and cultural factors
impacting on human resource management.
To complete this assessment, students should have completed IHRM
Sessions 2-5 relating to Chapters 2-7 of the prescribed text.
Word count: 1750 word (Max of 1925words)
Assessment Weighting: 40%
Task/s to be assessed This is a written assessment as a response to the questions listed above.
Submissions must be structured and formatted to meet HE standards.
Due Date Week 6
Location Assessment is to be completed by students outside the classroom during
personal study time.
Assessment Submission Assessments must be uploaded to Learn course for the subject in the
appropriate section.
Each assessment should include an assessment cover sheet. Template
of assessment cover sheet is available on the Bachelor of Tourism,
Hospitality and Events Management TAFE SA Learn Home Page.
The first page of each assessment submission should include the
following information:
• Student Name:
• Student ID:
• Subject Name
• Assessment Name:
• Word Count (if applicable)
Documents must be uploaded in PDF format (PDF unless otherwise
advised) and file name of the document must include the following:
• Student name
• Student ID
• Subject abbreviation
• Assessment name
For assessment to be graded a final assessment must be submitted.
Draft submissions will not be graded.
Decision making rules Grade for this assessment will be determined according to the marking
rubric located at the end of this document.

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
3/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

STUDENT GUIDE FOR WRITTEN ASSESSMENT
Assessment conditions The assessment must be completed individually.
Correct use of Harvard Referencing must be applied as Turnitin similarity
reports will be reviewed on submission.
This assessment is to be completed according to TAFE SA assessment
policy and procedures. Refer to the Higher Education Student Handbook.
Resources required The online learning resource for this subject is the TAFE SA Learn
Course https://learn.tafesa.edu.au/course/view.php?id=9479
Sessions 2-5 relate to this assessment.
Case Study
Case study: Fred Bailey: An innocent Abroad – A case study in
Cross-Cultural Management. Source: Black, J.S. in Mendenhall,M
and Oddou, G Readings and Cases in International Human
Resource Management, 2nd edn, Ohio: South-Western College
Publishing
For additional resources to assist in assessment development please refer
to the Higher Education Student Handbook or TAFE SA libraries.
Students may benefit from accessing the TAFE SA Library Network
Catalogue to search the catalogue and access electronic information in
addition to other services.
TAFE SA Library Network Catalogue
Results/Reassessment Students will be notified of assessment grades within 10 working days via
the Learn course page for the subject.
Feedback will be available on Learn and accessed by clicking on the
original upload link.
Students may be granted a re-submission for a subject at the discretion
of the lecturer, who will consider special circumstances. Information
relating to resubmission will be provided to higher education students on
commencement of each subject.
The time frame for resubmission is within 72 hours after notification of
resubmission requirements.
The only grade available on a resubmission is a Pass or Fail.

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
4/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
Assessment 2

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Introduction
(10% of overall mark)
To provide background
information, scope and
define terms.		 Background information is
insufficient to adequately
establish the case study context /
irrelevant / inaccurate / unclear.
Key issues are not defined or are
defined incorrectly.
There is no discernible outline of
the main issues to be included
and analysed in the body or it is
unclear.
<5		 Adequate introduction
establishes the key issues
but lacks detail and/or
information is irrelevant.
Only few key issues are
defined or defined clearly.
Definitions may lack
detail/accuracy.
Overall organisation of ideas
to be analysed is fair;
however, many important
issues are not included or
clearly expressed.
(5-6)		 Adequate introduction
establishes the key issues but
lacks detail and /or some
information is irrelevant.
Many key issues are defined or
defined clearly. Definitions may
lack detail/accuracy.
Overall organisation of ideas to
be analysed is adequate;
however, some important ideas
are not included or clearly
expressed.
(7)		 Well-developed introduction.
Relevant background
information that clearly
establishes the case study
context.
Accurate definition of key
issues.
Overall organisation of all
main ideas to be analysed are
outlined.
(8-9)		 Well-developed and highly engaging
introduction. Highly relevant
background information that clearly
establishes the case study context.
Accurate and detailed definition of
key issues.
Overall organisation of all main
ideas to be analysed i are precisely
outlined.
(10)		 /10
Case study response
(Body)
(55% of overall mark)
Arguments and facts
(evidence) to build and
support introduced key
issues.
Comprises several
paragraphs, each focusing
on one discussion topic.
Case Study Questions:
Students will include
discussion on:
Principles and practices for
the effective management
of human resources locally
and internationally
Social, economic,
legislative and cultural
factors impacting on human
resource management
Question 1		 Little or no understanding of the
key issues outlined in the case
study.
Not able to identify or articulate
the issues.
Unable to link relevant theories
and/or concepts to appropriate
issues within the case study and
relevant industry practices.
Does not respond to all points
and assessment criteria.
Did not provide a range of
references to support arguments
and illustrate points.
<27		 Basic understanding of the
key issues highlighted in the
case study.
Able to identify the issues
accurately and explain the
issues at a basic level.
Responds to all case study
issues and assessment
criteria, some aspects in
more detail than others.
Able to identify general links
to relevant industry
practices.
Provided limited references
to support arguments and
illustrate points.
(28-35)		 Good understanding of the
issues outlined in the case
study.
Able to identify relevant issues
and provide a sound explanation
to their relevance of the
appropriate industries.
Able to correctly identify and link
relevant theories and/or
concepts to appropriate issues
in the case study.
Addressed all issues within case
study.
Used a range references and
analytical methods to address
issues.
(36-40)		 Clear understanding and
articulation of all the key
issues that relate to the
appropriate industries.
Able to form a clear argument,
explaining the relevance to the
case study topics.
Able to correctly identify and
link multiple theories and/or
concepts to all appropriate
issues in the case study and
consider relevant implications.
Used a range references and
analytical methods to address
issues to a high standard.
(41-46)		 Thorough understanding of the key
issues within the case study that
relate to the appropriate industries.
Able to build on the issues
highlighted, explaining their
relevance to the case study topics.
Well defined analysis linking multiple
theories and/or concepts to
appropriate issues in the case study
and thorough consideration of
relevant implications.
Responds to all case study issues
using precise and correct discipline
and professional terminology.
Used a range references and
analytical methods to address issues
to an outstanding standard.
>47		 /55

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
5/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Given the issues he is
facing, how should the
recruitment
process have been handled
in this case? Please outline
the recruitment process you
would have used?
Question 2
Given that dual career
couples are a barrier to staff
mobility what steps could
the company have made to
help Fred’s partner
Jennifer overcome the
issues she faced.
Question 3
Outline the components
that
should have been covered
in the pre-departure training
program. Please take the
assignment country into
consideration in your
answer.
Question 4
What are some of the
important work-related
cultural differences that
might be causing the issues
he is facing? Please
provide an analysis of this
using more than one cross
cultural management theory
covered in your text-book.
Conclusion and
recommendations
(10% of overall mark)		 Makes no recommendations for
improvements
Recommendations do not relate
to issues identified in the case
study.		 Makes limited
recommendations (1 or 2)
for improvements, with basic
reasoning.		 Makes clear recommendations
(1 or 2) for improvements, with
sufficient reasoning that reflects
application of case study
concepts and/or theories.		 Makes well developed
recommendations (2 or 3) for
improvements, with reasoning
that reflects understanding
and direct referencing of		 Makes excellent recommendations
(3 or more) for improvements, with
detailed reasoning that reflects
understanding and direct referencing		 /10

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
6/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Finalises the analysis and
provides recommendations.		 No summary of the main issues
presented, or it is poorly-defined.
No or poorly defined reference to
the connections between the
main issues presented.
Insufficient or no logical
conclusions or
recommendations.
No or an inadequate link/s to the
case study’s focus.
<5		 Overall recommendations
relate to issues identified in
the case study.
Adequate summary of some
of the main issues
presented.
Adequate but limited
reference to the connections
between issues and
recommendations.
Limited conclusions that
demonstrate some links with
the case study’s focus.
(5-6)		 Reasonably structured, clear
summary of most of the main
case study issues presented.
Good attempt to have some
reference to the connections
between these issues and
recommendations.
Logical but limited conclusions
that demonstrate adequate but
limited links with the case
study’s focus.
(7)		 academic theories and/or
concepts.
Well structured, clear
summary of all main case
study issues presented and
the main connections between
them.
Logical conclusions that
demonstrate clear links with
the case study’s focus.
(8-9)		 of academic theories and/or
concepts.
Succinct / well-structured summary
of all the case study issues
presented and the connections
between them.
Well considered, logical conclusions
that demonstrate clear and
compelling links with the case
study’s focus.
(10)
Structure, grammar and
spelling (10% of overall
mark)
Insert details relevant to
type of assessment.
e.g.
Structure Includes:
• Introduction (10% of
work count)
• Body (80% of work
count)
• Conclusion (10% of
work count)		 Does not meet word limit
Written work is not presented in
required structure.
Limited formatting or professional
appearance.
Poorly written using formal and
informal language
Constructed with minor to
significant errors in grammar,
spelling and punctuation.
<5		 Meets word limit
requirements
Written work is presented in
required structure.
Adequate level of formatting
and professional
appearance.
Written using limited formal
language and professional
terminology.
Constructed with numerous
errors in spelling punctuation
and grammar that inhibits
readability.
(5-6)		 Meets word limit requirements
Written work is logically
structured to create a cohesive
piece of work.
Good level of formatting and
professional appearance.
The writing is of good standard
with use of academic language
and professional terminology.
Minor spelling, grammatical,
punctuation and typing errors.
(7)		 Meets word limit requirements
The content has been logically
structured to create a cohesive
analytical piece of work.
Very good level of formatting
and professional appearance.
The writing is of a very good
standard with use of
consistent academic language
and professional terminology.
Does not have any, or very
few, spelling and/or
grammatical or typing errors.
(8-9)		 Meets word limit requirements
High quality essay that is logically
and succinctly structured. A
coherent analytical piece of work
that seeks to lead reader through
flow of ideas, with clearly defined
introduction and well-rounded
conclusion.
Assigned format followed explicitly
with exceptional professional
appearance.
The writing is of an excellent
standard using formal academic
language. Precise and correct
discipline and professional
terminology is used to clearly
communicate meaning.
Does not have any spelling and/or
grammatical or typing errors
(10)		 /10
Research and referencing
(15% of overall mark)
References are included
and correctly cited using
Harvard Referencing		 Does not support development of
arguments with relevant
academic evidence related to the
topic.
Relies too heavily one or two
references in body of work.		 Uses minimal number of
academic sources to support
argument.
Literature from a limited
range of sources has been
referred to throughout the		 Uses multiple number of
academic sources to support
analysis.
Literature from academic
sources has been summarised
and incorporated, supporting key
points.		 Uses multiple number of
academic sources to support
analysis.
A variety of relevant literature
from academic sources has
been cited throughout the		 Uses multiple number of academic
sources including journal articles or
research papers to support analysis.
An extensive range of relevant
literature from academic sources
has been evaluated and cited		 /15

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
7/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Not used as part of the
word count.		 Literature from sources that are
not credible or relevant and/or
use of internet referenced
material only.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference list
is minimal or non-existent.
<7		 essay and/or use of mostly
internet sources.
Conventions in both in- text
referencing and the
reference list has been
attempted but with errors
and inconsistencies.
(7 – 9)		 Internet references are
supported by other reference
material.
Conventions in both in- text
referencing and the reference
list are in evidence but there are
inconsistencies.
(10)		 body of work in supporting
arguments.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference
list has been used almost
always accurately and
consistently.
(11 – 12)		 throughout body or work in
supporting arguments.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and reference list has
been used accurately and
consistently.
>13
Total /100
Comments

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
8/8
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2-Case Study ©TAFE SA
THEHR703 International Human Resource Management | CRS1400588 BTHEM March 2019 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
ASSESSMENT OUTCOME

High Distinction (85-100%)
Distinction (75-84%)
Credit (65-74%)
Pass (50-64%)
Fail (0-49%)
Reassessment Details
(if applicable)
Date of reassessment

Reassessment Outcome (if applicable)

Pass (50%)
Fail (0-49%)
Feedback to Student Refer to Learn for specific feedback on assessment.
Student Name
Student Signature I have been advised of the outcome of this assessment.
Assessor Name
Assessor Signature
Date:

The post THEHR703 International Human Resource Management appeared first on My Assignment Online.

Plagiarism Free Assignment Help

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms

✓ Native UK, USA & Australia writers ✓ Deadline from 3 hours ✓ 100% Plagiarism-Free — Turnitin included ✓ Unlimited free revisions ✓ Free to submit — compare quotes

Related Posts

Scroll to Top